Could Conservative Treatment Become the New Gold Standard in Achilles Tendon Ruptures?
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare conservative and surgical treatments for acute Achilles tendon rupture. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to either a conservative rehabilitation protocol or open surgical repair. Functional outcomes were evaluated using isokinetic muscle strength testing and clinical scoring systems such as the ATRS, AOFAS, FADI, VAS, and Leppilahti scores. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of strength, tendon length, or clinical outcomes. Rerupture rates were similar, while wound complications occurred only in the surgical group. The findings suggest that conservative treatment combined with early functional rehabilitation can provide outcomes comparable to surgery, with fewer complications. Conservative treatment may be a safe and effective alternative for managing acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2025
CompletedDecember 31, 2025
December 1, 2025
6 months
December 1, 2025
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Peak Plantar Flexion Torque
Peak plantar flexion torque (Newton-meters, Nm) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity.
12-18 months post-injury
Total Work During Plantar Flexion
Total work during plantar flexion (Joules) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity.
12-18 months post-injury
Initial Plantar Flexion Torque
Initial plantar flexion torque (Newton-meters, Nm) measured using an isokinetic dynamometer (HUMAC NORM 2015) at a standardized angular velocity
12-18 months post-injury
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Achilles Tendon Resting Angle (ATRA)
12-18 months post-injury
Pain Intensity (VAS)
12-18 months post-injury
Leppilahti Achilles tendon rupture score
12-18 months post-injury
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score
12-18 months post-injury
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
12-18 months post-injury
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conservative Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants follow the GAPNOT functional rehabilitation protocol, including initial immobilization in plantar flexion, gradual partial to full weight-bearing, and supervised physiotherapy to improve plantar flexion strength and ankle range of motion.
Surgical Repair
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpen end-to-end Achilles tendon repair using the locked Krackow suture technique, followed by epitendinous augmentation and standardized early functional rehabilitation including gradual weight-bearing and physiotherapy.
Interventions
Participants follow the GAPNOT functional rehabilitation protocol. Initially immobilized in maximum plantar flexion with non-weight-bearing. At 2 weeks partial weight-bearing is allowed with an Achilles boot and heel lifts; by weeks 4-6 weight-bearing is increased and supervised physiotherapy is initiated focusing on plantar flexion strength, calf strengthening and ankle range of motion. Outcomes assessed at 12-18 months by isokinetic testing and clinical scores.
Participants undergo open end-to-end Achilles tendon repair using the locked Krackow suture technique with 2-0 FiberWire and epitendinous augmentation. Postoperatively, standardized early functional rehabilitation is applied including gradual weight-bearing, ankle mobilization and physiotherapy focused on plantar flexion strength and ROM. Outcomes assessed at 12-18 months by isokinetic testing and clinical scores.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-50 years
- Acute complete Achilles tendon rupture (tendon-to-tendon)
- Injury occurred within 3 weeks prior to presentation
- Willingness and ability to comply with the functional rehabilitation program
You may not qualify if:
- Injury occurred more than 3 weeks prior to presentation
- Open Achilles tendon rupture
- History of preexisting foot or ankle pathology
- Musculotendinous, insertional, or calcaneal avulsion-type Achilles tendon injuries
- Presence of additional risk factors increasing Achilles tendon injury risk (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive therapy, fluoroquinolone use, or systemic corticosteroid use)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, 34265, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No parties were masked in this trial. Both participants and investigators were aware of the assigned treatment group throughout the study. Outcome assessments were performed openly, without blinding.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 31, 2025
Study Start
August 20, 2023
Primary Completion
February 20, 2024
Study Completion
December 20, 2024
Last Updated
December 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The decision is based on patient confidentiality, ethical considerations, and the study's informed consent process, which did not include provisions for data sharing with external researchers