Comparison Between Epidural Analgesia and Intrathecal Opioid Analgesia for Pain Management in Open Nephrectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nephrectomy is a surgical procedure of choice for patients suffering from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Even though the laparoscopic approach is considered to cause fewer complications and reduce hospital stay, open surgery is still often performed. Open nephrectomy causes significant acute postoperative pain, and it can also lead to the development of chronic postoperative pain. Pain management is important for the overall recovery of patients undergoing major surgery such as open nephrectomy and it is a part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. In this prospective randomized clinical study, we plan to compare two different approaches to pain management regarding the level of acute pain (first 72 hours), side effects, systemic analgesics consumption, and hospital stay. Our hypothesis are that intrathecal opioid administration significantly reduces acute postoperative pain compared to epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open radical or partial nephrectomy. We also hypothesize that the intrathecal opioid administration is associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects compared to epidural analgesia and shorter ICU length of stay.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 pain
Started Jan 2025
Typical duration for phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 10, 2025
March 1, 2025
9 months
August 27, 2024
March 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
NRS score at 24 hours postoperatively
The primary outcome is the difference in NRS score at 24 hours postoperatively at rest and movement. Numeric rating scale (NRS) will be used, ranging from 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means most severe pain.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Intraoperative opioid consumption
Intraoperatively.
Numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 1, 3, 6, 48 and 72 hours postoperatively
72 hours.
Time to first rescue analgesia postoperatively
In the first 72 hours postoperatively.
Total amount of rescue analgesia during 24 and 72 hours postoperatively
72 hours.
Incidence of adverse effects
72 hours.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Epidural analgesia
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn epidural catheter will be placed before induction to the anesthesia. A local anesthetic Levobupivacaine 0.25% (Levobupivakain Kabi ®, Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Svinesundsveien, Norway, 5 mg/ml) will be administered as a bolus dose during the surgery and continuously (0.125% levobupivacaine) during the first 24 hours postoperatively. After the intervention, patients will undergo general anesthesia.
Intrathecal opioid analgesia
OTHERPatients in the Intervention group will receive a single dose of 300 mcg of morphine (Morphine Kalceks ®, Kalceks, AS, Riga, Latvija, 10mg/ml) intrathecally before induction to general anesthesia.
Interventions
After establishing standard non-invasive monitoring of vital functions (electrocardiogram, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation) and securing intravenous access, the patient will be seated. After sterile field preparation, a local anesthetic (2% lidocaine) will be administered at the site of the planned puncture. The epidural space will be identified at the level of the tenth thoracic intervertebral space using the loss of resistance technique and an 18G Tuohy epidural needle. After placing the epidural catheter, 4 ml of local anesthetic Levobupivacaine 0.25% will be administered into the epidural space. After inducing general anesthesia, an additional 4 ml of Levobupivacaine 0.25% will be administered before the surgical incision. Subjects in the control group will receive an infusion of 0.125% Levobupivacaine for 24 hours after the procedure.
After establishing standard non-invasive monitoring of vital functions (electrocardiogram, blood pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation) and securing intravenous access, the patient will be seated. After sterile field preparation, a local anesthetic (2% lidocaine) will be administered at the site of the planned intrathecal puncture. Subsequently, at the selected site, the dura will be punctured using a spinal needle (25G Quincke spinal needle), and 0.3 mg of morphine will be administered to the patient. Following the intervention, the patient will be induced into general anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients over the age of 18, scheduled for an open radical or partial nephrectomy due to RCC.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to participate in this study.
- Patients with BMI \> 35 kg/m2 or \< 15 kg/m2.
- Patients with renal dysfunction (eGFR \<15 or requirement of renal replacement therapy), liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C), and heart failure (NYHA IV).
- Patients with ASA physical status classification ≥ IV.
- Patients with contraindication for the interventions planned for in this study (allergies to anesthetic drugs used in this study, coagulation disorders, and infection at the injection site).
- Patients with chronic opioid dependence.
- Patients unable to communicate preoperatively due to severe dementia, language barrier, or neuropsychiatric disorder.
- Patients for whom it is impossible to carry out the aforementioned interventions for technical reasons.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Univeristy Hospital of Split
Split, 21000, Croatia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Svjetlana Došenović, MD Phd
UH Split
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be performed using a computer program. A research coordinator will be designated to distribute and preserve randomization results. A person designated for data analysis will be blinded for intervention performed in each group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2025
Primary Completion
October 15, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03