Carvedilol Plus EVL or Not for the Primary Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Carvedilol Non-responders
CVL-NR
Carvedilol Plus Endoscopic Ligation or Not for the Primary Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Carvedilol Non-responders: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether carvedilol plus endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is more effective for the primary prevention of esophageal variceal bleeding than carvedilol alone in carvedilol non-responders. It will also learn about the safety of carvedilol combined with EVL in patients with cirrhosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: Whether carvedilol plus EVL is more effective than carvedilol alone in preventing the first esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients unresponsive to carvedilol. What medical problems do participants have when taking carvedilol or taking carvedilol combined with undergoing EVL? Researchers will compare the efficacy and safety of carvedilol with or without EVL in preventing the first esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients unresponsive to carvedilol. Participants will: Take carvedilol every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable) and undergo EVL every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication followed by regular endoscopic follow-up according to the protocol, or Take carvedilol alone every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable). Visit the clinic once every 2-3 months for checkups and tests. Keep a diary of their vital signs (SBP, DBP, and HR) as well as symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2025
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2030
February 11, 2025
February 1, 2025
5.7 years
September 10, 2024
February 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Esophageal variceal bleeding
The cumulative incidence of esophageal variceal bleeding
3 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Other upper gastrointestinal bleeding
3 years
First/further nonbleeding liver decompensation
3 years
Overall survival
3 years
Adverse events
3 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Primary and secondary outcomes categorized by Child-Pugh class in the subgroup analysis
3 years
Study Arms (2)
Carvedilol plus endoscopic variceal ligation
ACTIVE COMPARATORTake carvedilol every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable) and undergo EVL every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication followed by regular endoscopic follow-up according to the protocol.
Carvedilol alone
PLACEBO COMPARATORTake carvedilol alone every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable).
Interventions
Take carvedilol every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable) and undergo EVL every 3-4 weeks until variceal eradication followed by regular endoscopic follow-up according to the protocol.
Take carvedilol alone every day (start from 6.25 mg/d and then titrate to 12.5 mg/d if tolerable).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices who, after carvedilol treatment, continue to experience variceal enlargement or develop new red color signs.
You may not qualify if:
- Age under 18 or over 90 years.
- History of esophageal variceal bleeding.
- Previous treatment for esophageal varices, including endoscopic variceal ligation, endoscopic sclerotherapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, or surgery.
- Contraindications to non-selective beta-blockers, including severe atrioventricular block, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, or severe peripheral artery disease.
- Presence of end-stage organ diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma or other terminal cancers, heart failure, or renal failure.
- Pregnant women.
- Refusal to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 11217, Taiwan
Related Publications (26)
Chung CS, Chang PF, Liao CH, Lee TH, Chen Y, Lee YC, Wu MS, Wang HP, Ni YH. Differences of microbiota in small bowel and faeces between irritable bowel syndrome patients and healthy subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(4):410-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1116107. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
PMID: 26595305BACKGROUNDFernandez M, Semela D, Bruix J, Colle I, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Angiogenesis in liver disease. J Hepatol. 2009 Mar;50(3):604-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.011. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
PMID: 19157625BACKGROUNDFernandez M, Vizzutti F, Garcia-Pagan JC, Rodes J, Bosch J. Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice. Gastroenterology. 2004 Mar;126(3):886-94. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.12.012.
PMID: 14988842BACKGROUNDSchubert K, Olde Damink SWM, von Bergen M, Schaap FG. Interactions between bile salts, gut microbiota, and hepatic innate immunity. Immunol Rev. 2017 Sep;279(1):23-35. doi: 10.1111/imr.12579.
PMID: 28856736BACKGROUNDWahlstrom A, Sayin SI, Marschall HU, Backhed F. Intestinal Crosstalk between Bile Acids and Microbiota and Its Impact on Host Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016 Jul 12;24(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
PMID: 27320064BACKGROUNDRidlon JM, Alves JM, Hylemon PB, Bajaj JS. Cirrhosis, bile acids and gut microbiota: unraveling a complex relationship. Gut Microbes. 2013 Sep-Oct;4(5):382-7. doi: 10.4161/gmic.25723. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
PMID: 23851335BACKGROUNDWiest R, Lawson M, Geuking M. Pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Aug 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 23993913BACKGROUNDBaffy G. Potential mechanisms linking gut microbiota and portal hypertension. Liver Int. 2019 Apr;39(4):598-609. doi: 10.1111/liv.13986. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
PMID: 30312513BACKGROUNDArab JP, Martin-Mateos RM, Shah VH. Gut-liver axis, cirrhosis and portal hypertension: the chicken and the egg. Hepatol Int. 2018 Feb;12(Suppl 1):24-33. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9798-x. Epub 2017 May 26.
PMID: 28550391BACKGROUNDPande A, Kumar Sarin S, Jindal A, et al. Efficacy of carvedilol, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) or a combination for the prevention of first variceal bleed in child B and C cirrhosis with high risk varices: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 2019;v70:96A
BACKGROUNDGiuffre M, Dupont J, Visintin A, Masutti F, Monica F, You K, Shung DL, Croce LS; NSBB-Elasto-Response-Prediction Group. Predicting response to non-selective beta-blockers with liver-spleen stiffness and heart rate in patients with liver cirrhosis and high-risk varices. Hepatol Int. 2025 Apr;19(2):460-471. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10649-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
PMID: 38664292BACKGROUNDBhardwaj A, Kedarisetty CK, Vashishtha C, Bhadoria AS, Jindal A, Kumar G, Choudhary A, Shasthry SM, Maiwall R, Kumar M, Bhatia V, Sarin SK. Carvedilol delays the progression of small oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1838-1843. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311735. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
PMID: 27298379BACKGROUNDWani ZA, Mohapatra S, Khan AA, Mohapatra A, Yatoo GN. Addition of simvastatin to carvedilol non responders: A new pharmacological therapy for treatment of portal hypertension. World J Hepatol. 2017 Feb 18;9(5):270-277. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i5.270.
PMID: 28261384BACKGROUNDMerkel C, Bolognesi M, Sacerdoti D, Bombonato G, Bellini B, Bighin R, Gatta A. The hemodynamic response to medical treatment of portal hypertension as a predictor of clinical effectiveness in the primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2000 Nov;32(5):930-4. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.19322.
PMID: 11050041BACKGROUNDJachs M, Hartl L, Simbrunner B, Bauer D, Paternostro R, Balcar L, Hofer B, Pfisterer N, Schwarz M, Scheiner B, Stattermayer AF, Pinter M, Trauner M, Mandorfer M, Reiberger T. Carvedilol Achieves Higher Hemodynamic Response and Lower Rebleeding Rates Than Propranolol in Secondary Prophylaxis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2318-2326.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
PMID: 35842118BACKGROUNDReiberger T, Ulbrich G, Ferlitsch A, Payer BA, Schwabl P, Pinter M, Heinisch BB, Trauner M, Kramer L, Peck-Radosavljevic M; Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab. Carvedilol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with haemodynamic non-response to propranolol. Gut. 2013 Nov;62(11):1634-41. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304038. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
PMID: 23250049BACKGROUNDKaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, Fortune BE, Simonetto DA, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2024 May 1;79(5):1180-1211. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000647. Epub 2023 Oct 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 37870298BACKGROUNDBanares R, Moitinho E, Matilla A, Garcia-Pagan JC, Lampreave JL, Piera C, Abraldes JG, De Diego A, Albillos A, Bosch J. Randomized comparison of long-term carvedilol and propranolol administration in the treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002 Dec;36(6):1367-73. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36947.
PMID: 12447861BACKGROUNDde Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C; Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):959-974. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
PMID: 35120736BACKGROUNDSharma M, Singh S, Desai V, Shah VH, Kamath PS, Murad MH, Simonetto DA. Comparison of Therapies for Primary Prevention of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2019 Apr;69(4):1657-1675. doi: 10.1002/hep.30220. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
PMID: 30125369BACKGROUNDVillanueva C, Albillos A, Genesca J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, Banares R, Morillas RM, Poca M, Penas B, Augustin S, Abraldes JG, Alvarado E, Torres F, Bosch J. beta blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1597-1608. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31875-0. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
PMID: 30910320BACKGROUNDGluud LL, Krag A. Banding ligation versus beta-blockers for primary prevention in oesophageal varices in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD004544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004544.pub2.
PMID: 22895942BACKGROUNDSarin SK, Lamba GS, Kumar M, Misra A, Murthy NS. Comparison of endoscopic ligation and propranolol for the primary prevention of variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 1999 Apr 1;340(13):988-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199904013401302.
PMID: 10099140BACKGROUNDGarcia-Tsao G, Lim JK; Members of Veterans Affairs Hepatitis C Resource Center Program. Management and treatment of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: recommendations from the Department of Veterans Affairs Hepatitis C Resource Center Program and the National Hepatitis C Program. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1802-29. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.191. Epub 2009 May 19.
PMID: 19455106BACKGROUNDEl-Serag HB, Everhart JE. Improved survival after variceal hemorrhage over an 11-year period in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec;95(12):3566-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03376.x.
PMID: 11151893BACKGROUNDSanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(6):1715-28. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.007. No abstract available.
PMID: 18471549BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
January 6, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2030
Last Updated
February 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share