Effectiveness of Desensitisation and Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome With Nosiplastic Pain
Determination of the Effectiveness of Desensitisation and Pain Neuroscience Training in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome With Nosiplastic Pain Phenotype
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of our study was to determine the effectiveness of desensitisation and pain neuroscience education in a group of patients with mixed phenotype pain (neuropathic and nosiplastic).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 25, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2027
August 12, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.5 years
October 8, 2024
August 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pressure Paın Threshold Measurement
The pressure pain threshold (PPT), the minimum amount of pressure at which the pressure sensation changes to pain, is measured with an electronic algometer (median nerve, ulnar nerve and radial nerve, C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint level (proximal), and tibialis anterior). Participants are asked to report when the sensation changes from pressure to pain. The mean of the three trials is calculated (with a 30 s rest interval in between).
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire - Symptom Severity Scale
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire - Symptom Severity Scale is an 11-item questionnaire used to assess symptom severity in individuals with CTS. Each item is scored from 1 to 5. Scores range from 1 (no symptoms) to 5 (worst symptoms). The patient's symptom severity score is the average score of 11 items.
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire - Functional Status Scale
Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire - Functional Status Scale is an 8-item questionnaire used to assess the functional status of patients with CTS. Each item is scored from 1 to 5. Scores range from 1 (no functional deficit) to 5 (worst possible function). The patient's functional status score is the average of all 8 items.
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Pain Catastrophising Scale
The Catastrophising Pain Scale (PCS) is used to measure catastrophising in response to pain through 13 statements with four possible options from 1 "never" to 4 "always". Higher scores indicate greater catastrophised pain.
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
It is a 17-question scale. The scale has a 4-point Likert scale (1= Strongly disagree, 4= Strongly agree). After reversing items 4, 8, 12 and 16, a total score is calculated. The person receives a total score between 17-68. A high score on the scale indicates a high level of kinesiophobia.
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Numerical Rating Scale
Patients rate the current pain intensity from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain").
[at the beginning of the study] [At the end of 6 weeks] [3 months later]
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Cold Pain Threshold
2 minutes
Hot Pain Threshold
2 minutes
Pressure Pain Threshold
3 minutes
Mechanical Pain Threshold
3 minutes
Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia
3 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Group 1 (desensitisation)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 will receive desensitisation.
Group 2 (desensitisation and pain neuroscience education)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2 will receive desensitisation and pain neuroscience education.
Interventions
This technique is utilized to decrease, or normalize, the body's response to particular sensations.
PNE is an educational intervention aiming to alter a patient's beliefs and cognitions regarding their pain experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being diagnosed with CTS
- Being suitable for the nosiplastic pain phenotype
- Being between the ages of 18-65
- Volunteering to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Having systemic inflammatory disease
- Having a disease that may cause polyneuropathy such as diabetes mellitus
- Having a pacemaker
- Having a disease affecting the central nervous system
- Having cervical radiculopathy
- History of previous operation or local steroid injection due to CTS
- Hypersensitivity to heat and cold
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kutahya Health Science University
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Phd
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2024
First Posted
October 10, 2024
Study Start
October 25, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 25, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 10, 2027
Last Updated
August 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08