Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance and Costs of FFRB Vs. Standard Care in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
ECONOMY
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve for Physiological Assessment in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (ECONOMY)
2 other identifiers
observational
340
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. A rapid simplified method had been developed to determine non-invasive FFR (FFRB) by applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on anatomic models derived from computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA).In this current study, the aims is to compare the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, safety outcomes, and quality of life of using FFRB on top of CTCA for CAD diagnosis and treatment planning, versus standard of care in Singapore; and measure health care resource utilization and assess cost-effectiveness of adopting FFRB on top of CTCA to support decision making in managing patients with suspected CAD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2021
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 8, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.7 years
August 18, 2022
November 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare the diagnostic performance of FFRB vs. standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.
The outcome is the rate of invasive coronary angiography.
1 year for each enrolled subject
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare the total costs based on FFRB compared with standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.
1 year for each enrolled subject
Study Arms (2)
Group A
Both groups of patients will receive CT scan for calcium score and Coronary angiogram, viz CTCA scan. Non-invasive FFRb will be calculated for all the patients with acceptable CTCA image quality. Based on the medical history and CTCA results, the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA and treated with medical therapy, PCI or CABG
Group B
Both groups of patients will receive CT scan for calcium score and Coronary angiogram, viz CTCA scan. Non-invasive FFRb will be calculated for all the patients with acceptable CTCA image quality. However the FFRb results will only be given to the doctors who are taking care of the patients in Group B. Based on the medical history and CTCA with FFRb results (Group B), the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA and treated with medical therapy, PCI or CABG
Interventions
CTCA is a non-invasive test for diagnosis of anatomic coronary stenosis. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of FFRB (derived from in house calculation) with CCTA data in patients with intermediate coronary artery disease (CAD), as compared to an invasive FFR reference standard (FFR\<=0.80)
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects with intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD and with symptomatic suspected CAD who are scheduled to undergo initial clinically-indicated non-invasive coronary evaluation and have not undergone non-invasive coronary evaluation, including exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, SPECT or MRI, or CTCA within the past 90 days OR ICA at any time.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 21 to 98
- Providing written informed consent
- Subjects with intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD and with symptomatic suspected CAD who are scheduled to undergo initial clinically-indicated non-invasive coronary evaluation and have not undergone non-invasive coronary evaluation, including exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, SPECT or MRI, or CTCA within the past 90 days OR ICA at any time.
You may not qualify if:
- Suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. Subjects experiencing unstable angina are not excluded where clinical documentation has ruled out myocardial infarctions.
- Prior, clinically documented myocardial infarction
- PCI prior to first test
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) prior to first test
- Contraindications for CTCA such as
- Presence of pacemaker or internal defibrillator leads
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast
- Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in women of childbearing potential
- Body mass index\> 35kg/m2
- Contraindication to acute beta blockade
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
National University Hospital
Singapore, 119074, Singapore
National Heart Centre Singapore
Singapore, 169609, Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, 308433, Singapore
Biospecimen
EDTA Platelet Poor Plasma , Sodium Citrate Platelet Poor Plasma and EDTA buffy coat
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Lohendran Baskaran
lohendran.baskaran@singhealth.com.sg
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2022
First Posted
November 8, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 31, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share