NCT06620705

Brief Summary

It is unknown whether left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) or biventricular pacing best prevents or reverses left ventricular (LV) adverse remodelling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who require ventricular pacing or CRT. This randomized non-inferiority cross-over trial will compare left ventricular end-systolic volume change and secondary endpoints between LBBAP and biventricular pacing in patients with AF and LV dysfunction.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
29mo left

Started Sep 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress41%
Sep 2024Oct 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2024

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2024

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2027

Expected
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pacingcardiac resynchronization therapyleft bundle branch area pacingconduction system pacingheart failureheart block

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) change

    Left ventricular end-systolic volume change measured by echocardiography

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Change in New York Heart Association functional class

    6 months

  • Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire

    6 months

  • Change in 6-minute walking distance

    6 months

  • Change in QRS duration

    6 months

  • Change in vectorcardiographic QRS area

    6 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Left bundle branch area pacing

EXPERIMENTAL

6 months of left bundle branch area pacing.

Device: Left bundle branch area pacing

Biventricular pacing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

6 months of biventricular pacing using a RV apex lead and LV lead in the coronary sinus.

Device: Biventricular pacing

Interventions

Pacing of the left bundle branch area using a transvenous pacemaker lead

Also known as: Conduction system pacing, Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Left bundle branch area pacing

Pacing of the right and left ventricle using transvenous pacemaker leads

Also known as: Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Biventricular pacing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Adults ≥18 years with permanent AF and LVEF \< 50% who either require ventricular pacing because of bradycardia including patients undergoing AV junction ablation, or have an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  • Expected percentage of ventricular pacing \> 40%
  • ≥ 3 months of heart failure medication optimization
  • Of note, patients who already have a device, but require an upgrade to a CRT device, can also be included

You may not qualify if:

  • A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Pregnancy or active pregnancy wish
  • Not eligible for implantation of an RV lead, LBBAP lead, or LV lead in the coronary sinus
  • Recent valve intervention/surgery or acute myocardial infarction (\< 6 months)
  • NYHA functional class IV heart failure, left ventricular assist device or cardiac transplant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus N, Aarhus N, DK-8200, Denmark

NOT YET RECRUITING

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2300 RC, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureHeart Block

Interventions

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectric Stimulation TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Sebastiaan Piers, MD, PhD

    Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sebastiaan RD Piers, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patient will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The assessor of the ECG endpoints and echocardiographic endpoints will be blinded to the treatment allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Randomized patient and assessor blinded non-inferiority cross-over trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2024

First Posted

October 1, 2024

Study Start

September 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The data will be shared with other researchers whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
After completion of the study and publication, the data will be shared with other researchers whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.
Access Criteria
Whenever reasonable and of potential benefit for patients.

Locations