NCT06661057

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess and optimize the Avation electric stimulation system output and electromyography (EMG) processing to stimulate the tibial nerve in people with chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) who have foot muscle atrophy and edema, both of which may affect proper device operations, to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of Avation Electric Stimulation System for bladder neuromodulation in people with SCI and identify barriers to implementation of the existing Avation Electric Stimulation System to help with developing it towards a new indication for routine care of SCI NB.

Trial Health

45
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Timeline
7mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress72%
Dec 2024Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 15, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 28, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

March 28, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

spinal cord injurytibial nerve stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (13)

  • Consistency and Reliability of Stimulation Output as assessed by the percentage of sessions where the desired stimulation intensity is achieved (based on EMG waveform consistency) and time of day (morning, afternoon, evening)

    Daily during the 4-week optimization period

  • EMG Waveform Quality as assessed by the number of successful EMG detections per session versus unsuccessful ones

    Daily during the 4-week optimization period

  • Safety as assessed by the Pain score reported on the participant diary

    Pain is scored on linear scale from 0(no pain)-10(worst pain), higher score indicating worse outcome

    Continuous, daily monitoring throughout the 12-week study

  • Safety as assessed by the adverse events self reported by participant

    patient-reported adverse events, including changes in spasticity, their bowel programs, urinary tract infections, autonomic dysreflexia, and all other concerning changes

    Continuous, daily monitoring throughout the 12-week study

  • Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants who adhere to the protocol as reported on the patient dairy

    Weekly during the 12-week study

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in volume of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data

    2 days per month for all three months

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in frequency of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data

    2 days per month for all three months

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the number of episodes of incontinence reported in the voiding diary data

    2 days per month for all three months

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in volume of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data

    Once a month for all 3 months

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the changes in frequency of catheterization reported in the voiding diary data

    Once a month for all 3 months

  • Effectiveness for Bladder Control as assessed by the number of episodes of incontinence reported in the voiding diary data

    Once a month for all 3 months

  • Implementation Barriers as assessed by a survey

    end of study (12 weeks from baseline)

  • Patient-Reported Implementation Feedback as assessed by a survey

    end of study (12 weeks from baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Patient-Reported Comfort as assessed by the participant survey

    Daily during the 4-week optimization period

  • Patient-Reported Usability as assessed by the participant survey

    Daily during the 4-week optimization period

  • Type and extent of adjustments (none, minor, major) required for System Operation needed for effective stimulation

    End of the 4-week optimization period

  • Frequency of adaptations made to the device

    End of the 4-week optimization period

  • Number of participants that had adaptations made to the device as assessed by a yes or no questionnaire

    End of the 4-week optimization period

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Vivally system

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Vivally system stimulation

Interventions

During the first month, participants will do the stimulation at different time points: 1) supine while in bed, 2) seated in the morning, 3) sitting in the afternoon, and 4) sitting in the evening. Participants will measure the circumference of their ankle prior to each use. Participants will use the System for an additional 2 months with the preferred stimulation parameters based on the study team's recommendations from the first month of use.

Vivally system

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Injury level above T10.
  • Diagnosis of neurogenic bladder (Performing intermittent catheterization).
  • English or Spanish Speaker.
  • Toe flexion upon tibial nerve stimulation with transcutaneous electric stimulation.
  • No adverse events during the Vivally 5-minute trial

You may not qualify if:

  • Intradetrusor Botulinum Toxin within six months.
  • Presence of urinary tract infection (UTI) symptoms.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy to electrode or device materials.
  • Known intolerance to leg electric stimulation
  • Patient with no smartphone access.
  • Pain/discomfort or adverse reaction with the trial of toe flexion.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, NeurogenicSpinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSpinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Argyrios Stampas, MD, MS

    The University of Texas Health Science Center and Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2024

First Posted

October 28, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

March 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share