NCT07068217

Brief Summary

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, leading to motor symptoms such as resting tremor, freezing episodes, gait disturbances, rigidity, and bradykinesia. It is estimated that approximately 6.1 million people worldwide live with PD. With disease progression, freezing episodes and gait impairments intensify, significantly limiting independence and increasing both fall risk and mortality. Although a definitive cure is lacking, symptom management relies on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. In PD patients, adaptability to environmental changes and the ability to process sensory inputs and generate motor responses become impaired. Therefore, sensory re-education using auditory, somatosensory, or visual cues is employed. External cues support motor learning by facilitating initiation and maintenance of movement. By promoting cortical reorganization, these cues can improve gait quality, reduce freezing severity, and enhance participation in daily life. A commonly used method in this context is Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS). Administered with metronome beats or music, RAS provides external cues via the auditory system to reorganize gait patterns. In patients experiencing freezing, motor blocks during gait can be overcome through rhythmic stimulation. Numerous studies have reported that RAS improves gait speed, step length, and cadence. Despite its benefits, there is a paucity of methodologically robust, standardized trials evaluating the effects of RAS on real-world symptoms such as gait disturbances and freezing. Therefore, there is a clear need for structured interventions based on metronome-driven rhythmic cues and clinical trials assessing their impact. Furthermore, investigating feasibility in home settings via telerehabilitation is valuable for enhancing accessibility of such interventions. Purpose: To assess the effects of a structured rhythmic exercise program using metronome cues on freezing episodes, gait parameters, balance, fall risk, and quality of life in PD patients. Methods: This randomized controlled trial is planned at Taksim Training and Research Hospital from May 2025 to May 2026. Ethical approval has been granted by Istanbul Medipol University's Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (No. E-10840098-202.3.02-221). Sample size was determined via G\*Power analysis: two groups (n=13 each), total n=26. Participants will be randomized using Random.org into the Rhythmic Exercise Group (REG) or the Exercise Group (EG). Both groups will receive a supervised home-based exercise program, overseen via telerehabilitation. Exercises will be performed 3 times per week for 45-60 minutes each session, over 4 weeks (12 sessions total). Progression to the next week's program will require an 80% success rate; otherwise, the same week's program will be repeated. Online supervision will monitor weekly performance. REG: The structured exercise program will be conducted with metronome cues tailored to each participant's cadence using the "Google Metronome" app. EG: Participants will perform the same exercises at their own pace, without rhythmic cues. At the first visit, the demographic information form containing the demographic information and clinical features of all volunteers will be recorded with the necessary information. Then; The participants' disease severity and disability levels will be assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS); Walking parameters such as walking speed, step length, step count, cadence and freezing times during walking will be assessed with the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MYT) using Movemate Version 1; Balance skills will be assessed with the MiniBESTest; Performance, with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG); Freezing and falls in ADL will be assessed with the Freezing While Walking Scale (WGS) and; Falls, with the International Falls Efficacy Scale (IFES); Quality of life will be assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PHA-39). The assessment tests will be administered face-to-face at the beginning of the study and at the end of the 4th week, 12-18 hours after taking the medication.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Aug 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
Aug 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 16, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 16, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 6, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Parkinson diseasecueingfreezing of gait

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • 10m Walking Test

    10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) One of the tests recommended by the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section as an outcome measure in individuals with PD, the 10MWT is a widely used test to assess walking speed in individuals with walking limitations. In the test, participants are asked to walk at a speed of their own choosing for the normal walking test and as quickly and safely as possible for the fast walking test. Three trials of each test are completed with short rest breaks between trials if necessary. The time for each test is recorded, the average value is calculated and converted to m/s. There are studies in the literature showing that the 10MYT is reliable and valid in individuals with PD. In our study, 10MYT will be applied with 'Movemate version 1' and the collected data will be analyzed.

    week 1 (beginning of study) - week 4 (end of the study)

  • Spatial parameters of walking with Movemate Version 1.0

    MoveMate Version 1 In this study, the MoveMate Version 1 (\*Interrupt Biomedical and Engineering and Joint Stock Company) device will be used to evaluate the spatial parameters of gait in Parkinson's patients. MoveMate Version 1 is a wearable motion tracking system developed for gait analysis, including an accelerometer and gyroscope sensors with a Bosch - BMI270 model IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) attached to the ankle. The device can analyze the patient's gait patterns by recording the patient's gait in real time and store the data securely via a mobile application via Bluetooth connection. As part of the study, a 10-m walking test will be applied to the participants by a physiotherapist, and during this process, accelerometer and gyroscope data will be collected in 3 axes with the MoveMate device. The raw data obtained will be analyzed using specially developed software, and basic gait parameters such as step count, step frequency, step length and walking speed will be calculated

    week 1 (beginning of the study) - week 2 (end of the study)

  • Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

    A simple, widely used and rapid test for assessing mobility, balance and fall risk. To perform the test, participants must get up from a standard chair, walk comfortably to a location 3 meters away from the ground, turn around and return to the chair, and sit back in the same chair. In our study, all steps of the test will be measured in seconds with a stopwatch. The test will be repeated 3 times and the average of these measurements will be analyzed.

    week 1 (beginning of the study)- week 4 (end of the study)

  • MiniBESTest

    It is one of the clinical tests used in the evaluation of walking and balance. It consists of 4 sub-parameters, namely preparatory movement, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, dynamic walking, and a total of 14 items. It is a test that is evaluated over a total of 28 points, requiring an average of 10-15 minutes. High scores indicate high function.

    week 1 (beginning of the study)- week 4 (end of the study)

  • The Freezing of Walking Scale (FWS)

    The Freezing of Walking Scale (FWS) was used to determine and evaluate the subjective perception of Parkinson's patients regarding the severity and effect of the degree of freezing on walking performance. This questionnaire consists of 6 questions, 4 of which evaluate the severity of freezing and 2 of which evaluate walking difficulties in general. It is a 5-point scale from 0 to 4, with a total score between 0 and 24. A higher score means that the person's walking performance is more affected by freezing. The validity and reliability study of the FWS in Turkish has been conducted

    week 1 (beginning of the study- week 4 (end of the study)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The International Falls Efficacy Scale (IAES)

    week 1 (beginning of the study)- week 4 (end of the study)

  • Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PHA-39)

    week 1 (beginning of the study)- week 4 (end of the study)

  • Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale

    week 1-week 4

Study Arms (2)

REG

EXPERIMENTAL

Rhythmic Exercise Group: The structured exercise program will be conducted with metronome cues tailored to each participant's cadence using the "Google Metronome" app. Both groups will receive a supervised home-based exercise program, overseen via telerehabilitation. Exercises will be performed 3 times per week for 45-60 minutes each session, over 4 weeks (12 sessions total). Progression to the next week's program will require an 80% success rate; otherwise, the same week's program will be repeated. Online supervision will monitor weekly performance.

Other: Exercise

EG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Exercise Group: Participants will perform the same exercises at their own pace, without rhythmic cues.

Other: Exercise

Interventions

Sample size was determined via G\*Power analysis: two groups (n=13 each), total n=26. Participants will be randomized using Random.org into the Rhythmic Exercise Group (REG) or the Exercise Group (EG). Both groups will receive a supervised home-based exercise program, overseen via telerehabilitation. Exercises will be performed 3 times per week for 45-60 minutes each session, over 4 weeks (12 sessions total). Progression to the next week's program will require an 80% success rate; otherwise, the same week's program will be repeated. Online supervision will monitor weekly performance.

Also known as: metronome exercises
EGREG

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Hoehn and Yahr Scale Stage III-IV
  • Mini Mental Test Score \> 24
  • Stable medication use for the last month
  • Age range 55-75
  • Able to walk 20 meters independently on level ground
  • Answering Yes to the first question of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
  • Having a caregiver with you during the exercises

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological and Orthopedic Disorders Other Than PD
  • Medically diagnosed hearing loss
  • Patients requiring assistive devices for ambulation
  • Dementia
  • No internet access via smartphone or computer
  • Patients with deep brain pacemakers
  • Having vascular lower extremity pathologies
  • Not receiving any additional physical therapy during the study period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi

Istanbul, İ̇stanbul, 34815, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Ulus Y, Durmus D, Akyol Y, Terzi Y, Bilgici A, Kuru O. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) in community-dwelling older persons. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 May-Jun;54(3):429-33. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.06.010. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

  • Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing. 2005 Nov;34(6):614-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi196.

  • Acaröz Candan, S., Çatıker, A., & Özcan, TŞ. Psychometric Properties Of The Turkish Version Of The Freezing Of Gait Questionnaire For Patients With Parkinson's Disease. Neurol Sci Neurophysiol, 2019; 36(1), 44-50.

    RESULT
  • Potter K, Brandfass K. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). J Physiother. 2015 Oct;61(4):225. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 1. No abstract available.

  • Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Utility of the Mini-BESTest, BESTest, and BESTest sections for balance assessments in individuals with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;35(2):90-7. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e31821a620c.

  • Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Tai CH, Lin CH, Lu WS. Minimal detectable change of the timed "up & go" test and the dynamic gait index in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;91(1):114-21. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090126. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

  • Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Remote Delivery of Allied Health Therapies in Parkinson's Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(s1):S219-S226. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230214.

  • Murgia M, Pili R, Corona F, Sors F, Agostini TA, Bernardis P, Casula C, Cossu G, Guicciardi M, Pau M. The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2018 May 24;9:348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00348. eCollection 2018.

  • Avanzino L, Pelosin E, Vicario CM, Lagravinese G, Abbruzzese G, Martino D. Time Processing and Motor Control in Movement Disorders. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 12;10:631. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00631. eCollection 2016.

  • Ginis P, Nackaerts E, Nieuwboer A, Heremans E. Cueing for people with Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: A narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Nov;61(6):407-413. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

  • Maidan I, Mirelman A, Hausdorff JM, Stern Y, Habeck CG. Distinct cortical thickness patterns link disparate cerebral cortex regions to select mobility domains. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85058-z.

  • Fasano A, Herman T, Tessitore A, Strafella AP, Bohnen NI. Neuroimaging of Freezing of Gait. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(2):241-54. doi: 10.3233/JPD-150536.

  • Spildooren J, Vercruysse S, Heremans E, Galna B, Verheyden G, Vervoort G, Nieuwboer A. Influence of Cueing and an Attentional Strategy on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Disease During Turning. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017 Apr;41(2):129-135. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000178.

  • Martin T, Weatherall M, Anderson TJ, MacAskill MR. A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of a Specific Cueing Program for Falls Management in Persons With Parkinson Disease and Freezing of Gait. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Jul;39(3):179-84. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000093.

  • Zhao Y, Nonnekes J, Storcken EJ, Janssen S, van Wegen EE, Bloem BR, Dorresteijn LD, van Vugt JP, Heida T, van Wezel RJ. Feasibility of external rhythmic cueing with the Google Glass for improving gait in people with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2016 Jun;263(6):1156-65. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8115-2. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

  • Suputtitada A, Chen CPC, Pongmala C, Sriyudthsak M, Wilhelm A, Somboon P, Janssen J, Richards J. The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson's Disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2022 May 18;2022:7360414. doi: 10.1155/2022/7360414. eCollection 2022.

  • McDonnell P, Rodger M, Teixeira LA, Mitchell G, Doumas M. Sensory reweighting for balance in people living with Parkinson's Disease: Postural adaptation, muscle co-contraction, and perceptual delays. Gait Posture. 2025 Mar;117:342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

  • Hvingelby VS, Glud AN, Sorensen JCH, Tai Y, Andersen ASM, Johnsen E, Moro E, Pavese N. Interventions to improve gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2022 Aug;269(8):4068-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11091-1. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

  • Tang L, Zhang L, Liu Y, Li Y, Yang L, Zou M, Yang H, Zhu L, Du R, Shen Y, Li H, Yang Y, Li Z. Optimal dose and type of exercise to improve depressive symptoms in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05118-7.

  • Yang Y, Wang G, Zhang S, Wang H, Zhou W, Ren F, Liang H, Wu D, Ji X, Hashimoto M, Wei J. Efficacy and evaluation of therapeutic exercises on adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 21;22(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03510-9.

  • Song R, Grabowska W, Park M, Osypiuk K, Vergara-Diaz GP, Bonato P, Hausdorff JM, Fox M, Sudarsky LR, Macklin E, Wayne PM. The impact of Tai Chi and Qigong mind-body exercises on motor and non-motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Aug;41:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 25.

  • Bryant MS, Rintala DH, Hou JG, Collins RL, Protas EJ. Gait variability in Parkinson's disease: levodopa and walking direction. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Jul;134(1):83-6. doi: 10.1111/ane.12505. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

  • Osborne JA, Botkin R, Colon-Semenza C, DeAngelis TR, Gallardo OG, Kosakowski H, Martello J, Pradhan S, Rafferty M, Readinger JL, Whitt AL, Ellis TD. Physical Therapist Management of Parkinson Disease: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Physical Therapy Association. Phys Ther. 2022 Apr 1;102(4):pzab302. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab302.

  • Radder DLM, Ligia Silva de Lima A, Domingos J, Keus SHJ, van Nimwegen M, Bloem BR, de Vries NM. Physiotherapy in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Present Treatment Modalities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020 Oct;34(10):871-880. doi: 10.1177/1545968320952799. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

  • Yoon SY. Update on Parkinson's Disease Rehabilitation. Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 Jul 26;15(2):e15. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e15. eCollection 2022 Jul.

  • Simon DK, Tanner CM, Brundin P. Parkinson Disease Epidemiology, Pathology, Genetics, and Pathophysiology. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Feb;36(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Interventions

Exercise

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Motor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
physiotherapist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2025

First Posted

July 16, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

July 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations