Exploring Physiotherapist's Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Clinical Decision-making Regarding Physical Activity in Chronic Pain Management.
PPS
Physio Perspective Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
330
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic pain is a globally increasing problem, with enormous impact on the individual and society. Within the treatment of chronic pain, physical activity is a key strategy to improve pain-related complaints. There is ample evidence that physical activity has numerous benefits and few drawbacks. However, the literature shows that those who experience chronic pain experience difficulty performing and sustaining physical activity, and several barriers emerge that hinder physical activity. Patients indicate a need for the supportive role of the health care provider when it comes to guidance toward physically active lifestyle. On the other hand, caregivers find it difficult to fill this role. This can cause frustration for both parties, with a negative impact on the delivery of care. Within the treatment of chronic pain, the physiotherapist is an important healthcare provider. However, it is currently not clear how physiotherapists fulfill their role in the treatment of a patient with chronic pain. It is also not known what the current knowledge is among physiotherapists on chronic pain management, what the perceptions and beliefs around physical activity in the treatment of chronic pain are, and what the clinical decisions are that they make in the treatment of chronic pain in terms of physical activity. To obtain the best and broadest possible answers to these research questions, this study will examine these themes among physiotherapists with respect to two patient groups; namely, patients who experience persistent pain after completing their cancer treatment and individuals with chronic low back pain. Demographic data such as age, employment, occupational specializations, etc. is gathered. Furthermore, knowledge of chronic pain, underlying thoughts and perceptions around chronic pain and physical activity, and clinical decisions of a physiotherapist in treating a patient with chronic pain, including decisions about physical activity will be examined. In addition, this study also investigates whether an elearning around chronic pain and physical activity, has an effect on these knowledge and treatment actions. Participants will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires at 2 time points via an online platform. A first measurement moment happens at the start of the study, after this the participant gets access to the elearning, the second measurement moment happens 30 days after the first measurement moment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedMarch 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.2 years
September 4, 2024
March 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
KNAP
The Dutch Knowledge and Attitude on Pain (KNAP) questionnaire will be administered. It is a 30-item questionnaire which measures the knowledge on chronic pain and pain neurophysiology, biomedical or biopsychosocial beliefs on chronic pain and explicit beliefs on pain management strategies, including physical activity. Questions are statements that are scored on a 6 point Likert-scale, that ranges between: totally not agree (1) and totally agree (6). The total score ranges from 30-180, where a higher overall score indicates better knowledge on pain neurophysiology and a more modern pain-management approach. The KNAP has good measurement properties to evaluate HCPs' knowledge on and attitudes towards modern pain neuroscience.
At baseline and at 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Clinical Case Questionnaire
At baseline and at 30 days
IAT
At baseline.
Study Arms (1)
e-learning
EXPERIMENTALThe aim of the educational module intervention is to enhance the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behavior of HCPs about physical activity as a part of the management of chronic pain. The content of is based on most recent scientific knowledge and guidelines about the management of chronic pain and physical activity and on behavioral change. Four themes are presented: chronic pain, physical activity and chronic pain, specific populations and behavior change. Each subpart can be studied separately. Having separated chapters will be easier for participants to navigate the content, to follow along and to be able to integrate the knowledge in their daily practice. The module will be available online through Teachable™ and will contain a mixture of video and additional written material. Completing the complete module will take approximately 2 hours.
Interventions
The content of this e-learning is based on most recent scientific knowledge and guidelines about the management of chronic pain and physical activity and on behavioral change. Four themes are presented: chronic pain, physical activity and chronic pain, specific populations and behavior change.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be able to read and write Dutch.
- To have access to a computer with an internet connection.
- Currently working as a physiotherapist in Belgium or the Netherlands.
- Experience with the population at hand.
You may not qualify if:
- currently not working as a physiotherapist.
- Other health care professionals.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Antwerp
Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mira Meeus, Doctoral degree
Universiteit Antwerpen
- STUDY CHAIR
Nathalie Roussel, Doctoral degree
Universiteit Antwerpen
- STUDY CHAIR
An De Groef, Doctoral degree
Universiteit Antwerpen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. dr. Mira Meeus
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2024
First Posted
September 20, 2024
Study Start
December 15, 2022
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03