NCT06620549

Brief Summary

Gastric ultrasound is a quick and non-invasive tool to evaluate gastric content. Emptying of gastric content can be affected after abdominal surgery leading to the inability of tolerating oral foods. Gastric content can be assessed by gastric ultrasound and nurses were recently trained to do so in healthy volunteers; however, feasibility of nurse-performed gastric ultrasound after major abdominal surgery is not investigated yet. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of nurse-performed gastric point-of-care ultrasound after major gastro-intestinal surgery.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
135

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 16, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 16, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 24, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of practicality

    Practicality of gastric ultrasound will be measured by the length in minutes.

    through study completion, for 6 months

  • Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of usability

    The Dutch-System Usability Scale will be used to assess usability

    through study completion, for 6 months

  • Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by patients

    Acceptability will be measured by the patients' perspective towards undergoing gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.

    through study completion, for 6 months

  • Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of demand

    Demand will be measured by indications for gastric ultrasound and the change for successful image acquisition. Indications involve a description of clinical signs that were present during the gastric ultrasound performance. Each attempt for gastric ultrasound will be counted, afterwards adequate images will be counted. Change for succesfull image acquisition wil be calculated by adequate images divided by numbers of attemps. Both values indicate the demand according to its definition

    through study completion, for 6 months

  • Feasibility of Gastric ultrasound in terms of nurses accuracy and nurses confidence

    The nurses accuracy and nurses' confidence to perform gastric ultrasound will be assessed. Accuracy will be measured by validating the ultrasound findings independently by expert sonographers and the nurses for their peers, determining inter-rater reliability.

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by nurses

    Acceptability will be measured by the nurses' perspective towards the acceptability of gastric ultrasound. This is measured with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability-based (TFA) questionnaire which is modified to assess the acceptability of gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.

    through study completion, for 6 months

Study Arms (1)

Patients after gastro-intestinal surgery

Postoperative patients after gastro-intestinal surgery (e.g. liver, pancreatic, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery)

Diagnostic Test: gastric ultrasonograppy

Interventions

Patients will be scanned in both supine and right lateral decubitus position (RLD)s. If the antrum is visible, it will be judged if the antrum is empty in both positions or the antrum is empty in supine position and fluid apparent in RLD position suggesting a low fluid volume (\<1,5 ml/Kg). The third option is fluid apparent in both supine and RLD position, suggesting a higher fluid volume (\>1,5ml/Kg) and the last option is solid food in one or both positions.

Patients after gastro-intestinal surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients are selected from a surgical ward, patients recover from liver surgery, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery, pancreatic surgery, or other gastro-intestinal abdominal procedures

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (\>18 years)
  • Underwent gastrointestinal surgery:
  • partial liver resection,
  • colorectal resection,
  • HIPEC,
  • pancreatic procedures including Whipple procedures for pancreatic cancer or pancreatic disorders,
  • other gastro- intestinal abdominal procedures such as resections of sarcomas, correction of herniation.
  • Obtained written informed consent.
  • Admitted for at least 3 days.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with open abdominal wounds or with abdominal pain hindering adequate gastric ultrasound
  • patients with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy catheter

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

RadboudUMC

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GE, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, 6525GE, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):12-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu151. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

    PMID: 24893784BACKGROUND
  • Lamm R, Collins M, Bloom J, Joel M, Iosif L, Park D, Reny J, Schultz S, Yeo CJ, Beausang D, Schwenk ES, Costanzo C, Phillips BR. Postoperative Handheld Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Delayed Bowel Function. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):554-559. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000536. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

    PMID: 36602237BACKGROUND
  • Lamm R, Bloom J, Collins M, Goldman D, Beausang D, Costanzo C, Schwenk ES, Phillips B. A Role for Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Postoperative Delayed Gastrointestinal Functioning. J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

    PMID: 35339785BACKGROUND
  • Brotfain E, Erblat A, Luft P, Elir A, Gruenbaum BF, Livshiz-Riven I, Koyfman A, Fridrich D, Koyfman L, Friger M, Grivnev A, Zlotnik A, Klein M. Nurse-performed ultrasound assessment of gastric residual volume and enteral nasogastric tube placement in the general intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103183. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

    PMID: 34924254BACKGROUND
  • Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Cubillos J, Ye XY, Perlas A. Anesthesiologists' learning curves for bedside qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content: a cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9974-y. Epub 2013 May 24.

    PMID: 23703533BACKGROUND
  • Cozza V, Barberis L, Altieri G, Donatelli M, Sganga G, La Greca A. Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting by point-of-care gastric ultrasound: can we improve complications and length of stay in emergency surgery? A cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Aug 31;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01428-0.

    PMID: 34465303BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Harm HJ van Noort, PhD

    Radboud University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Harm H.J. van Noort, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2024

First Posted

October 1, 2024

Study Start

April 22, 2024

Primary Completion

November 16, 2024

Study Completion

December 24, 2024

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Locations