Evaluation of Clinical Results of Patients Treated Conservatively for Distal Biceps Tendon Lesions
CoB
Is Conservative Treatment Still an Option for Distal Biceps Tendon Lesions? Evaluation of Clinical Results of Patients Treated Conservatively for Distal Biceps Tendon Lesions at 1 Year Minimum Follow-up
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A clinical evaluation of the results of conservative treatment after distal biceps tendon rupture with a minimum follow up of 1 year. The results will be evaluated with clinical scores (MEPS, DASH and SF-12) and strenght and fatigue evaluations with dynamometers for both flexion and supination of elbow and forearm. The results of the affected side will be compared with the controlateral side
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedMarch 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
8 months
September 16, 2024
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Elbow Function
The Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS) or Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) is an instrument used to test the limitations, caused by pathology, of the elbow during activities of daily living (ADL) . This specific test uses 4 subscales: Pain, Range of Motion (arc of motion of the art. humeroulnaris) Stability Daily Function MEPS can be used to measure which treatment work best for different conditions, An example would be when deciding the best post-operative treatment for example: the difference in prognosis between open and closed fractures when operated. This numerical scale express results on a scale from 0 to 100 and considers results with a score higher than 85 as excellent results.
At baseline (day 0)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Upper Limb Function
At baseline (day 0)
Short Form Health Survey
At baseline (day 0)
Flexion strenght
At baseline (day 0)
Flexion Fatigue
At baseline (day 0)
Supination Strenght
At baseline (day 0)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Conservative treatment
Patients treated conservatively for distal biceps tendon rupture
Interventions
Conservative treatment instead of surgical repair
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients who have suffered an acute distal biceps tendon rupture
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years old at time of injury
- Complete acute distal biceps tendon rupture diagnosed and evaluated at IRCCS Istituto ortopedico Rizzoli between 2000 and 2024 treated conservatively
You may not qualify if:
- \< 18 years at time of injury
- Patients who present controindications to the strenght evaluation
- Patients who have developed other non correlated injuries to the affected arm (e.g. fractures or tendon injuries)
- Patients treated surgically for distal biceps tendon rupture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, BO, 40136, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Srinivasan RC, Pederson WC, Morrey BF. Distal Biceps Tendon Repair and Reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Jan;45(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.09.014.
PMID: 31901332BACKGROUNDAthwal GS, Steinmann SP, Rispoli DM. The distal biceps tendon: footprint and relevant clinical anatomy. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Oct;32(8):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.027.
PMID: 17923307BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 16, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
October 31, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03