Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus Deformities
A Prospective Study of the Minimally Invasive Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus Deformities Randomized With Arthroscopy or No Arthroscopy at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Lapidus procedure corrects bunions, a condition called hallux first ray deformity. Using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to perform this procedure on patients with hallux valgus deformity is a newer approach. Because it's newer, there is not studies on how patients feel about it directly through patient reported outcomes (PROMs), which involve patients filling out questionnaires. Previous studies have looked at information that could be gathered from radiographs. This study looks specifically at how well bones heal after the MIS procedure and how patients feel about it based on their recorded responses in PROMs. The Lapidus procedure involves a step where the surgeon checks for the amount of cartilage removal, which can be done by inserting a mini camera into the joint (arthroscopically) or through a small incision for visual inspection. These two methods of checking cartilage removal are the two treatment groups for this study that patients are randomly assigned to. The main goals of the study are as follows:
- To determine healing in minimally invasive Lapidus. Evaluated by bones fusing together at 12 weeks post-operation.
- To determine patient reported outcomes following Lapidus procedures
- To determine the relationship between patient-reported outcomes and percent bone healing.
- To assess the nonunion (bone not fusing together) rate and re-operation rate following Lapidus procedures
- To assess the correction achieved on radiographic and standing CT measurements.
- To compare radiographic and Standing CT assessment of hallux valgus deformity and correction after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
August 26, 2024
August 1, 2024
2 years
May 14, 2024
August 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary: Bone Fusion
Rate of bone fusion by comparing the mean percentage of the joint fused at Week 12 using LineUp scans
At 12 weeks post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Secondary: Questionnaires-Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System (MODEMS)
Pre-operative, and at all post-operative followups (2 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 52 Weeks)
Secondary: Questionnaires-Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Pre-operative, and at all post-operative followups (2 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 52 Weeks)
Secondary: Questionnaires-Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pre-operative, and at all post-operative followups (2 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 12 Weeks, 52 Weeks)
Secondary: Re-operation and complication rates
At any point during enrolment up to 52 weeks post-operation.
Study Arms (2)
Arthroscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsing arthroscopy in minimally invasive lapidus procedure is the current standard of care. However a new screw is used (PROstep MIS 5mm Chamfer Screw). The new hardware is expected to be substantially equivalent to standard of care.
No Arthroscopy
EXPERIMENTALNon-Arthroscopic Mini Arthrotomy Procedure (research-specific): Surgical procedure between the two treatment groups are equivalent except at the step of checking cartilage removal. After use of the cartilage burr the surgeon will make a small dorsal portal and use this to ensure that the cartilage is removed and all debris removed. The incision will be 2 cm long and centered over the dorsal medial aspect of the joint. The Principal Investigator wants to know if the mini arthrotomy procedure is as effective as the control because this procedure is faster and easier to perform.
Interventions
The two procedures, with and without arthroscopy, only differ by the method of assessing cartilage removal. Cartilage removal will be assessed arthroscopically in the procedure with arthroscopy. In the procedure without arthroscopy, cartilage removal will be assessed via direct visualization through a mini arthrotomy procedure. After use of the cartilage burr the surgeon will make a small dorsal portal and use this opening to ensure that the cartilage is removed and all debris removed. The incision will be 2 cm long and centered over the dorsal medial aspect of the joint.
After removal of the cartilage with the cartilage burr, a 3.0 arthroscope will be inserted to inspect the joint for all cartilage removal. Any residual cartilage pieces will be removed to ensure complete cartilage debridement from the subchondral bone and fragments removed from the joint.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is at least 19 years of age.
- The subject is considered to be skeletally mature.
- The subject is undergoing an isolated 1st TMT, which may or may not include concomitant procedures, such as:
- Soft tissue realignment
- Heel cord lengthening
- Akin osteotomy
- Lesser toe osteotomies or claw toe correction
- The subject is able to comply with all post-operative evaluations and visits.
- The subject is able to provide informed consent.
- The subject consents to and will receive either arthroscopy or no arthroscopy condition using the PROstep MIS 5mm Chamfer Screw.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients indicated for TMT fusion for non-hallux valgus procedures.
- Patients with simultaneous fusion of second and third ray.
- Patients indicated for navicular-cuneiform joint performed at the same time.
- The subject has:
- Arthritis in the affected joint
- Severe osteoporosis
- Neuromuscular impairment
- Prior or current infection in the affected joint
- Charcot foot
- The subject has undergone previous fusion surgery of the proposed site (i.e., revision of failed fusion attempt).
- The subject will be undergoing an ankle replacement, any other concomitant fusion(s), or any lesser metatarsal osteotomies in the affected foot or ankle in the same sitting.
- The subject has concomitant injury, which in the opinion of the Investigator, is likely to impair functions for as long as or longer than the recovery from the subject's 1st TMT fusion.
- The subject is deemed morbidly obese (BMI \> 50 kg/m2
- The subject has a major risk factor for non-union (ex. poorly controlled diabetes, current smoker).
- There is radiographic evidence of bone cysts, segmental defects or growth plate fracture around the fusion site that may negatively impact bony fusion. The patient currently has untreated malignant neoplasm(s), or is currently undergoing radio- or chemotherapy or has been diagnosed with hypercalcemia.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St. Paul's Hospital, Canadalead
- Stryker Nordiccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alastair Younger
University of British Columbia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patients find out their assignment group after their surgery.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2024
First Posted
August 26, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08