Randomized Study of a Dematerialized Management for Post-Emergency Gynecological Follow-Up
GYNAB
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The GYNAB study aims to compare patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes between dematerialized post-emergency gynecological follow-up using a connected health app and traditional in-person follow-up. Conducted by Drs. Laëtitia CAMPIN and Louis MARCELLIN at Hôpital Cochin, it is sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. The main objective is to assess patient satisfaction at day 7 on a scale from 0 to 10, considering symptom management, follow-up quality, and task performance. Secondary objectives include comparing satisfaction at day 28, PROM-ED scores for symptom relief, understanding, reassurance, and care planning at days 7 and 28, hospitalization rates, unscheduled consultations, surgical interventions, total hospital time by day 28, and physician satisfaction at 28 days. This randomized trial involves women aged 18-60 needing follow-up for conditions like genital infections, non-complicated ectopic pregnancies, unlocated pregnancy, first trimester metrorrhagia, miscarriages , and severe vomiting before 12 weeks. Inclusion criteria are women aged 18-60 needing specified follow-up. Exclusion criteria are severe clinical intolerance, severe criteria ultrasound findings, non-French speakers, and inability to use digital applications. The intervention group uses a connected health app for data collection and communication, logging symptoms and test results, with medical team notifications for urgent updates. The control group receives traditional in-person follow-up with scheduled consultations and emergency contact information. The study hypothesizes that digital follow-up will improve patient experience, reduce hospital visits, and provide comparable or superior satisfaction and clinical outcomes. The results could promote broader digital health adoption in various medical fields.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2027
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
2 years
September 24, 2024
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Patient Satisfaction
Measure of overall patient satisfaction with post-emergency gynecological follow-up, assessed on a scale from 0 to 10. This includes symptom management, follow-up quality, and the ability to perform requested tasks.
7 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Overall Patient Satisfaction at 28 Days
28 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
PROM-ED Score for Symptom Relief
7 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
PROM-ED Score for Symptom Relief at 28 Days
28 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
PROM-ED Score for Understanding
7 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
PROM-ED Score for Understanding at 28 days
28 days after initial emergency gynecological consultation
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Traditional In-Person Follow-Up
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm will receive traditional in-person follow-up at the hospital. They will have scheduled consultations at the emergency department where they will undergo necessary evaluations and receive instructions for follow-up visits. Contact information for urgent needs will also be provided, allowing patients to reach medical services 24/7 if required
Dematerialized Follow-Up
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive post-emergency gynecological follow-up at home using a connected health app.
Interventions
The app will facilitate data collection and communication, including logging of vital signs, symptoms (such as pain, bleeding, and vomiting), and uploading of test results. Medical professionals will review the health data twice daily and provide care instructions through instant messaging. The app will also alert the medical team of any urgent updates or deviations from expected health patterns
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18 and 60 years
- No consultation at the gynecological emergency department in the previous month and/or for the same pregnancy.
- Requires post-emergency follow-up for one of the following clinical conditions:
- Genital Infections (IGH): Acute pelvic pain with or without leucorrhea requiring antibiotic treatment
- Ectopic Pregnancy (GEU): Non-complicated, not ruptured, no significant effusion on ultrasound, GEU \< 4 cm, no cardiac activity if embryo present, stable hemodynamic state, HCG \< 5000, compliant patient, no contraindications for Methotrexate
- Early Pregnancy of Uncertain Viability (GLI): Early stage with a positive bHCG test, no visible gestational sac on ultrasound, no effusion, bHCG \< 1500 IU
- Missed Miscarriage (GAM): Confirmed by an intrauterine gestational sac ≥ 25mm without an embryo or an intrauterine gestational sac with an embryo ≥ 7mm without visible cardiac activity, treated with Misoprostol
- First Trimester Bleeding (MTRt1): Moderate vaginal bleeding with an ongoing intrauterine pregnancy without hemodynamic instability
- Hyperemesis Gravidarum (VG): Severe vomiting before 12 weeks of pregnancy without severe criteria necessitating emergency follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Severe clinical intolerance, defined by:
- Signs of severe sepsis with unstable hemodynamics (TA with SBP \< 90 mmHg and FC ≥ 105 bpm)
- Abdominal defense or contracture
- Pain not controlled by level 1 analgesics (EVA \<7)
- Severe dehydration defined by a body weight loss of more than 10%
- Total food intolerance due to vomiting necessitating hospitalization
- Uncontrolled active hemorrhage
- Significant ultrasound findings:
- Tubo-ovarian abscess ≥ 3 cm
- Significant intra-abdominal effusion
- Non-French speaking patients
- Inability to download or use the digital application due to precarious or isolated digital circumstances
- Refusal to sign consent form
- Patients under legal guardianship or court protection (tutelage, curatorship, or guardianship)
- Patients not affiliated with a social security system
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Louis MARCELLIN, MD, PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laetitia CAMPIN, MD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2024
First Posted
September 27, 2024
Study Start
June 30, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04