Study Stopped
Industry partner decided not proceed
Avation Electric Stimulation System for Spinal Cord Injury Neurogenic Bladder
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess and optimize the Avation electric stimulation system output and electromyography (EMG) processing to stimulate the tibial nerve in people with chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) who have foot muscle atrophy and edema, both of which may affect proper device operations, to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of Avation Electric Stimulation System for bladder neuromodulation in people with SCI and identify barriers to implementation of the existing Avation Electric Stimulation System to help with developing it towards a new indication for routine care of SCI NB.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
March 28, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 years
October 15, 2024
March 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Consistency and Reliability of Stimulation Output as assessed by the percentage of sessions where the desired stimulation intensity is achieved (based on EMG waveform consistency) and time of day (morning, afternoon, evening)
Daily during the 4-week optimization period
EMG Waveform Quality as assessed by the number of successful EMG detections per session versus unsuccessful ones
Daily during the 4-week optimization period
Safety as assessed by the Pain score reported on the participant diary
Pain is scored on linear scale from 0(no pain)-10(worst pain), higher score indicating worse outcome
Continuous, daily monitoring throughout the 12-week study
Safety as assessed by the adverse events self reported by participant
patient-reported adverse events, including changes in spasticity, their bowel programs, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, and all other concerning changes
Continuous, daily monitoring throughout the 12-week study
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who adhere to the protocol as reported on the patient dairy
Weekly during the 12-week study
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in volume of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data
2 days per month for all three months
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in frequency of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data
2 days per month for all three months
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the number of episodes of incontinence reported in the voiding diary data
2 days per month for all three months
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in volume of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data
Once a month for all 3 months
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in frequency of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data
Once a month for all 3 months
Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the number of episodes of incontinence reported in the voiding diary data
Once a month for all 3 months
Implementation Barriers as assessed by a survey
end of study (12 weeks from baseline)
Patient-Reported Implementation Feedback as assessed by a survey
end of study (12 weeks from baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Patient-Reported Comfort as assessed by the participant survey
Daily during the 4-week optimization period
Patient-Reported Usability as assessed by the participant survey
Daily during the 4-week optimization period
Type and extent of adjustments (none, minor, major) required for System Operation needed for effective stimulation
End of the 4-week optimization period
Frequency of adaptations made to the device
End of the 4-week optimization period
Number of participants that had adaptations made to the device as assessed by a yes or no questionnaire
End of the 4-week optimization period
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Vivally system
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
During the first month, participants will do the stimulation at different time points: 1) supine while in bed, 2) seated in the morning, 3) sitting in the afternoon, and 4) sitting in the evening. Participants will measure the circumference of their ankle prior to each use. Participants will use the System for an additional 2 months with the preferred stimulation parameters based on the study team's recommendations from the first month of use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Injury level above T10.
- Diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (Performing intermittent catheterization).
- English or Spanish Speaker.
- Toe flexion upon tibial nerve stimulation with transcutaneous electric stimulation.
- No adverse events during the Vivally 5-minute trial
You may not qualify if:
- Intradetrusor Botulinum Toxin within six months.
- Presence of urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Known allergy to electrode or device materials.
- Known intolerance to leg electric stimulation
- Patient with no smartphone access.
- Pain/discomfort or adverse reaction with the trial of toe flexion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Argyrios Stampas, MD, MS
The University of Texas Health Science Center and Houston
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2024
First Posted
October 28, 2024
Study Start
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share