NCT06682299

Brief Summary

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most efficacious treatments available for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Although a maintenance ECT protocol exists, multiple barriers limit its use for long-term use. These barriers include procedure tolerability, cognitive side effects, financial burden, and unreliable social support to accompany patients for these treatments. On the other hand, a different modality of noninvasive neuromodulation called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be performed in the outpatient setting and does not need anesthesia. The likelihood of cognitive adverse effects with TMS is much lower than with ECT. Our clinical question encompasses piloting a maintenance TMS regimen to maintain remission in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. This will be a patient-preference clinical trial, with patients offered the choice to initiate maintenance TMS versus maintenance ECT after their index ECT sessions for treatment-resistant depression. There will be no randomization or placebo involved in this study.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 7, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 12, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 17, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

November 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

depressiontmsecttreatment resistant depressiontrd

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)

    One of the most widely used clinician administered depression scales containing 17 items. Scores range from 0 to 54 with 0-7 being normal, 8-16 being mild depression, 17-23 moderate depression and 24 or greater being severe depression. Higher scores equate to more severe depressive symptoms.

    Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS)

    Baseline and prior to each procedure for duration of study, up to six months

  • Change in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (RBANS)

    Baseline on initial presentation, at 6 months, and at 12 months

Study Arms (2)

TMS

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. They will receive TMS in this arm of study for maintenance treatment of their depression and monitored with depressive scales.

Device: Transmagnetic Stimulation

ECT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients who have achieved remission of treatment resistant depression through an initial course of ECT (8 to 12 sessions) at the University of Kentucky will be identified by the ECT attending physician as a candidate for this study. If they elect to continue with maintenance ECT treatments which is the current standard of care, their depressive symptoms and cognitive functioning will be monitored accordingly.

Device: Electroconvulsive Therapy

Interventions

TMS will be given for the maintenance treatment of treatment resistant depression following successful course of ECT (8-12 treatments).

Also known as: TMS
TMS

Patients will remain in standard of care treatment and receive maintenance ECT treatments for treatment resistant depression

Also known as: ECT
ECT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients treated for TRD who have achieved remission through an index series of ECT
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Deemed appropriate for maintenance TMS by their psychiatrist
  • Right-handed

You may not qualify if:

  • History of seizures or a seizure disorder
  • Related neurological disorder, or any other medical condition that would preclude TMS treatment determined by the treatment team.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40509, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (4)

  • Rachid F. Safety and Efficacy of Theta-Burst Stimulation in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of the Literature. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Nov;205(11):823-839. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000742.

    PMID: 29077650BACKGROUND
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

    PMID: 19833552BACKGROUND
  • Wilson S, Croarkin PE, Aaronson ST, Carpenter LL, Cochran M, Stultz DJ, Kozel FA. Systematic review of preservation TMS that includes continuation, maintenance, relapse-prevention, and rescue TMS. J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.040. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

    PMID: 34592659BACKGROUND
  • Magnezi R, Aminov E, Shmuel D, Dreifuss M, Dannon P. Comparison between neurostimulation techniques repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation vs electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of resistant depression: patient preference and cost-effectiveness. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 4;10:1481-7. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S105654. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27536079BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDepressionEpilepsy, Rolandic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorEpilepsies, PartialEpilepsyBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesEpileptic Syndromes

Study Officials

  • Gopalkumar Rakesh, MD

    University of Kentucky

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Austin R Messner, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Open label patient preference trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Medical Resident

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2024

First Posted

November 12, 2024

Study Start

April 17, 2025

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations