EMR Versus CSP in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of Sessile Serrated Lesions Less Than 10mm in Size: a Single-center, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled study to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) less than 10mm in size.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2026
September 25, 2024
September 1, 2024
2 years
September 19, 2024
September 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
R0 resection
Rate of R0 resection in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size
2 weeks after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (8)
en bloc resection
immediately after the procedure
Vertical margins
2 weeks after the procedure
Lateral margin
2 weeks after the procedure
Presence of muscularis mucosae
2 weeks after the procedure
Presence of submucosa
2 weeks after the procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMR in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size
EXPERIMENTALThe EMR procedure included the following: (1) needle injection of normal saline into the submucosa; (2) entrapment of the mucosal protrusion with a snare; and (3) resection using electrocautery
CSP in treating SSLs less than 10mm in size
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe CSP procedure included the following: (1) entrapment and resection of the polyp with a snare without electrocautery.
Interventions
The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by EMR
The SSLs less than 10mm in size in this group will be treated by CSP
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 35 and 75 years
- Suspected sessile serrated lesions less than 10mm in size in screening, surveillance or therapeutic colonoscopy
- Is or 0-IIa according to Paris classification
- Type 1 according to NICE and JNET classification
- Type II according to pit pattern
- Patients must sign an informed consent form prior to registration in study
You may not qualify if:
- Unsuitable for removal by EMR or CSP
- Suspected dysplasia or malignancy
- Recurrent sessile serrated lesions after endoscopic resection
- Familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome or serrated polyposis syndrome
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- Patients taking anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents before the examination
- Severe illness or other high-risk conditions that prevent the patient from cooperating with or tolerating endoscopic therapy
- Refusal to sign the informed consent form or any other factors that are not suitable for enrollment or affect the ability to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Fudan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan university
Shanghai, 200040, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Danian Ji, M.D.
Huadong Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2024
First Posted
September 23, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- 1 year after completion of this study
- Access Criteria
- All researchers can require the original data from principal investigator of this study (Email address: arctg4@163.com)
All collected IPD