NCT06627699

Brief Summary

In an effort to satisfy regulatory requirements for post-market surveillance of product safety and efficacy, a representative sample of patients will be recruited for prospective monitoring.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
23mo left

Started Nov 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress45%
Nov 2024Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 3, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2024

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2024

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2027

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 4, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

RegistryPrimary TKATotal Knee ArthroplastyTotal Knee Replacement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Device Survivorship

    Revision / re-operation post-operatively due to device / device composite failure. An anticipated benefit of the device is that it is more conforming at higher degrees of flexion, which could potentially result in reduced polyethylene wear and improved survivorship over the longer-term. To assess this aspect of the device in addition to safety over the short-, intermediate- and long-term, survivorship analyses will be conducted at the targeted follow-up landmark timepoints. There will be 3 survivorship endpoints: * Revision of any component (including insert) for any reason * Revision of any component (including insert) for any reason except infection

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Original Knee Society Scale (KSS)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

  • Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global-10)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

  • Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Radiography (plain-film radiography as per standard of care - independent collective site assessment)

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

  • Adverse Events

    3-6 Weeks, 3 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months, 24 Months

Study Arms (1)

Patients receiving the Maxx Freedom Total Knee System for primary TKA

TARGETED PATIENTS Adult male and female patients greater than 18 years of age Candidate for primary TKA GENERAL EXCLUSIONS Active infection Revision / conversion TKA (Prior UKA or HTO)

Device: Total Knee Arthroplasty

Interventions

Post-Market Surveillance of the Freedom Total Knee System for Primary TKA

Patients receiving the Maxx Freedom Total Knee System for primary TKA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The registry population will consist of adult male and female subjects who are suffering from moderate to severe symptoms of the following diagnoses: painful degenerative knee disease.

You may qualify if:

  • Candidates for this registry must meet ALL of the following criteria:
  • Patient is \> 18 years of age
  • Patient has failed attempts at non-operative conservative therapy
  • Patient has participated in the informed consent process and signed an IRB approved informed consent
  • Patient is scheduled to undergo unilateral or bilateral primary TKA of the knee

You may not qualify if:

  • Candidates will be excluded from the evaluation if ANY of the following apply:
  • Patients with previous TKA, UKA, HTO or knee fusion of the indicated knee
  • Patients that have undergone previous surgery of indicated knee for tumor, trauma or fracture
  • Evidence of active or suspected (systemic or local) infection at time of surgery
  • Other significant disabling problems from the musculoskeletal system than in the knee (i.e.: muscular dystrophy, polio, neuropathic joints)
  • Patients with or having; malignancy - active malignancy, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, immunologically suppressed, sickle cell anemia and systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Patients with neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit
  • Women who are pregnant
  • Prisoner or transient
  • Recent history of known narcotic abuse
  • Any significant psychological disturbance past or present, that could impair the consent process or ability to complete subject self-report questionnaires

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Ascentist Healthcare

Leawood, Kansas, 66211, United States

Location

South Texas Bone & Joint Institute

San Antonio, Texas, 78249, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):165-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93.

    PMID: 18467932BACKGROUND
  • Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Barfod KW, Husted H, Troelsen A. Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

    PMID: 26937689BACKGROUND
  • Shim J, Hamilton DF. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 Global Health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):832-837. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1543.R1.

    PMID: 31256677BACKGROUND
  • Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: A Short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jun;474(6):1461-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4719-1. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

    PMID: 26926773BACKGROUND
  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.

    PMID: 2805470BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Study Officials

  • Asit Shah, MD, PhD

    Chief of Orthopedics, Englewood Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Nach Dave, MS, RPh

CONTACT

Corey Perine, BS, MBA

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
2 Years
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2024

First Posted

October 4, 2024

Study Start

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations