AI Driven National Platform for CT cOronary Angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns Registry
APOLLO
1 other identifier
observational
8,000
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The overall aim is to build an AI driven national Platform for CT cOronary angiography for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns (APOLLO) for automated anonymization, reporting, Agatston scoring and plaque quantification in CAD. It is a "one-stop" platform spanning diagnosis to clinical management and prognosis, and aid in predicting pharmacotherapy response.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
August 19, 2022
August 1, 2022
6.2 years
April 19, 2022
August 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
AI precision toolkits: AI stenosis reporting
Stenosis reporting: Severity of stenosis and accurate anatomical localization of stenosis. The significance of a stenosis is determined by visual estimation of the maximal grade of luminal narrowing caused by the plaque. As recommended in SCCT guideline (Leipsic et al., 2014) , coronary stenosis can be graded as minimal, mild, moderate, severe and total occluded separately. Following the guideline, a stenosis will be classified as obstructive and non-obstructive. The location of the stenosis uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014)
baseline
AI precision toolkits: Agatston scoring
Agatston scoring: Agatston scoring of calcified plaque. As recommended in SCCT clinical practical guidelines (Leipsic et al., 2014), Agatston scoring programs generally identify pixels that exceed 130 HU as a level corresponding to calcium on a non-contrast study (Agatston et al., 1990) . The reader needs to identify each lesion discrete calcific focus) in each vessel distribution. The summed score for each vessel is generated by the scoring program based on an area-density (Agatston score) (Agatston et al., 1990) measurement of each calcified focus. The total coronary Agatston score is the sum of all calcified lesions in all coronary beds.
baseline
AI precision toolkits: Plaque
Plaque analysis: Plaque volume, burden, type and anatomical locations. Coronary segmentation and plaque analysis is performed for segments with diameter ≥1.5 mm. Location of plaque uses the SCCT model (Leipsic et al., 2014). For each plaque, the reader marks its start-and end-points, quantifies plaque area,volume and plaque burden, and specifies its type (non-calcified, calcified, or mixed) (Achenbach et al., 2004) . Additionally, non-calcified plaque can be further divided into low attenuation plaque (LAP). A HU \<30 will signify LAP and \>30 will signify non-LAP.
baseline
AI precision toolkits: EAT analysis
EAT analysis: Total volume and anatomical locations. EAT and pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) are metabolically active fat surrounding the coronary artery and the heart, being associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (Villasante et al, 2019) . EAT can be quantified on non-contrast CT scans. The annotations on the CT scans are obtained by manually drawing the pericardium first to define the region. EAT is identified using the adipose tissue attenuation references between -190 and -30 HU (Oikonomou et al., 2018) . Due to the CT scan noise and changing of attenuation, the HU value of fat can vary, so the final EAT region is verified by an experienced radiologist or cardiologist.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
AI outcome analysis
one to five years from baseline
AI outcome analysis
one to five years from baseline
AI outcome analysis
one to five years from baseline
Study Arms (2)
Retrospective
4000 patients who were clinically evaluated by CTCA from 1 Jan 2007 to 31 Oct 2017.
Prospective
4000 patients who are clinically evaluated by CTCA.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who are clinically evaluated by CTCA
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥21 years old
- Signed informed consent
- Clinically indicated for evaluation by CTCA
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals unable to provide informed consent
- Known complex congenital heart disease
- Planned invasive angiography for reasons other than CAD
- Non-cardiac illness with life expectancy \< 2 years
- Pregnancy
- Concomitant participation in another clinical trial in which subject is subject to investigational drug or device
- Cardiac event and/or coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular repair/replacement prior to CTCA
- Glomerular Filtration Rate ≤ 30mL/min
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast agent
- Contraindications to beta blockers or nitroglycerin or adenosine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
National Heart Centre Singapore
Singapore, 169609, Singapore
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (3)
Leng S, Cheng N, Tan E, Baskaran L, Teo L, Yew MS, Ngiam KY, Huang W, Chai P, Ong CC, Sia CH, Singh M, Loong YT, Raffiee NAS, Wang X, Allen J, Tan SY, Chan M, Lee HK, Zhong L. Deep learning-based quantification of epicardial adipose tissue volume from non-contrast computed tomography images: a multi-centre study. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Oct 13;6(6):1223-1233. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf116. eCollection 2025 Nov.
PMID: 41267847DERIVEDBaskaran L, Leng S, Dutta U, Teo L, Yew MS, Sia CH, Chew NW, Huang W, Lee HK, Vaughan R, Ngiam KY, Lu Z, Wang X, Tan EWP, Cheng NZY, Tan SY, Chan MY, Zhong L; APOLLO investigators. Cohort profile: AI-driven national Platform for CCTA for clinicaL and industriaL applicatiOns (APOLLO). BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 2;14(12):e089047. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089047.
PMID: 39622571DERIVEDWang X, Leng S, Lu Z, Huang S, Lee BH, Baskaran L, Yew MS, Teo L, Chan MY, Ngiam KY, Lee HK, Zhong L, Huang W. Context-aware deep network for coronary artery stenosis classification in coronary CT angiography. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2023 Jul;2023:1-4. doi: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340650.
PMID: 38083399DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liang Zhong
National Heart Centre Singapore
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2022
First Posted
August 19, 2022
Study Start
October 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share