A Prototype AI Algorithm Versus Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Criteria in Diagnosing HCC on CT
Hepatocellular
A Prototype Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Versus Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Criteria in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Computed Tomography: a Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to prospective validate this AI algorithm in comparison with the current standard of radiological reporting in a randomized manner in the at-risk population undergoing triphasic contrast CT. This research project is totally independent and separated from the actual clinical reporting of the CT scan by the duty radiologist. The primary study outcome is to compare the diagnostic performance of the prototype AI algorithm versus LI-RADS criteria in determining HCC on CT in the at-risk population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Nov 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2026
October 29, 2024
October 1, 2023
3 years
October 1, 2024
October 25, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy for HCC
Number of participants diagnosed with HCC using a composite clinical reference standard. A lesion will be considered positive for HCC based on histology (biopsy, surgical resection or explant) or achieving LR-5 criteria in subsequent imaging. A lesion will be considered negative for HCC if it demonstrated stability at imaging for at least 12 months, unequivocal spontaneous reduction, or disappearance in the absence of tumor treatment.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Other diagnostic performance parameters for HCC
12 months
Interpretation time
12 months
Occurrence of technical failures
12 months
Study Arms (2)
Prototype AI algorithm
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn-house prototype deep learning artificial intelligence algorithm
LI_RADS interpretation
PLACEBO COMPARATORLI-RADS criteria will be assessed independently by two specified abdominal radiologists with at least 10 years of experience in cross-sectional abdominal imaging
Interventions
Developed by the University of Hong Kong
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) was established to standardize the lexicon, interpretation and communication of radiological findings related to HCC
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Age \>=18 years.
- \. Defined as the at-risk population requiring regular liver ultrasonography surveillance.
- These include:
- Cirrhotic patients of any disease etiology,
- Chronic hepatitis B patients of age ≥40 years for men, age ≥50 years for women or with a family history of HCC.
- \. At least one new-onset focal liver nodule detected on liver ultrasonography.
You may not qualify if:
- \. Liver nodules of \<1 cm. Currently such nodules are not reported using LI-RADS criteria but are recommended for a repeat scan in 3-6 months. In patients with multiple liver nodules, the largest nodule will be assessed.
- \. Patients with contraindications for contrast CT imaging, including a history of contrast anaphylaxis and impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate \<30 ml/min).
- \. Patients with prior transarterial chemoembolization or other interventional procedures with intrahepatic injection of lipiodol. Lipiodol is extremely hyperdense on computed tomography and will preclude objective interpretation. Such patients were also excluded in the development of our prototype AI algorithm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Education University of Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Department of Medicine and Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wai-Kay Seto, MD
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Both radiologists will be blinded to the clinical characteristics and subsequent management of participants, with any discordance in assessment resolved by consensus before reaching a final decision.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2024
First Posted
October 3, 2024
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Last Updated
October 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-10