Response Times in Danish Emergency Medical Services
AHRTEMIS
Ambulance and Helicopter Response Times in Danish Emergency Medical Services: Protocol for an Epidemiological Study. The AHRTEMIS Study
1 other identifier
observational
2,500,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aim of this retrospective observational study is to investigate the association of emergency medical services response time with patient survival and treatment outcomes. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the association between response time and patient survival? The investigators will collect data for all patients who were treated by ambulance and/or helicopter services in Denmark and follow the patient's path from illness or injury to discharge from hospital with a focus on the significance of ambulance and helicopter response time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
ExpectedDecember 30, 2025
December 1, 2025
11 months
October 22, 2024
December 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30-day survival
Patient is alive 30 days after hospital admission
Status at 30 days after hospital admission
Secondary Outcomes (5)
24 hour survival
Status at 24 hours after hospital admission
48 hour survival
Status at 48 hours after hospital admission
7-day survival
Status at seven days after hospital admission
90-day survival
Status at 90 days after hospital admission
Survival to hospital discharge
Status at hospital discharge, assessed up to 5 days
Other Outcomes (12)
Length of hospital stay
From hospital admission to hospital discharge, up to one year after enrollment
Days in ICU
From admission to intensive care unit until discharge from intensive care unit, up to one year after enrollment
Ventilator days
From admission to intensive care unit until discharge from intensive care unit, up to one year after enrollment
- +9 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients in need of treatment by emergency medical services
All patients in Denmark to whom an ambulance or helicopter has been disapatched
Interventions
Prehospital treatment by ambulance and/or helicopter services personnel of patients in acute conditions
Eligibility Criteria
Every patient in Denmark in need of ambulance and/or helicopter services treatment from 2016 to 2022 with one year follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- No civil personal registration number available
- Patient not identified
- Patient not entered in the prehospital electronic patient journal
- invalid data entered
- No linkage between substitue personal register number and actual personal register number for patients identified later;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Peter Martin Hansenlead
- University of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000, Denmark
Related Publications (39)
Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
PMID: 26238958BACKGROUNDChesnaye NC, Stel VS, Tripepi G, Dekker FW, Fu EL, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research. Clin Kidney J. 2021 Aug 26;15(1):14-20. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab158. eCollection 2022 Jan.
PMID: 35035932BACKGROUNDLevesque LE, Hanley JA, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes. BMJ. 2010 Mar 12;340:b5087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5087. No abstract available.
PMID: 20228141BACKGROUNDHu X, Zhao J, Lin Z, Wang Y, Peng H, Zhao H, Wan X, Yang C. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 12;119(28):e2106858119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106858119. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
PMID: 35787050BACKGROUNDCarter AR, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, Richmond RC, Davey Smith G, Heron J, Taylor AE, Davies NM, Howe LD. Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 May;36(5):465-478. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1. Epub 2021 May 7.
PMID: 33961203BACKGROUNDVanderWeele TJ, Hernan MA. Results on differential and dependent measurement error of the exposure and the outcome using signed directed acyclic graphs. Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun 15;175(12):1303-10. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr458. Epub 2012 May 8.
PMID: 22569106BACKGROUNDRijnhart JJM, Valente MJ, Smyth HL, MacKinnon DP. Statistical Mediation Analysis for Models with a Binary Mediator and a Binary Outcome: the Differences Between Causal and Traditional Mediation Analysis. Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):408-418. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01308-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
PMID: 34782926BACKGROUNDSuzuki E, Yamamoto E. Strength in causality: discerning causal mechanisms in the sufficient cause model. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):899-908. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00798-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
PMID: 34564795BACKGROUNDSchober P, Vetter TR. Linear Regression in Medical Research. Anesth Analg. 2021 Jan;132(1):108-109. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005206. No abstract available.
PMID: 33315608BACKGROUNDHess AS, Hess JR. Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Transfusion. 2020 Apr;60(4):670-672. doi: 10.1111/trf.15725. Epub 2020 Feb 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 32077507BACKGROUNDHsu CH, Yu M. Cox regression analysis with missing covariates via nonparametric multiple imputation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1676-1688. doi: 10.1177/0962280218772592. Epub 2018 May 2.
PMID: 29717943BACKGROUNDZhang Z, Reinikainen J, Adeleke KA, Pieterse ME, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM. Time-varying covariates and coefficients in Cox regression models. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):121. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.02.12.
PMID: 29955581BACKGROUNDBroderick JP, Adeoye O, Elm J. Evolution of the Modified Rankin Scale and Its Use in Future Stroke Trials. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):2007-2012. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017866. Epub 2017 Jun 16. No abstract available.
PMID: 28626052BACKGROUNDJahn M, Rekowski J, Gerken G, Kribben A, Canbay A, Katsounas A. The predictive performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in an intermediate care unit for internal medicine at a German university transplant center; A retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0222164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222164. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31553738BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDAyilara OF, Zhang L, Sajobi TT, Sawatzky R, Bohm E, Lix LM. Impact of missing data on bias and precision when estimating change in patient-reported outcomes from a clinical registry. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jun 20;17(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1181-2.
PMID: 31221151BACKGROUNDLi J, Guo S, Ma R, He J, Zhang X, Rui D, Ding Y, Li Y, Jian L, Cheng J, Guo H. Comparison of the effects of imputation methods for missing data in predictive modelling of cohort study datasets. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02173-x.
PMID: 38365610BACKGROUNDCuschieri S. The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.
PMID: 30930717BACKGROUNDSchmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;29(8):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
PMID: 24965263BACKGROUNDPedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494810387965.
PMID: 21775345BACKGROUNDAlstrup K, Petersen JAK, Barfod C, Knudsen L, Rognas L, Moller TP. The Danish helicopter emergency medical service database: high quality data with great potential. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 5;27(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0615-5.
PMID: 30953564BACKGROUNDKjaer J, Milling L, Wittrock D, Nielsen LB, Mikkelsen S. The data quality and applicability of a Danish prehospital electronic health record: A mixed-methods study. PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293577. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37883522BACKGROUNDAndersen MS, Johnsen SP, Sorensen JN, Jepsen SB, Hansen JB, Christensen EF. Implementing a nationwide criteria-based emergency medical dispatch system: a register-based follow-up study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Jul 9;21:53. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-53.
PMID: 23835246BACKGROUNDLindskou TA, Mikkelsen S, Christensen EF, Hansen PA, Jorgensen G, Hendriksen OM, Kirkegaard H, Berlac PA, Sovso MB. The Danish prehospital emergency healthcare system and research possibilities. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 4;27(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0676-5.
PMID: 31684982BACKGROUNDFrydenlund J, Mackenhauer J, Christensen EF, Christensen HC, Vaeggemose U, Steinmetz J, Johnsen SP. Socioeconomic Disparities in Prehospital Emergency Care in a Danish Tax-Financed Healthcare System: Nationwide Cohort Study. Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 27;14:555-565. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S358801. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35509522BACKGROUNDHansen PM, Rehn M, Lassen AM, Perner A, et al. Ambulance and Helicopter Response Times in Danish Emergency Medical Services. Protocol for an Epidemiological Assessment Analysis. The AHRTEMIS study. Open Science Framework. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/SZG4W. Accessed 21 August 2024. https://osf.io/
BACKGROUNDFrischknecht Christensen E, Berlac PA, Nielsen H, Christiansen CF. The Danish quality database for prehospital emergency medical services. Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:667-671. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S100919. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27843347BACKGROUNDHansen PM, Nielsen MS, Rehn M, Lassen AT, Mikkelsen S, Perner A, Brochner AC. Ambulance and helicopter response time. Association with patient outcome and illness severity: Protocol of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Feb;68(2):287-296. doi: 10.1111/aas.14339. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
PMID: 37870745BACKGROUNDEvans DM, Davey Smith G. Mendelian Randomization: New Applications in the Coming Age of Hypothesis-Free Causality. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:327-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050016. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
PMID: 25939054BACKGROUNDSekula P, Del Greco M F, Pattaro C, Kottgen A. Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Nov;27(11):3253-3265. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010098. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
PMID: 27486138BACKGROUNDKyriacou DN, Lewis RJ. Confounding by Indication in Clinical Research. JAMA. 2016 Nov 1;316(17):1818-1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16435. No abstract available.
PMID: 27802529BACKGROUNDMurray B, Kue R. The Use of Emergency Lights and Sirens by Ambulances and Their Effect on Patient Outcomes and Public Safety: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):209-216. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001503. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
PMID: 28134063BACKGROUNDBlackwell TH, Kline JA, Willis JJ, Hicks GM. Lack of association between prehospital response times and patient outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):444-50. doi: 10.1080/10903120902935363.
PMID: 19731155BACKGROUNDWeiss S, Fullerton L, Oglesbee S, Duerden B, Froman P. Does ambulance response time influence patient condition among patients with specific medical and trauma emergencies? South Med J. 2013 Mar;106(3):230-5. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182882c70.
PMID: 23462493BACKGROUNDBlanchard IE, Doig CJ, Hagel BE, Anton AR, Zygun DA, Kortbeek JB, Powell DG, Williamson TS, Fick GH, Innes GD. Emergency medical services response time and mortality in an urban setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):142-51. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.614046. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
PMID: 22026820BACKGROUNDPons PT, Haukoos JS, Bludworth W, Cribley T, Pons KA, Markovchick VJ. Paramedic response time: does it affect patient survival? Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;12(7):594-600. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.02.013.
PMID: 15995089BACKGROUNDBlackwell TH, Kaufman JS. Response time effectiveness: comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Apr;9(4):288-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01321.x.
PMID: 11927452BACKGROUNDCarr BG, Caplan JM, Pryor JP, Branas CC. A meta-analysis of prehospital care times for trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Apr-Jun;10(2):198-206. doi: 10.1080/10903120500541324.
PMID: 16531377BACKGROUNDEisenberg MS, Bergner L, Hallstrom A. Cardiac resuscitation in the community. Importance of rapid provision and implications for program planning. JAMA. 1979 May 4;241(18):1905-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.241.18.1905.
PMID: 430772BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD. PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2024
First Posted
October 30, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
December 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no sharing of IPD as this is a retrospective cohort study without disclosure of individual patient details