Minimally Invasive Distal Chevron in Comparison to the Reverdin-Isham Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Correction
Midterm Results After Minimally Invasive Distal Chevron Osteotomy: Comparison of Our Results to the Minimally Invasive Reverdin-Isham Osteotomy From a Systematic Review of the Literature.
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study analyses the Reverdin Isham procedure, which is the most popular minimally invasive surgical hallux valgus correction method and the minimally invasive chevron osteotomy, representing the standard technique of open surgery. It is hypothesized that the two techniques would show significant differences in regard to radiological outcome (Hypothesis 1), clinical outcome (Hypothesis 2) and development of radiological recurrence (Hypothesis 3).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedMarch 2, 2020
February 1, 2020
9 months
February 19, 2020
February 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
radiological outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature
radiographic (Hallux valgus angle, Intermetatarsal articular angle and distal metatarsal articular angle measured in grades) with the minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy is evaluated. Data is collected from a consecutive Patient cohort treated at the investigator´s Department. A cohort of more than 50 patients will be assessed.
change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
clinical outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature
change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)
clinical outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature
change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)
Study Arms (1)
distal minimally invasive distal chevron
The investigators compare the results of a consecutive cohort of patients treated with the above mentioned technique in comparison to the results of patients treated with the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham technique, presented in literature
Interventions
With an electric motor-driven machine the resection of the medial eminence as well as a V-shaped osteotomy was performed in hallux valgus patients. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to identify the ideal osteotomy site and to control the Intervention. Fixation of the metatarsal head was achieved with a screw or with a K wire. Residual bone ridges were reamed and bone debris washed out.
Eligibility Criteria
A rseries of a cohort of hallux patients treated with the minimally invasive Chevron ostotomy with a Minimum follow-up of 24 months is analyzed retrospectively in regard to the clinical (different clinical scores) and radiological Outcome (radiographic Analysis of defined angles).
You may qualify if:
- patients after minimally invasive distal Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus deformity with a Minimum follow up of 24 months
- patients with informed written consent for being analyzed
- patients, of whom radiographs are available from preoperative throughout the follow-up time of 24 months
You may not qualify if:
- patients under 18 years of age
- pregnant patients, or women below the age of 50 ys, of whom the pregnancy status is not clear
- patients with mental illness or patients, who cannot follow the required postoperative Treatment or controls
- patients, who refuse to participate
- patients, who are assigned to other clinical studies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dr.Gerhard Kaufmannlead
- Medical University Innsbruckcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Gerhard Kaufmann
Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria
Related Publications (8)
Vopat BG, Lareau CR, Johnson J, Reinert SE, DiGiovanni CW. Comparative study of scarf and extended chevron osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Dec;6(6):409-16. doi: 10.1177/1938640013508431. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
PMID: 24154993BACKGROUNDBrogan K, Voller T, Gee C, Borbely T, Palmer S. Third-generation minimally invasive correction of hallux valgus: technique and early outcomes. Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2115-21. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2500-1. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
PMID: 25128969BACKGROUNDJowett CRJ, Bedi HS. Preliminary Results and Learning Curve of the Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Operation for Hallux Valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 May-Jun;56(3):445-452. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
PMID: 28237566BACKGROUNDLee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P. Hallux Valgus Correction Comparing Percutaneous Chevron/Akin (PECA) and Open Scarf/Akin Osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Aug;38(8):838-846. doi: 10.1177/1071100717704941. Epub 2017 May 5.
PMID: 28476096BACKGROUNDRedfern D, Perera AM. Minimally invasive osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Jun;19(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.02.002.
PMID: 24878408BACKGROUNDBrogan K, Lindisfarne E, Akehurst H, Farook U, Shrier W, Palmer S. Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1197-1204. doi: 10.1177/1071100716656440. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
PMID: 27381179BACKGROUNDCrespo Romero E, Penuela Candel R, Gomez Gomez S, Arias Arias A, Arcas Ordono A, Galvez Gonzalez J, Crespo Romero R. Percutaneous forefoot surgery for treatment of hallux valgus deformity: an intermediate prospective study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Aug;101(2):167-172. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0464-1. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
PMID: 28168637BACKGROUNDMaffulli N, Longo UG, Marinozzi A, Denaro V. Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2011;97:149-67. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldq027. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
PMID: 20710024BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Gerhard Kaufmann, Principal investigator and Head of the Orthopaedic and Foot Center Innsbruck
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Posted
February 28, 2020
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
August 31, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2019
Last Updated
March 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share