NCT06585423

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the tolerability and comfort of 4 different prototype anesthesia-free tonometer tips with the standard tonometer tip in conjunction with anesthesia. The best-tolerated prototype anesthesia-free tonometer tip will be identified for further development for home tonometry.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 17, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 25, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient tolerability rating of different tips

    Tolerability of the different prototype anesthesia-free tonometer tips with the standard tonometer tip - based on a 0-5 scale the participants reports with higher score meaning more comfortable.

    Baseline

  • Patient comfort rating of different tips

    Comfort of the different prototype anesthesia-free tonometer tips with the standard tonometer tip - based on a 0-5 scale the participants reports with higher score meaning more comfortable.

    Baseline

Study Arms (5)

Medical grade acrylic tip covered by a sterile commercially available bandage contact lens

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Sterile commercially available bandage contact lens

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness < 100 µm

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Medical grade silicone of a thickness <100 µm

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness > 100 µm

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Medical grade silicone of a thickness >100 µm

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness < 100 µm with blue tint

EXPERIMENTAL
Diagnostic Test: Medical grade silicone of a thickness <100 µm with blur tint

Standard tip in conjunction with a topical anesthetic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Diagnostic Test: Standard tip in conjunction with a topical anesthetic

Interventions

Medical grade acrylic tip covered by a sterile commercially available bandage contact lens

Medical grade acrylic tip covered by a sterile commercially available bandage contact lens

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness \>100 µm

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness > 100 µm

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness \<100 µm with blur tint

Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness < 100 µm with blue tint

Standard tip in conjunction with a topical anesthetic

Standard tip in conjunction with a topical anesthetic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presenting for a routine eye exam
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Able and willing to give consent

You may not qualify if:

  • History of corneal scarring
  • Active infection of the eye
  • History of alternated corneal sensitivity
  • History of corneal surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke Eye Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Joanne Wen, MD

    Duke Eye Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intraocular pressure measurements using 4 different prototype tips. All standard equipment used to perform Goldmann Applanation Tonometry will be used with the only difference being the applanator tip. The 4 prototypes are as follows and are tested in random order: 1. \- Medical grade acrylic tip covered by a sterile commercially available bandage contact lens (Air Optix, Night and Day Contacts, Alcon). The bandage contact lens will be changed between subjects and the underlying acrylic tip sterilized per standard clinical procedure (bleach soak followed by soak and rinse in sterile water). 2. \- Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness \< 100 µm. T 3. \- Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness \> 100 µm. 4. \- Medical grade acrylic tip coated with medical grade silicone of a thickness \< 100 µm with blur tint. All tips will be sterilized between subjects 5. \- Standard tip in conjunction with a topical anesthetic
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2024

First Posted

September 5, 2024

Study Start

October 17, 2024

Primary Completion

February 25, 2026

Study Completion

February 25, 2026

Last Updated

June 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations