The Effects of Vitamin B6 Supplementation on Pain Thresholds and Tolerance
Testing the Effects of High-dose Vitamin B6 Supplements on Pain Thresholds and Tolerance in Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aims to explore the effect of Vitamin B6 supplementation on pain thresholds and tolerance in healthy adults using thermal and electrical stimulation. Researchers will compare a placebo group to high-dose Vitamin-B6 to see if vitamin B6 increases pain thresholds and tolerance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 pain
Started May 2024
Typical duration for phase_1 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 11, 2026
March 1, 2026
9 months
May 10, 2024
March 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Thermal sensory threshold
Sensory threshold will be measured using thermal stimulation (heat stimulation). The starting temperature of the applied probe will be adjusted to the individual's skin temperature and then slowly increased (0.5 deg C/s) until the participant feels a slight warm sensation. For safety, the temperature will never exceed 50 deg C. The procedure will be repeated three times. The average change in temperature (in degree Celsius) needed for participants to perceive a warm sensation will be used as outcome measure. Low values will therefore indicate a high sensitivity to warmth, whereas high values will indicate a low warmth sensitivity.
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Thermal pain threshold
Pain threshold will be measured using thermal stimulation (heat stimulation). The starting temperature of the applied probe will be adjusted to the individual's skin temperature and then slowly increased (1 deg C/s) until the participant feels a slight pain/burning sensation. For safety, the temperature will never exceed 50 deg C. The procedure will be repeated three times. The average change in temperature (in degree Celsius) needed for participants to perceive a slight pain/burning sensation will be used as outcome measure. Low values will therefore indicate high pain sensitivity, whereas high values will indicate low pain sensitivity.
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Electrical pain sensitivity
Pain sensitivity will be measured using electrical stimulation. Starting at an initial intensity of 0.3 mA, the intensity of each subsequently applied electrical stimulus will be increased in steps of 0.3 mA each, with a maximum intensity of 10 mA. The procedure will be continued until the participant perceives the applied shock as moderately painful (equivalent to a pain rating of 5 out of 10 or higher). The procedure will be repeated three times. The average intensity (in mA) needed for participants to perceive a moderate pain sensation will be used as outcome measure. Low values will therefore indicate a high sensitivity to electrical stimulation, whereas high values will indicate a low pain sensitivity in response to electrical stimulation.
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Thermal pain tolerance
Pain tolerance will be measured using thermal stimulation (heat stimulation). The starting temperature of the applied probe will be adjusted to the individual's skin temperature and then slowly increased (1 deg C/s) until the participant feels that they can't tolerate the heat anymore. For safety, the temperature will never exceed 50 deg C. The procedure will be repeated three times. The average change in temperature (in degree Celsius) needed for participants to reach their pain tolerance will be used as outcome measure. Low values will therefore indicate low pain tolerance, whereas high values will indicate high pain tolerance.
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Cold immersion pain tolerance
Pain tolerance will be measured by recording the number of seconds the participant is willing to keep their hand immersed in a 5 degree celsius cold bath, up to a maximum of 120 sec.
This will be done at baseline, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Pain wind-up
Pain sensitisation will be measured using a wind-up paradigm (temporal summation) with thermal stimulation (heat simulation). The thermal probe will start at 32 deg C and increase in temperature (100 deg C/s) to 49 deg C. After a duration of 800 ms, the temperature will return to baseline. Participants will be asked for a pain rating on a scale form 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful). Subsequently, a series of 10 heat stimuli (identical to the once above, ISI 400 ms) will be applied. Participants will be asked to rate the most intense pain that they felt across the series, using the same 0-10 rating scale. The difference in pain ratings in response to the series and to the single stimulus will be used as the outcome measure. Higher (positive) ratings will indicate a stronger sensitisation to repeated painful stimuli. In contrast, negative values will indicate habituation to repeated painful stimuli.
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (4)
State anxiety
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Positive and negative affect
This will be done at baseline, 4-5 hours, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Sleep quality
This will be done at baseline, 3-5 days, 11-13, and 28-35 days after the start of the intervention
Dietary intake
This will be measured at baseline during their first visit only
Study Arms (2)
Vitamin-B6
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will consume one high-dose Vitamin B6 100 mg tablet orally once daily for one month. Vitamin B6 will be provided as Pyridoxal-5'-Phosphate (PLP).
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will consume a Placebo tablet matching the appearance of the Vitamin B6 tablets in the Experimental arm orally once daily for one month.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over the age of 18 years
- Fluent speaker of English language
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years
- Presence or history of chronic pain
- Presence of neuropathic/nerve pain
- Raynaud's syndrome
- Using any vitamin supplementations that contain Vitamin B6 at more than the RDA, or combinations of B vitamins.
- On any medication that is GABA agonistic
- Any use of analgesic/anti-inflammatory medication up to 48 hours prior to any of the testing sessions.
- Any heart conditions
- Newly acquired tattoos on the pain stimulation site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- INNOPUREcollaborator
- University of Readinglead
Study Sites (1)
University of Reading
Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Spielberger, C. D., Gonzalez-Reigosa, F., Martinez-Urrutia, A., Natalicio, L. F., & Natalicio, D. S. (1971). The state-trait anxiety inventory. Revista Interamericana de Psicologia/Interamerican journal of psychology, 5(3 & 4).
BACKGROUNDWatson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDMartinez-Gonzalez MA, Garcia-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvado J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D, Covas MI, Schroder H, Aros F, Gomez-Gracia E, Fiol M, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Lapetra J, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Serra-Majem L, Pinto X, Munoz MA, Warnberg J, Ros E, Estruch R; PREDIMED Study Investigators. A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043134. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PMID: 22905215BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2024
First Posted
May 16, 2024
Study Start
May 30, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share