Development and Evaluation of an Educational Program for the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A controlled randomized study will be conducted to assess the effectiveness of the educational program before and after its implementation. An invitation to participate will be extended to physiotherapists interested in the training program. More than 64 physiotherapists will be randomly assigned to two equal groups. All participants will sign an informed consent form before the commencement of the study and will be informed about the study's content, duration, and their right to withdraw at any time. A structured educational program consisting of two parts will be developed, encompassing three core modules (Part A) on the management of chronic pain and three core modules (Part B) on communication skills and techniques. The modules in Part A of the educational program will focus on elucidating the neurophysiological mechanisms of pain, performing differential assessments based on chronic musculoskeletal pain phenotypes, and addressing and managing the factors contributing to patients' pain experiences and rehabilitation, with a particular emphasis on pain neuroscience education. The modules in Part B of the educational program will concentrate on the development of communication skills essential for effective interaction between patients and physiotherapists. The first group will complete all modules of the educational program, while the second group (control group) will only participate in the Part A education modules. The effectiveness of the program will be evaluated before and after its implementation by two independent examiners through the administration of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and the use of reliable and valid questionnaires and scales.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2025
CompletedMarch 19, 2025
March 1, 2025
3 months
October 19, 2024
March 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change on Baseline in Knowledge on Pain (the Knowledge and Perceptions about Pain (KNAP) Questionnaire at Week 5 and Week 12
The Knowledge and Perceptions about Pain (KNAP) Questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire. These questions are designed to assess various aspects of pain knowledge and beliefs, including the understanding of pain mechanisms, treatment approaches, and the impact of pain on individuals. It uses a Likert Scale (1 strongly disagree - 6 strongly agree). A higher KNAP score indicates that an individual's knowledge and attitudes about pain align more closely with current pain neuroscience.
Baseline, Week 5 and Week 16
Change on Baseline in Knowledge on Pain (The Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (R-NPQ) at Week 5 and Week 12
The revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (R-NPQ) developed to assess knowledge about the biological and physiological mechanisms of pain. Created by Dr. Lorimer Moseley in 2003 and revised by Ostelo et al. 2013. It evaluates understanding of how the nervous system and brain process pain. The total score is the sum of points from all correctly answered questions.
Baseline, Week 5 and Week 16
Change on Baseline in Empathy (The Toronto Components Empathy Questionnaire (ECQ) at Week 5 and Week 12
The Toronto Components Empathy Questionnaire (ECQ) is designed to assess different aspects of empathy, particularly in clinical settings (Spreng et al., 2009). Developed to measure how individuals perceive and respond to others' emotions. 26 items are allocated for professional life, with an equal distribution between cognitive and emotional empathy.
Baseline, Week 5 and Week 16
Change on Baseline in using of Share Decision-Making (Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) at Week 5 and Week 12
The SDM-Q-9 is a validated 9-item questionnaire designed to evaluate patients' perceptions of shared decision-making (SDM) (Kriston et al., 2010). Each item represents a distinct step in the SDM process and is rated on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree").
Baseline, Week 5 and Week 16
Change on Baseline in communication and clinical skills using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) at Week 5 and Week 12
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a comprehensive and structured assessment to evaluate clinical skills and competencies in healthcare professionals. OSCE will be used to assess the following focused clinical skills of participants: history taking, gathering information, information provided in patients, empathy, share decision-making, motivational interviewing.
Baseline, Week 5 and Week 16
Study Arms (2)
Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain + Communication skills
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete both parts of the educational program (assessment and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain and development of communication skills).
Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete only the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain portion of the educational program.
Interventions
Improving Knowledge and Skills in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (Assessment and Management)
Developing Communication Skills (Empathy, Motivational Interviewing, Shared Decision-making)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physiotherapists registered with the Panhellenic Association of Physiotherapists
- \>2 years of clinical experience with chronic musculoskeletal patients
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who have attended any educational program or seminar related to pain education, pain neuroscience education, or a training program related to improving communication skills lasting more than 6 hours
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Thessaly
Lamia, 35132, Greece
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Eleni V Kapreli, Prof
University of Thessaly
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2024
First Posted
October 22, 2024
Study Start
October 19, 2024
Primary Completion
January 11, 2025
Study Completion
January 11, 2025
Last Updated
March 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03