NCT06609031

Brief Summary

A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) less than 10mm in size.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
270

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Oct 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress80%
Oct 2024Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 23, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 25, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Sessile Serrated Lesioncold snare polypectomyendoscopic mucosal resection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • R0 resection

    Rate of R0 resection in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size

    2 weeks after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • en bloc resection

    immediately after the procedure

  • Vertical margins

    2 weeks after the procedure

  • Lateral margin

    2 weeks after the procedure

  • Presence of muscularis mucosae

    2 weeks after the procedure

  • Presence of submucosa

    2 weeks after the procedure

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

EMR in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size

EXPERIMENTAL

The EMR procedure included the following: (1) needle injection of normal saline into the submucosa; (2) entrapment of the mucosal protrusion with a snare; and (3) resection using electrocautery

Procedure: endoscopic mucosal resection

CSP in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The CSP procedure included the following: (1) entrapment and resection of the polyp with a snare without electrocautery.

Procedure: Cold snare polypectomy

Interventions

The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by EMR

EMR in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size

The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by CSP

CSP in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged between 35 and 75 years
  • Suspected sessile serrated lesions less than 10mm in size in screening, surveillance or therapeutic colonoscopy
  • Is or 0-IIa according to Paris classification
  • Type 1 according to NICE and JNET classification
  • Type II according to pit pattern
  • Patients must sign an informed consent form prior to registration in study

You may not qualify if:

  • Unsuitable for removal by EMR or CSP
  • Suspected dysplasia or malignancy
  • Recurrent sessile serrated lesions after endoscopic resection
  • Familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome or serrated polyposis syndrome
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents before the examination
  • Severe illness or other high-risk conditions that prevent the patient from cooperating with or tolerating endoscopic therapy
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent form or any other factors that are not suitable for enrollment or affect the ability to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan university

Shanghai, 200040, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalEndoscopy, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Danian Ji, M.D.

    Huadong Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Danian Ji, M.D.

CONTACT

Zhiyu Dong, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2024

First Posted

September 23, 2024

Study Start

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
1 year after completion of this study
Access Criteria
All researchers can require the original data from principal investigator of this study (Email address: arctg4@163.com)

Locations