NCT06678425

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to study the efficacy of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on shoulder subluxation in subacute stroke patients. The main questions it aims to answer are Could rPMS reduce shoulder subluxation and improve upper-limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients? Researchers will compare real rPMS to sham rPMS to see if rPMS works to improve shoulder subluxation and upper-limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Participants will:

  • Get real rPMS or sham rPMS for 20 minutes, 5 days a week for 2 weeks
  • Get conventional rehabilitation program 5 days a week for 2 weeks
  • Follow-up at 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after first day of treatment

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

November 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Acromiohumeral interval

    the shortest distance between two parallel lines drawn from the inferior border of the acromion and the superior border of the humerus head on the anteroposterior shoulder x-ray

    pretreatment, 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after first day of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremities (FMA-UE)

    pretreatment, 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after first day of treatment

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    pretreatment, 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after first day of treatment

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS)

    pretreatment, 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks after first day of treatment

Study Arms (2)

real rPMS

EXPERIMENTAL

Active rPMS administered for 10 sessions over a 2-week period (5 sessions per week)

Device: Peripheral magnetic stimulator

sham rPMS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham rPMS administered for 10 sessions over a 2-week period (5 sessions per week).

Device: Peripheral magnetic stimulator

Interventions

Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) applied to the supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles. Parameters include a frequency of 20 Hz, with a total of 2,400 pulses per session.

Also known as: PMS
real rPMS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subacute phase (seven days to six months) and first time of stroke patients
  • Shoulder subluxation that measured half of a fingerbreadth or more
  • Meet the criteria for admission to a comprehensive rehabilitation program
  • Medically stable
  • Intact skin on the hemiparetic arm

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with contraindication for magnetic stimulation; cardiac pacemakers, magnetic materials near the intended stimulation site
  • Patients with pregnancy
  • Patients with severe aphasia or severe cognitive impairment
  • Patients with previous shoulder pathology or limit shoulder function before stroke
  • Patients with unstable vital signs

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Ratchathewi, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (21)

  • Hemrungrojn S, Tangwongchai S, Charoenboon T, Panasawat M, Supasitthumrong T, Chaipresertsud P, Maleevach P, Likitjaroen Y, Phanthumchinda K, Maes M. Use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Thai Version to Discriminate Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment from Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Controls: Machine Learning Results. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(2):183-194. doi: 10.1159/000517822. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

  • Manigandan JB, Ganesh GS, Pattnaik M, Mohanty P. Effect of electrical stimulation to long head of biceps in reducing gleno humeral subluxation after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(2):245-52. doi: 10.3233/NRE-131041.

  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.

  • Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232-40. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.

  • Jiang YF, Zhang D, Zhang J, Hai H, Zhao YY, Ma YW. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation applied in Early Subacute Stroke: Effects on Severe Upper-limb Impairment. Clin Rehabil. 2022 May;36(5):693-702. doi: 10.1177/02692155211072189. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

  • Hall J, Dudgeon B, Guthrie M. Validity of clinical measures of shoulder subluxation in adults with poststroke hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):526-33. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.526.

  • Yang C, Chen P, Du W, Chen Q, Yang H, Su M. Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography Assessment of Functional Magnetic Stimulation on the Effect of Glenohumeral Subluxation in Acute Poststroke Hemiplegic Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 3;2018:6085961. doi: 10.1155/2018/6085961. eCollection 2018.

  • Fujimura K, Kagaya H, Endou C, Ishihara A, Nishigaya K, Muroguchi K, Tanikawa H, Yamada M, Kanada Y, Saitoh E. Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Shoulder Subluxations Caused by Stroke: A Preliminary Study. Neuromodulation. 2020 Aug;23(6):847-851. doi: 10.1111/ner.13064. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

  • Beaulieu LD, Schneider C. Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on normal or impaired motor control. A review. Neurophysiol Clin. 2013 Oct;43(4):251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

  • Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR. Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke. 1999 May;30(5):963-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.5.963.

  • Stecker MM, Patterson T, Netherton BL. Mechanisms of electrode induced injury. Part 1: theory. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol. 2006 Dec;46(4):315-42.

  • Lee JH, Baker LL, Johnson RE, Tilson JK. Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for management of shoulder subluxation post-stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Nov;31(11):1431-1444. doi: 10.1177/0269215517700696. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

  • Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.

  • Arya KN, Pandian S, Puri V. Rehabilitation methods for reducing shoulder subluxation in post-stroke hemiparesis: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018 Jan;25(1):68-81. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1383712. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

  • Adey-Wakeling Z, Liu E, Crotty M, Leyden J, Kleinig T, Anderson CS, Newbury J. Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Reduces Quality of Life After Acute Stroke: A Prospective Population-Based Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;95(10):758-63. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000496.

  • Kumar P, Fernando C, Mendoza D, Shah R. Risk and associated factors for hemiplegic shoulder pain in people with stroke: a systematic literature review. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2021;27(3):191-204.

    RESULT
  • Paci M, Nannetti L, Taiti P, Baccini M, Rinaldi L. Shoulder subluxation after stroke: relationships with pain and motor recovery. Physiother Res Int. 2007 Jun;12(2):95-104. doi: 10.1002/pri.349.

  • Stolzenberg D, Siu G, Cruz E. Current and future interventions for glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia secondary to stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):444-56. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-444.

  • Suethanapornkul S, Kuptniratsaikul PS, Kuptniratsaikul V, Uthensut P, Dajpratha P, Wongwisethkarn J. Post stroke shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain: a cohort multicenter study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Dec;91(12):1885-92.

  • Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D. Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Clin Rehabil. 2002 May;16(3):276-98. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr491oa.

  • Paci M, Nannetti L, Rinaldi LA. Glenohumeral subluxation in hemiplegia: An overview. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005 Jul-Aug;42(4):557-68. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2004.08.0112.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial, Double-blind, Sham-controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2024

First Posted

November 7, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion

February 15, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations