Improving Participation After Stroke Self-Management-Rehabilitation
IPASS-R
Efficacy of the Improving Participation After Stroke Self-Management-Rehabilitation (IPASS-R) Program in Sub-acute Stroke
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall goal of this proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy of a small-group, stroke-specific, self-management program delivered via telehealth to improve self-efficacy, activity performance, and quality of life in individuals with sub-acute stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Dec 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2029
April 28, 2026
April 1, 2026
5 years
September 6, 2024
April 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Performance
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean better performance.
Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 6), and 6-month follow-up (week 32)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Satisfaction
Self-report measure of activity performance. Minimum = 1, Maximum = 10. Higher scores mean higher satisfaction.
Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 6), and 6-month follow-up (week 32)
Participation Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale (PS-SES)
Self-report measure of self-efficacy in using participation strategies. The subject rates confidence across 35 items within six subscales: (1) managing home participation, (2) staying organized, (3) planning and managing community participation, (4) managing work and productivity), (5) managing communication, and (6) advocating for resources. Range of scores from 35-350. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 6), and 6-month follow-up (week 32)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
In home activity level as measured by sensor system
Duration of study (from baseline assessment (week 0) to 6-month follow-up assessment)
Community engagement as measured by sensor system
Duration of study (from baseline assessment (week 0) to 6-month follow-up assessment)
Stroke Impact Scale participation domain
Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 6), and 6-month follow-up (week 32)
Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H)
Pre-intervention (week 0), post-intervention (week 6), and 6-month follow-up (week 32)
Study Arms (2)
Improving Participation after Stroke Self-Management Program (IPASS)
EXPERIMENTALThe IPASS-R intervention consists of 6 weekly 90-minute sessions delivered by an occupational therapist and stroke survivor peer facilitator. All sessions will be delivered remotely via videoconferencing.
Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe CDSMP will consist of 6, weekly 90-minute sessions. All sessions will be delivered remotely via videoconferencing.
Interventions
The IPASS-R program is a group-based self-management intervention that aims to improve problem-solving, action-planning, and resource utilization skills for improved community living and participation. The Activity-Barriers-Changes-Doing-Evaluation (ABCDE) framework is a user friendly problem-solving and goal setting framework that is used repetitively in each session throughout the program. Participants are guided to identify (1) an activity that they want to improve or re-engage in (A); (2) individual and environmental barriers that hinder their engagement (B); (3) changes that they can make to deal with the barriers and improve their engagement (C); and (4) an action plan to pursue (D). After the action plan, participants come back in the next session and evaluate their performance in following through on their plans (E).
The program is facilitated by two trained leaders in small groups in a community setting with individuals who have chronic health problems and will follow the CDSMP protocol. Participants receive education on various health-related topics applicable to a range of chronic conditions, share experiences, and support one another.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- less than 6 months post-stroke
- age 45-85 years
- completed inpatient rehabilitation services (if recommended)
- living in the community with or without caregiver support (i.e., not living in a skilled nursing facility)
- ability to read, write, and speak English
- diagnosis of mild or moderate stroke (National Institutes of Health stroke score \<16)
- able to use videoconferencing independently or with caregiver support
You may not qualify if:
- severe depressive symptoms as indicated by a score ≥21 on the Patient Health Questionnaire
- dementia symptoms as indicated by a score of \<23 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
- additional neurological diagnoses (e.g., brain malignancy, previous severe stroke)
- (4) moderate or severe aphasia as indicated by a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale aphasia score of ≥ 2
- inability to provide informed consent
- any other condition not otherwise specified that the PI determines would render participation in this study as unsafe for the participant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States
Related Publications (7)
Jette DU, Latham NK, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, Slavin MD, Horn SD. Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):238-48.
PMID: 15733048BACKGROUNDSakakibara BM, Kim AJ, Eng JJ. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Self-Management for Improving Risk Factor Control in Stroke Patients. Int J Behav Med. 2017 Feb;24(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s12529-016-9582-7.
PMID: 27469998BACKGROUNDFryer CE, Luker JA, McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD010442. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010442.pub2.
PMID: 27545611BACKGROUNDChen L, Chen Y, Chen X, Shen X, Wang Q, Sun C. Longitudinal Study of Effectiveness of a Patient-Centered Self-Management Empowerment Intervention During Predischarge Planning on Stroke Survivors. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Jun;15(3):197-205. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12295.
PMID: 29878691BACKGROUNDCadilhac DA, Hoffmann S, Kilkenny M, Lindley R, Lalor E, Osborne RH, Batterbsy M. A phase II multicentered, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of the stroke self-management program. Stroke. 2011 Jun;42(6):1673-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601997. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
PMID: 21493910BACKGROUNDWolf TJ, Baum CM, Lee D, Hammel J. The Development of the Improving Participation after Stroke Self-Management Program (IPASS): An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Aug;23(4):284-92. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1155278. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
PMID: 27077987BACKGROUNDLee D, Fischer H, Zera S, Robertson R, Hammel J. Examining a participation-focused stroke self-management intervention in a day rehabilitation setting: a quasi-experimental pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017 Dec;24(8):601-607. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1375222. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
PMID: 28956721BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna E Boone, PhD, OTR/L
University of Missouri Occupational Therapy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All outcomes assessors will be blinded to participant study group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Occupational Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
December 16, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2029
Last Updated
April 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04