NCT06678061

Brief Summary

To compare between the efficacy of radiofrequency splanchnic denervation and neurolytic retrocrural celiac plexus block in chronic upper abdominal cancer pain

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 4, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 7, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

November 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) pain scale

    Change in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) pain scale at the first 2 weeks compared to the pre-procedural pain

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • 1- Total opioid consumption

    6 months

  • Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy or Cancer Therapy (FACT)

    6 months

  • Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

radiofrequency splanchnic denervation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Radiofrequency ablation of splenic nerve. The nerves were then anesthetized with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine before RF performed. In RFA group, lesion will be performed at 80 degrees celsius for 3 lesions 2 minutes each on both sides.

Device: radiofrequency

Celiac plexuc block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Neurolytic ablation of the celiac plexus.Two milliliter of contrast material will be injected in each side for confirmation a test injection with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine to both sides, and wait for 5 minutes then inject 5 ml of 100% alcohol will in each side after 5 minutes to allow the local anesthetic to take action. 1 ml of 2%

Device: radiofrequency

Interventions

block of neurolytic retrocrural celiac plexus block

Also known as: plexus block
Celiac plexuc blockradiofrequency splanchnic denervation

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged from 20-70 years old, with upper GIT tumors, including cancer of the lower third of the esophagus, stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, cancer liver, and cancer of the biliary tract,
  • Abdominal cancer pain: includes patients with NRS pain score ≥ 5. \[16\]
  • Included participants should show adequate response to diagnostic block for the splanchnic nerves, i.e. reduction of NRS pain score \> 50% at least for 2 hours

You may not qualify if:

  • \- a- Patient's refusal. b- Patients medical condition as: coagulopathies, moderate or major cardiac/respiratory incapacitating diseases, liver or renal failure, infection either systemic or localized and anatomical anomalies or lesions at the spine.
  • c- Any psychiatric illness that would interfere with the perception and the assessment of pain, and any reason that would result in the protocol violation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Assiut University

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515, Egypt

Location

South Egypt Cancer Institute

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C. Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1596-602. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0333-y. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

    PMID: 17874169BACKGROUND
  • Lowe B, Decker O, Muller S, Brahler E, Schellberg D, Herzog W, Herzberg PY. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care. 2008 Mar;46(3):266-74. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318160d093.

    PMID: 18388841BACKGROUND
  • Cherny N, Ripamonti C, Pereira J, Davis C, Fallon M, McQuay H, Mercadante S, Pasternak G, Ventafridda V; Expert Working Group of the European Association of Palliative Care Network. Strategies to manage the adverse effects of oral morphine: an evidence-based report. J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 1;19(9):2542-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.9.2542.

    PMID: 11331334BACKGROUND
  • Miguel R. Interventional treatment of cancer pain: the fourth step in the World Health Organization analgesic ladder? Cancer Control. 2000 Mar-Apr;7(2):149-56. doi: 10.1177/107327480000700205.

    PMID: 10783819BACKGROUND
  • Peipert JD, Cella D. Bifactor analysis confirmation of the factorial structure of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1149-1152. doi: 10.1002/pon.5062. Epub 2019 Apr 17. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30883962BACKGROUND
  • Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15621359BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Dr. Samy Erfan, MD

    AssiutUniversity

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Nourhan Elgallay, Msc

    Assiut University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2024

First Posted

November 7, 2024

Study Start

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion

July 1, 2024

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

November 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations