NCT06880497

Brief Summary

Some patients complain of articular noise (such as clicking, snapping, cracking or popping) after a total knee replacement. Controversy remains about whether there is a correlation between articular noise and worse outcomes following a knee replacement. A study by Nam et al. on 1540 patients revealed an association between noise and residual symptoms 30 days after they received a total knee replacement. Conversely, a study by Kuriyama et al. on 60 patients revealed no correlation between noise and patient satisfaction after 1 year of receiving a total knee replacement. The incidence of noise following a knee replacement has rarely been studied as a primary outcome. Like pain, it could be considered an important patient-reported outcome to assess patient satisfaction. The study aims to compare the prevalence of patient-perceived noise of an ultra-congruent total knee prosthesis (Score 2, Amplitude) versus a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis (Anatomic, Amplitude).

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
32mo left

Started Dec 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Dec 2025Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 4, 2025

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 24, 2025

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

March 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

NoiseArticular noiseTotal Knee ArthroplastyTKATotal Knee ReplacementTKR

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prevalence of articular noise

    The primary outcome is the prevalence of patients with articular noise at 2 years, evaluated by the Investigator during the follow-up visit through clinical examination and using the following question (Q1): Q1: Do you hear noise? Never, rarely, sometimes, often, extremely often

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Noise characterisation: Discomfort

    1 year and 2 years

  • Noise characterisation: Type

    1 and 2 years

  • Noise characterisation: Location

    1 and 2 years

  • Noise characterisation: impact on quality of life

    1 and 2 years

  • Patient reported outcome score

    1 and 2 years

Other Outcomes (9)

  • Forgotten joint

    1 and 2 years

  • Patient reported outcome score

    1 and 2 years

  • Knee mobility: Maximum flexion

    3 weeks, 3 months, 1 years and 2 years

  • +6 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

UC TKA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Score II® is a primary cruciate-sacrificing TKA, with a single-radius femoral component that articulates in an ultra-congruent (UC) mobile-bearing tibial insert. The mobile-bearing tibial insert has high anterior and posterior borders to avoid anterior subluxation of the femoral condyles during knee flexion and a concave articular surface with a radius of curvature that matches that of the femoral component in the sagittal plane to ensure high congruence. The Score II® UC TKA comprises eight sizes and offers the choice of using a cemented or uncemented version. In this study, only the cemented version will be used.

Procedure: total knee arthroplasty

PS TKA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Anatomic® is a primary PS TKA with a fixed-bearing polyethylene insert. The femoral component has a cam design that engages on a tibial post to provide anterior-posterior stability during flexion. The Anatomic® PS TKA comprises nine cemented sizes. In this study, only the cemented version will be used. The Anatomic® PS TKA comprises nine cemented sizes.

Procedure: total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

Replacement of knee articulating surface for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis.

Also known as: knee surgery, knee replacement
PS TKAUC TKA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients receiving a primary TKA
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patients affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patients willing and able to comply with study protocol requirements based on the investigator's judgment.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of knee surgery on the concerned/studied knee (except arthroscopic surgery)
  • Patients presenting coronal deformities \> 20°, varus laxity \> 10° and/or valgus laxity \> 15°
  • Patients receiving revision TKA
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Patients with protected status under articles L1121-6, LL121-8 and L1122-2 of the French Public Health Code
  • Unable to comply with study procedures, based on the investigator's judgment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St Marguerite clinic

Auxerre, 89000, France

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Taniguchi H, Itoh M, Yoshimoto N, Itou J, Kuwashima U, Okazaki K. Noise after total knee arthroplasty has limited effect on joint awareness and patient-reported clinical outcomes: retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3134-7.

  • Nam D, Barrack T, Nunley RM, Barrack RL. What Is the Frequency of Noise Generation in Modern Knee Arthroplasty and Is It Associated With Residual Symptoms? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4701-y.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arthroplasty, ReplacementArthroplastyOrthopedic ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativePlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis Implantation

Central Study Contacts

Stéphane Van DRIESSCHE, MD

CONTACT

Aurélia Cassany

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective, monocentric, comparative, 1:1 randomized, single-blinded study evaluating the prevalence of articular noise following primary TKA using UC versus PS implants.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Posted

March 17, 2025

Study Start

December 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

March 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations