NCT06603792

Brief Summary

We will conduct a high-quality, blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to rigorously test the effectiveness of EEG-based NF in patients with diabetes-related neuropathic pain in: 1) reducing pain intensity and pain affect, and 2) improving daily functioning and QoL.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1

Timeline
1mo left

Started Sep 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress96%
Sep 2024Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 16, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Neurofeedbackdiabetic neuropathypainful diabetic neuropathyRCTEEG-neurofeedback

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain intensity and affect

    Change in self-reported pain intensity and pain affect (an average over a daily measurement in a 7-day pain diary using a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0-10)

    Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Neuropathic pain severity

    Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)

  • Neuropathic pain severity

    Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)

  • Neuropathic pain severity

    Before and after the intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year from start until four months follow up)

  • Disability

    Before and after intervention (approx. 8 weeks). Between groups after intervention (approx. 8 weeks) and at 4 months follow-up (approx. a half year after baseline)

  • Sleep quality

    7 day diary before baseline and after intervention (approx. 8 weeks)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Real EEG-neurofeedback

EXPERIMENTAL

the NF intervention group will receive feedback based on the genuine real-time EEG activity

Behavioral: EEG-neurofeedback

Sham EEG-neurofeedback

SHAM COMPARATOR

The sham-group will receive another participant's EEG-training protocol as a prerecorded signal. The feedback signal will consist of 15-25 rewards per minute. Meanwhile, the threshold for the sham group remains fixed, ensuring a consistent 70% positive feedback rate.

Behavioral: EEG-neurofeedback

Interventions

Traditional neurofeedback uses one or two electrodes to modulate activity within a specific frequency band. Standardized Weighted Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (swLORETA) analyzes the 3D distribution of intracortical brain electrical activity based on surface EEG recordings, enabling real-time brainwave imaging with a spatial resolution under one cubic centimeter. This divides the brain into over 12,000 voxels, offering localization similar to fMRI while maintaining EEG's faster temporal resolution. Source-localized NF can target specific, deeper brain regions, multiple Brodmann areas simultaneously, and provide feedback on connectivity between neural sources, enabling the training of specific neural networks. swLORETA metrics are compared to a normative database of neurotypical brains to produce z-scores for each area and metric. We will use the NeuroGuide normative database, FDA-approved and validated in peer-reviewed studies, widely used in clinical NF.

Real EEG-neurofeedbackSham EEG-neurofeedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 82 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 and ≤82 years
  • Diagnosed with 1) type 1 diabetes (for at least 5 years) or 2) type 2 diabetes
  • The Toronto consensus criteria will be used for a case definition of DPN where patients have to have at least probable DPN (31). Diagnosis of DPN is confirmed with abnormal DPN Check. Painful DPN will be defined using the grading system for neuropathic pain (50) and will be in line with IASP's definition of neuropathic pain, i.e., "pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory system" (The Toronto consensus criteria).
  • TCNS score \> 5
  • Eligible patients with painful DPN must have a pain intensity of at least 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) for at least 3 months on at least semi-daily basis and no severe pain other than pain due to neuropathy (the pain intensity will be based on the pain the patients experience while on current pain treatment, if any).

You may not qualify if:

  • Concomitant neurological (neurodegenerative disorders, migraine, epilepsy, stroke, tumor) or clinically significant psychiatric illness
  • Neuropathy or neuropathic pain due to other causes than diabetes (vitamin B12 deficiency, prior treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy, chronic alcohol abuse, spinal stenosis, etc.)
  • Change in current pain treatment during treatment (paracetamol is allowed as rescue medicine)
  • Prior or current excessive alcohol use (\>14 or \>21 units/week for women and men, respectively) or illegal substance abuse
  • Positive urine hCG test result indicating pregnancy
  • Morphine use \>20mg/day
  • Blindness or severely impaired vision
  • The investigator finds the patient unfit for the study (e.g. due to use of alcohol or drugs, mental incapacity, unwillingness, or language barrier precluding adequate understanding or cooperation or presence of any condition that in the investigators' opinion may lead to poor adherence to study protocol).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Southern Denmark

Odense, 5230, Denmark

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Neuropathies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Francois Pouwer, Professor

CONTACT

Johanne Axelsen, PhD-student

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The project will investigate two randomized groups: a 'true' EEG-NF-group and 'sham' EEG-NF-group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations