NCT06605729

Brief Summary

Chronic pain is a globally increasing problem, with enormous impact on the individual and society. Within the treatment of chronic pain, physical activity is a key strategy to improve pain-related complaints. There is ample evidence that physical activity has numerous benefits and few drawbacks. However, the literature shows that those who experience chronic pain experience difficulty performing and sustaining physical activity, and several barriers emerge that hinder physical activity. Patients indicate a need for the supportive role of the health care provider when it comes to guidance toward physically active lifestyle. On the other hand, caregivers find it difficult to fill this role. This can cause frustration for both parties, with a negative impact on the delivery of care. Within the treatment of chronic pain, the physiotherapist is an important healthcare provider. However, it is currently not clear how physiotherapists fulfill their role in the treatment of a patient with chronic pain. It is also not known what the current knowledge is among physiotherapists on chronic pain management, what the perceptions and beliefs around physical activity in the treatment of chronic pain are, and what the clinical decisions are that they make in the treatment of chronic pain in terms of physical activity. To obtain the best and broadest possible answers to these research questions, this study will examine these themes among physiotherapists with respect to two patient groups; namely, patients who experience persistent pain after completing their cancer treatment and individuals with chronic low back pain. Demographic data such as age, employment, occupational specializations, etc. is gathered. Furthermore, knowledge of chronic pain, underlying thoughts and perceptions around chronic pain and physical activity, and clinical decisions of a physiotherapist in treating a patient with chronic pain, including decisions about physical activity will be examined. In addition, this study also investigates whether an elearning around chronic pain and physical activity, has an effect on these knowledge and treatment actions. Participants will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires at 2 time points via an online platform. A first measurement moment happens at the start of the study, after this the participant gets access to the elearning, the second measurement moment happens 30 days after the first measurement moment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
330

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 15, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 4, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

September 4, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Physiotherapy and rehabilitationClinical Decision MakingAttitudes and beliefsPhysical ActivityChronic PainCancer SurvivorshipKnowledgeChronic Low Back Painelearning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • KNAP

    The Dutch Knowledge and Attitude on Pain (KNAP) questionnaire will be administered. It is a 30-item questionnaire which measures the knowledge on chronic pain and pain neurophysiology, biomedical or biopsychosocial beliefs on chronic pain and explicit beliefs on pain management strategies, including physical activity. Questions are statements that are scored on a 6 point Likert-scale, that ranges between: totally not agree (1) and totally agree (6). The total score ranges from 30-180, where a higher overall score indicates better knowledge on pain neurophysiology and a more modern pain-management approach. The KNAP has good measurement properties to evaluate HCPs' knowledge on and attitudes towards modern pain neuroscience.

    At baseline and at 30 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Case Questionnaire

    At baseline and at 30 days

  • IAT

    At baseline.

Study Arms (1)

e-learning

EXPERIMENTAL

The aim of the educational module intervention is to enhance the knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behavior of HCPs about physical activity as a part of the management of chronic pain. The content of is based on most recent scientific knowledge and guidelines about the management of chronic pain and physical activity and on behavioral change. Four themes are presented: chronic pain, physical activity and chronic pain, specific populations and behavior change. Each subpart can be studied separately. Having separated chapters will be easier for participants to navigate the content, to follow along and to be able to integrate the knowledge in their daily practice. The module will be available online through Teachable™ and will contain a mixture of video and additional written material. Completing the complete module will take approximately 2 hours.

Other: e-learning

Interventions

The content of this e-learning is based on most recent scientific knowledge and guidelines about the management of chronic pain and physical activity and on behavioral change. Four themes are presented: chronic pain, physical activity and chronic pain, specific populations and behavior change.

e-learning

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • To be able to read and write Dutch.
  • To have access to a computer with an internet connection.
  • Currently working as a physiotherapist in Belgium or the Netherlands.
  • Experience with the population at hand.

You may not qualify if:

  • currently not working as a physiotherapist.
  • Other health care professionals.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Antwerp

Wilrijk, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

BehaviorMotor ActivityChronic Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mira Meeus, Doctoral degree

    Universiteit Antwerpen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nathalie Roussel, Doctoral degree

    Universiteit Antwerpen

    STUDY CHAIR
  • An De Groef, Doctoral degree

    Universiteit Antwerpen

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. dr. Mira Meeus

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2024

First Posted

September 20, 2024

Study Start

December 15, 2022

Primary Completion

February 28, 2026

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

March 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations