The Effect of Different Types of Focus Instructions in Parkinson's Rehabilitation
Effects of an External and Combined Focus of Attention-Instructed Exercise Program on Postural Stability and Dual-Task Walking in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Assessor-Blinded, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Parkinson's disease is the most common progressive neurodegenerative movement disorder. Common movement impairments in Parkinson's include balance and walking difficulties. These impairments lead to falls, increased levels of functional dependency, and a decrease in quality of life. Exercise in Parkinson's patients improves their functional symptoms in daily life, enhancing both motor and non-motor skills, and consequently increases their quality of life. Recently, various additional methods have been developed to increase the effectiveness of exercise in Parkinson's rehabilitation and to contribute to motor skills. Focus of attention instructions are fundamental concepts in motor function learning. External focus of attention has been shown to facilitate motor function development, reduce postural instability, and improve dual-task walking by being easier to remember. In Parkinson's patients who experience freezing phenomena, internal focus of attention instructions enhance walking stability and movement control, thereby reducing the risk of falls. However, there are no studies on the combined focus of attention instructions in Parkinson's patients. This study is designed as a randomized controlled, single-blind, prospective trial to examine the effects of a combination of internal and external focus of attention instructions on walking, balance parameters, quality of life, and patient satisfaction levels, taking into account the presence of freezing phenomena in Parkinson's patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 11, 2025
February 1, 2025
4 months
September 24, 2024
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Berg Balance Scale
This is a 14-item scale that measures the ability to maintain balance during dynamic tasks. It is rated on a scale of 0 to 4 points, with a maximum total score of 56. As the total score decreases, the risk of falling increases. 0 to 20 points: Indicates that the individual is dependent on a wheelchair and has a 100% risk of falling. 21 to 40 points: Suggests that the individual has a moderate risk of falling and may be able to walk with assistance. 41 to 56 points: Indicates that the individual can ambulate independently with a low risk of falling.
baseline, six weeks after the baseline
Time Up and Go Dual Task
The test assesses balance, walking, and functionality during activities. The TUG-Dual Task evaluates walking abilities and attention management by asking participants to solve a simple math problem or perform another cognitive task while walking. Patients will be assessed for functionality, walking speeds, and balance evaluations. If the duration lasts more than 12 seconds, there is a risk of falling.
baseline, six weeks after the baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39)
baseline, six weeks after the baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Likert Scale Questionnaire
baseline, six weeks after the baseline
Study Arms (3)
Group1: Exercises with External Attention Focus Instructions
EXPERIMENTALThroughout the descriped exercise program, the physiotherapist will guide the participants using only external focus of attention instructions. Example: Go over the red block. (10 rounds )
Group 2: Exercises with Combined Attention Focus Instructions
EXPERIMENTALThe exercise program given to the External Focus of Attention group will also be administered to this group. While guiding the exercises, the physiotherapist will use a combination of both external and internal focus of attention instructions to direct the participants. Example: Pass over the red block by pulling your knees up as high as you can.
Grup 3: Exercises with no instructions (Control Group)
EXPERIMENTALThe same exercise program given to the other groups will also be administered to this group but no instruction will be given to this group. Example: Take 10 turn around the track, passing over the blocks
Interventions
All participants will perform a total body stretching exercise for 10 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of obstacle course navigation, 10 minutes of balance training (including tandem walking, balance board exercises, single-leg balance, and two-legged reaching exercises), and will conclude with 10 minutes of strength training exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hoehn and Yahr Stage II or III
- Individuals between the ages of 50 and 70 who can walk independently but have balance disorders
- Having a score between 21-56 on the Berg Balance Scale
- Having a score between 24-30 on the Mini Mental State Test
- Having agreed to participate in the study (Not having a freezing phenomenon)
- Being in the Medication-on period
You may not qualify if:
- Having malignancy and metabolic diseases
- Having had Cerebrovascular Accident before
- Other neurological disease history
- Presence of cognitive problems
- Presence of visual or hearing disorders
- Presence of deep brain pacemaker
- Presence of freezing phenomenon (persons with Freezing of Gait Questionnaire FOG-Q above zero)
- Presence of dyskinesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Atafiz Tıp Merkezi
Istanbul, 34636, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leyla Koçak, PT
Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Pelin Pişirici, PT, PhD
Bahcesehir University, Faculty of Health Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant will do the evaluations but no info will be given about the randomization adn groups.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, PT, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2024
First Posted
September 26, 2024
Study Start
January 30, 2025
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share