Neurofeedback for the Management of Neuropathic Pain in People with Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
We will conduct a high-quality, blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to rigorously test the effectiveness of EEG-based NF in patients with diabetes-related neuropathic pain in: 1) reducing pain intensity and pain affect, and 2) improving daily functioning and QoL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 19, 2024
May 1, 2024
1.3 years
August 29, 2024
September 16, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity and affect
Change in self-reported pain intensity and pain affect (an average over a daily measurement in a 7-day pain diary using a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10)
Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Neuropathic pain severity
Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)
Neuropathic pain severity
Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)
Neuropathic pain severity
Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)
Disability
Before and after intervention (approx. 8 weeks). Between groups after intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year after baseline)
Sleep quality
7 day diary before baseline and after intervention (approx. 8 weeks)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Real EEG-neurofeedback
EXPERIMENTALthe NF intervention group will receive feedback based on the genuine real-time EEG activity
Sham EEG-neurofeedback
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham-group will receive another participant's EEG-training protocol as a prerecorded signal. The feedback signal will consist of 15-25 rewards per minute. Meanwhile, the threshold for the sham group remains fixed, ensuring a consistent 70% positive feedback rate.
Interventions
Traditional neurofeedback uses one or two electrodes to modulate activity within a specific frequency band. Standardized Weighted Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (swLORETA) analyzes the 3D distribution of intracortical brain electrical activity based on surface EEG recordings, enabling real-time brainwave imaging with a spatial resolution under one cubic centimeter. This divides the brain into over 12,000 voxels, offering localization similar to fMRI while maintaining EEG's faster temporal resolution. Source-localized NF can target specific, deeper brain regions, multiple Brodmann areas simultaneously, and provide feedback on connectivity between neural sources, enabling the training of specific neural networks. swLORETA metrics are compared to a normative database of neurotypical brains to produce z-scores for each area and metric. We will use the NeuroGuide normative database, FDA-approved and validated in peer-reviewed studies, widely used in clinical NF.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 and ≤82 years
- Diagnosed with 1) type 1 diabetes (for at least 5 years) or 2) type 2 diabetes
- The Toronto consensus criteria will be used for a case definition of DPN where patients have to have at least probable DPN (31). Diagnosis of DPN is confirmed with abnormal DPN Check. Painful DPN will be defined using the grading system for neuropathic pain (50) and will be in line with IASP's definition of neuropathic pain, i.e., "pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory system" (The Toronto consensus criteria).
- TCNS score \> 5
- Eligible patients with painful DPN must have a pain intensity of at least 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) for at least 3 months on at least semi-daily basis and no severe pain other than pain due to neuropathy (the pain intensity will be based on the pain the patients experience while on current pain treatment, if any).
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant neurological (neurodegenerative disorders, migraine, epilepsy, stroke, tumor) or clinically significant psychiatric illness
- Neuropathy or neuropathic pain due to other causes than diabetes (vitamin B12 deficiency, prior treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy, chronic alcohol abuse, spinal stenosis, etc.)
- Change in current pain treatment during treatment (paracetamol is allowed as rescue medicine)
- Prior or current excessive alcohol use (\>14 or \>21 units/week for women and men, respectively) or illegal substance abuse
- Positive urine hCG test result indicating pregnancy
- Morphine use \>20mg/day
- Blindness or severely impaired vision
- The investigator finds the patient unfit for the study (e.g. due to use of alcohol or drugs, mental incapacity, unwillingness, or language barrier precluding adequate understanding or cooperation or presence of any condition that in the investigators' opinion may lead to poor adherence to study protocol).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Southern Denmarklead
- European Foundation for the Study of Diabetescollaborator
- Region of Southern Denmarkcollaborator
- Vissing fondencollaborator
- Steno Diabetes Center Odensecollaborator
- Aarhus University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Southern Denmark
Odense, 5230, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share