Effect of Intelligent Intervention Strategies on Self-efficacy and Hospital Readiness of Parents of Preterm Infants
1 other identifier
interventional
84
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
- 1.Construct intelligent management intervention plan for parents of preterm infants from hospital to family based on the medical and health system suitable for China's national conditions.
- 2.Clinical randomized controlled trials were conducted to verify and evaluate the feasibility and application effect of the intervention program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2025
CompletedOctober 10, 2024
September 1, 2024
12 months
September 29, 2024
October 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Parental readiness for discharge
The Discharge Readiness Scale - Parent Edition This scale was developed by Weiss Equals in 2006 to assess the discharge readiness of parents of hospitalized children aged 0-18 years. The scale consists of 5 dimensions and 29 items. The scale was scored on a Likert 10-level scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 10 for each item (" complete "to" incomplete ") and an overall score ranging from 0 to 290. The higher the score, the higher the parents' readiness to leave the hospital. Cronbach's α coefficient of the total volume table was 0.85, and Cronbach's α coefficient of each dimension (personal status of parents, personal status of children, knowledge, coping ability and expected support) was 0.71, 0.70, 0.85, 0.86 and 0.84, respectively, indicating good reliability. Chinese scholar Chen et al. Sinicized the scale and verified its good reliability and validity.
Upon admission and 24 hours before discharge
Parents' self-efficacy
First developed by German clinical and health psychologist Ralf Schwarzer in 1981, the General self-efficacy Scale has been translated into at least 25 languages and is widely used internationally. In this study, the Chinese version of GSEA was adopted, which was jointly revised by Zhang Jianxin and Schwarzer, and has been proved to have good reliability and validity. The scale has one dimension, a total of 10 items, grades 1 to 4, the test subjects according to their actual situation, "completely correct" counts for 4 points, "mostly correct" counts for 3 points, "somewhat correct" counts for 2 points, "completely incorrect" counts for 1 point, all items are positive, the lowest theoretical score is 10 points. The highest score was 40, and the higher the score, the better the general sense of self-efficacy.
The day of admission, 24 hours before discharge, and 1 month after discharge
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Anxiety
The day of admission, 24 hours before discharge, and 1 month after discharge
Growth and development indicators of premature infants
1 week, 1 month, 3 months after discharge
Readmission rate of preterm infants
One month after discharge
Parental care ability
The day of admission, 24 hours before discharge, and 1 month after discharge
Breastfeeding situation
1 week, 1 month, 3 months after discharge
Study Arms (2)
control group
NO INTERVENTIONRoutine nursing, discharge education
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntelligent interventions to enhance parents' hospital discharge readiness and self-efficacy.
Interventions
The experimental group was given intervention measures. According to the general data survey, discharge readiness and self-efficacy assessment, parents were divided into low, middle and high discharge readiness groups and low, middle and high self-efficacy groups, respectively, using WeChat mini programs to push different content.
According to the results of self-efficacy and anxiety assessment, different interventions were based on different scores. Give encouragement and affirmation to parents with low anxiety and high self-efficacy. Parents with high anxiety and low self-efficacy should push stress relief methods such as mindfulness relaxation therapy in time. And through the wechat mini program to provide parents to respond to the pressure of the problem, the medical staff to give timely feedback.
Carry out offline science popularization education and specialized training, and highly qualified specialist doctors and nurses will train parents, and parents will be assessed after training, and personalized guidance will be given according to the weak points of each parent\'s assessment.
Support and encouragement for parents continue from admission to discharge, so that parents feel that even after discharge, there are people to accompany and support them.
Since parents and children are separated during the hospitalization of preterm infants, we will create an environment where parents still play the role of parents, and stimulate parental competence through kangaroo care, parental touch, and breastfeeding.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Lin K, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Zheng W, Chen Z, Lin Z, Zhang H, Lin N. Implementing intelligent nursing interventions to enhance self-efficacy and hospital readiness in parents of preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e101498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101498.
PMID: 40812802DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2024
First Posted
October 10, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
October 31, 2025
Last Updated
October 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share