NCT06586125

Brief Summary

This study explores the potential of Virtual Reality (VR) technology to enhance powered wheelchair (PW) training for children diagnosed with Cerebral Palsy (CP) and neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). The primary objective is to improve mobility and independence by employing immersive VR games and simulations within a powered mobility program (PMP) framework. The research involve testing a VR-powered mobility program (VR-PMP) simulator, which integrates 3D gaming tailored with PMP tasks accessible via laptops or VR headsets. Specifically designed for children with severe movement limitations, the study incorporates Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs), enabling interaction within the VR environment without conventional controllers. The study aims to evaluate whether these innovative VR tools can facilitate safer and independent wheelchair navigation for these children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 4, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 28, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 28, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cerebral palsyNeuromuscular diseasesPowered mobilityVirtual realityPediatric rehabilitationBrain-computer interface

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of dropout participants unable to use the VR-PMP simulator

    This outcome assesses the capability of using the VR-PMP (Virtual Reality-Powered Mobility Program) simulator by observing dropout rates, from 0 participant to 10 participants due to technology issues (e.g., equipment usability, motion sickness), as well as satisfaction levels with VR (Virtual Reality) hardware and software.

    from Tprel (day 1) to T13 (day 41)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • PMP (Powered Mobility Program) score

    T0 (day 2), T1 (day 3), T6 (day 25), T12 (day 40), T13 (day 41)

  • QUEST-2 (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology) questionnaire score

    T0 (day 2), T13 (day41)

  • MSAQ (Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire) score

    T1 (day 3), T6 (day 25), T12 (day 40)

  • IPQ (iGroupPresence Questionnaire) score

    T1 (day 3), T6 (day 25), T12 (day 40)

  • NASA-TLX (NASA Task Load Index) score

    T0 (day 2), T1 (day 3), T6 (day 25), T12 (day 40), T13 (day 41)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

VR - based training

Five children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and/or neuromuscular disease and five children and adolescents with cerebral palsy and/or neuromuscular disease with difficulties to control the VR joysticks

Other: Powered Mobility Training

Interventions

The study procedure aims to observe the partecipants' behaviour while using the Virtual Reality - Power Mobility Program (VR-PMP) simulator applied during Power Mobility Training in clinical practice for 15 sessions. Participants use either semi-immersive mode (laptop screen with VR-PMP simulator) or immersive mode (head-mounted display with VR-PMP simulator). Five out of ten children unable to use conventional VR controllers or alternative access technologies available on the market, use brain-computer interface (BCI) developed specifically for these children to control the VR-PMP simulator.

Also known as: Virtual Reality - based powered mobility training
VR - based training

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study will enroll up to ten pediatric participants diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) or neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) who require powered wheelchair for their mobility.

You may qualify if:

  • Both sexes
  • Age between 6 and 20 years
  • Clinical diagnosis: Central motor disability with Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) levels 3-4-5
  • Owner of a powered wheelchair or a manual wheelchair with an electric propulsion system
  • Powered Mobility Program (PMP) score \> 0 in basic skills
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who do not tolerate the use of immersive VR (e.g., development of motion sickness-related symptoms)
  • Severe cognitive impairments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

Bologna, Bologna, 40139, Italy

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Graham HK, Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Dan B, Lin JP, Damiano DL, Becher JG, Gaebler-Spira D, Colver A, Reddihough DS, Crompton KE, Lieber RL. Cerebral palsy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Jan 7;2:15082. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.82.

    PMID: 27188686BACKGROUND
  • Mercuri E, Muntoni F. Muscular dystrophies. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):845-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61897-2.

    PMID: 23465426BACKGROUND
  • Jones MA, McEwen IR, Neas BR. Effects of power wheelchairs on the development and function of young children with severe motor impairments. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012 Summer;24(2):131-40; discussion 140. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e31824c5fdc.

    PMID: 22466379BACKGROUND
  • Rosen L, Plummer T, Sabet A, Lange ML, Livingstone R. RESNA position on the application of power mobility devices for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2023 Jan 2;35(1):14-22. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1415575. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

    PMID: 29232181BACKGROUND
  • Bottos M, Bolcati C, Sciuto L, Ruggeri C, Feliciangeli A. Powered wheelchairs and independence in young children with tetraplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Nov;43(11):769-77. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001402.

    PMID: 11730152BACKGROUND
  • Bray N, Kolehmainen N, McAnuff J, Tanner L, Tuersley L, Beyer F, Grayston A, Wilson D, Edwards RT, Noyes J, Craig D. Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(50):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta24500.

    PMID: 33078704BACKGROUND
  • Livingstone R, Field D. Systematic review of power mobility outcomes for infants, children and adolescents with mobility limitations. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Oct;28(10):954-64. doi: 10.1177/0269215514531262. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

    PMID: 24764156BACKGROUND
  • Kirby RL, Dupuis DJ, Macphee AH, Coolen AL, Smith C, Best KL, Newton AM, Mountain AD, Macleod DA, Bonaparte JP. The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.007.

    PMID: 15129405BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Weiss PL, Rigbi A, Rosenberg L. Lessons learned from a pediatric powered mobility lending program. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Aug;19(6):2250-2259. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2276232. Epub 2023 Oct 28.

    PMID: 37897432BACKGROUND
  • Field DA, Livingstone RW. Power mobility skill progression for children and adolescents: a systematic review of measures and their clinical application. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Oct;60(10):997-1011. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13709. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

    PMID: 29542110BACKGROUND
  • Fraudet B, Leblong E, Piette P, Nicolas B, Gouranton V, Babel M, Devigne L, Pasteau F, Gallien P. Evaluation of power wheelchair driving performance in simulator compared to driving in real-life situations: the SIMADAPT (simulator ADAPT) project-a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 23;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01354-5.

    PMID: 38654367BACKGROUND
  • Faure C, Routhier F, Lettre J, Choukou MA, Archambault PS. Effectiveness of the miWe Simulator Training on Powered Wheelchair-driving Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep;104(9):1371-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 19.

    PMID: 37209934BACKGROUND
  • Furumasu J, Guerette P, Tefft D. Relevance of the Pediatric Powered Wheelchair Screening Test for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004 Jul;46(7):468-74. doi: 10.1017/s0012162204000775.

    PMID: 15230460BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Archambault PS, Rigbi A, Weiss PL. Pediatric powered mobility training: powered wheelchair versus simulator-based practice. Assist Technol. 2023 Sep 3;35(5):389-398. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2022.2084183. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

    PMID: 35737961BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Rigbi A, Weiss PLT. Reliability and validity of pediatric powered mobility outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):882-887. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1819449. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

    PMID: 32924663BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Rigbi A, Archambault PS, Weiss PL. Comparing children's driving abilities in physical and virtual environments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Aug;16(6):653-660. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1693644. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

    PMID: 31805790BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Rigbi A, Weiss PL. Predictive model of proficiency in powered mobility of children and young adults with motor impairments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Dec;61(12):1416-1422. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14264. Epub 2019 May 21.

    PMID: 31115048BACKGROUND
  • Gefen N, Rosenberg L. Development of a new tool: progression of paediatric powered mobility- 3PM. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Feb;19(2):465-473. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2099020. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

    PMID: 35833624BACKGROUND
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96-105. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132015.

    PMID: 11508406BACKGROUND
  • Gianaros PJ, Muth ER, Mordkoff JT, Levine ME, Stern RM. A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2001 Feb;72(2):115-9.

    PMID: 11211039BACKGROUND
  • Salimi Z, Ferguson-Pell MW. Motion sickness and sense of presence in a virtual reality environment developed for manual wheelchair users, with three different approaches. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0255898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255898. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34411151BACKGROUND
  • Laurie-Rose C, Frey M, Ennis A, Zamary A. Measuring perceived mental workload in children. Am J Psychol. 2014 Spring;127(1):107-25. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.1.0107.

    PMID: 24720100BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyNeuromuscular Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Antonella Cersosimo, Dr.

    IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

September 4, 2023

Primary Completion

December 20, 2024

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

August 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations