Interest of Placental Alpha-microglobulin-1 Detection Test to Assess Risk of Premature Delivery in Reunion Island
PARTOSURE-OI
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prematurity is the leading cause of mortality and perinatal morbidity. Despite the many preventive measures and use of tocolytic therapy, the incidence of premature births has not decreased in recent decades. In 2010 the preterm birth rate (single child, born alive) was still 5.5% in France and 11% in the population of Reunion. In 50% of cases, premature birth is related to spontaneous premature labor layout without rupture of amniotic membranes, called threat of premature birth.The threat of premature birth, defined by the combination of cervical modifications and regular and painful uterine contractions from 22 weeks of amenorrhea and 36 weeks of amenorrhea + 6days, is the major cause of hospitalization in pathological pregnancies services. But all threat of premature delivery situations do not cause premature delivery. In our service, only 30% of patients hospitalized for threat of premature delivery give birth prematurely in accordance with published international data. The diagnosis of threat of premature delivery is difficult and it is still not possible to differentiate a "false labour" of a "real labour". Currently the diagnosis of threat of premature delivery in routine is based on the combination of vaginal examination, the ultrasound, cervical length, but this strategy lacks specificity. In absence of prognostic tool for predicting more reliably the risk of premature delivery in situation of threat of premature delivery, the medical cares are maximalist.: hospitalization, conducting paraclinical investigations, prescription of tocolytics treatments and conducting antenatal corticotherapy. it seems particularly necessary to identify more efficient prognostic criteria that the clinic and ultrasound for judging the severity of threat of premature delivery in other words to predict the risk of premature delivery to adapt and adjust the care of patients after diagnosis of threat of premature delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 16, 2016
September 1, 2016
3 years
September 8, 2016
September 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficient predictivity for premature delivery assessed by Placental Alpha-microglobulin-1 detection test compared with the cervical length
Occurrence of premature delivery within 7 days of diagnosis depending on the positive / negative status for the Placental Alpha-microglobulin-1 detection test versus cervical length
Childbirth
Study Arms (1)
Threat of premature delivery
EXPERIMENTAL* Perform detection test of Placental Alpha-Microglobulin-1, fetal Fibronectin and phosphorylated Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1ph by vaginal swabbing; * Collection of clinical data, laboratory data and treatment of obstetric care in the delivery room during childbirth for all included subjects
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients received in programmed or emergency consultation;
- Pregnant, between 24 weeks of amenorrhea and 33 weeks of amenorrhea + 6 days;
- With painful regular uterine contractions confirmed by monitoring;
- Patient affiliated to a social security scheme;
- Informed consent signed by patient if adult or by legal representant for minor subjects
You may not qualify if:
- cervical cerclage placement;
- proved vaginal infection and/or vaginal ongoing treatment;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de La Réunion - site Nord
Saint-Denis, Reunion Island, 97400, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vanessa BENASSI, MD
CHU de La Réunion
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2016
First Posted
September 16, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share