NCT06665152

Brief Summary

To compare the postoperative pain in patients undergoing root canal instrumentation with two different file systems, WaveOne and ProTaper systems.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2022

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2022

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 26, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 30, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

October 26, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 28, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post operative pain

    Document and compare post-operative pain after root canal treatment, after using two different motorized file systems with different mechanisms. The Visual Analog scale (VAS) would be used to assess the pain. The patients would be guided in detail about the VAS scoring system and mark pain according to the readings on VAS.

    6 hours - 72 hours

Study Arms (2)

ProTaper Group

EXPERIMENTAL

These patients underwent root canal treatment due to pain in their molar teeth. The file system used in this arm was ProTaper (Dentsply), a rotary file system that moves in a complete 360° rotation and prepares a root canal.

Device: ProTaper File System

WaveOne Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

These patients underwent root canal treatment due to pain in their molar teeth. The file system used in this arm was WaveOne(Dentsply), a reciprocating file system that moves in 150° anticlockwise and 30° clockwise motion and prepares a root canal.

Device: WaveOne File System

Interventions

A rotary file system

ProTaper Group

A reciprocating file system

WaveOne Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with unremarkable/ noncontributory medical history
  • Healthy persons between the ages of 18 and 60 years
  • Maxillary and mandibular molar teeth diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
  • Patients not having taken any medication for 6 hours before treatment
  • No allergies to the drugs or dental material being used in the treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who had taken analgesics on anti-inflammatory drugs within the last 12 hours
  • Pregnant women and patients with immunocompromised health state
  • Patients having severe malocclusion associated with traumatic occlusion
  • Teeth with calcified canals
  • Teeth with periapical radiolucency
  • Teeth with root resorption
  • Teeth previously undergone root canal treatment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

28 MDC

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Nadeem A Rana, BDS, FCPS

    CMH LMC IOD

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patients did not know which file system was used in their treatment. The investigator was also not disclosed the intervention's name; rather, a code name was given to them. Outcomes accessor also did not know the exact name but was provided with a code name.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Comparison of postoperative pain in two groups of patients, who underwent root canal treatment with two different file systems. total 74 patients divided into two groups and given different interventional treatment to monitor pain after treatment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2024

First Posted

October 30, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 30, 2022

Study Completion

July 18, 2022

Last Updated

October 30, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

individual participant data to not be disclosed due to privacy reasons and data sharing for statistical analysis to be done with codenames.

Locations