NCT04288297

Brief Summary

This study analyses the Reverdin Isham procedure, which is the most popular minimally invasive surgical hallux valgus correction method and the minimally invasive chevron osteotomy, representing the standard technique of open surgery. It is hypothesized that the two techniques would show significant differences in regard to radiological outcome (Hypothesis 1), clinical outcome (Hypothesis 2) and development of radiological recurrence (Hypothesis 3).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 19, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • radiological outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature

    radiographic (Hallux valgus angle, Intermetatarsal articular angle and distal metatarsal articular angle measured in grades) with the minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy is evaluated. Data is collected from a consecutive Patient cohort treated at the investigator´s Department. A cohort of more than 50 patients will be assessed.

    change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • clinical outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature

    change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)

  • clinical outcome after minimally invasive Chevron osteotomy in comparison to the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham method presented in literature

    change from preoperative to 24 months postoperative (as it is presented in literature)

Study Arms (1)

distal minimally invasive distal chevron

The investigators compare the results of a consecutive cohort of patients treated with the above mentioned technique in comparison to the results of patients treated with the minimally invasive Reverdin-Isham technique, presented in literature

Procedure: distal minimally invasive chevron osteotomy

Interventions

With an electric motor-driven machine the resection of the medial eminence as well as a V-shaped osteotomy was performed in hallux valgus patients. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was used to identify the ideal osteotomy site and to control the Intervention. Fixation of the metatarsal head was achieved with a screw or with a K wire. Residual bone ridges were reamed and bone debris washed out.

Also known as: austin, v-shaped osteotomy, percutaneous hallux valgus correction
distal minimally invasive distal chevron

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

A rseries of a cohort of hallux patients treated with the minimally invasive Chevron ostotomy with a Minimum follow-up of 24 months is analyzed retrospectively in regard to the clinical (different clinical scores) and radiological Outcome (radiographic Analysis of defined angles).

You may qualify if:

  • patients after minimally invasive distal Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus deformity with a Minimum follow up of 24 months
  • patients with informed written consent for being analyzed
  • patients, of whom radiographs are available from preoperative throughout the follow-up time of 24 months

You may not qualify if:

  • patients under 18 years of age
  • pregnant patients, or women below the age of 50 ys, of whom the pregnancy status is not clear
  • patients with mental illness or patients, who cannot follow the required postoperative Treatment or controls
  • patients, who refuse to participate
  • patients, who are assigned to other clinical studies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gerhard Kaufmann

Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020, Austria

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Vopat BG, Lareau CR, Johnson J, Reinert SE, DiGiovanni CW. Comparative study of scarf and extended chevron osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013 Dec;6(6):409-16. doi: 10.1177/1938640013508431. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

    PMID: 24154993BACKGROUND
  • Brogan K, Voller T, Gee C, Borbely T, Palmer S. Third-generation minimally invasive correction of hallux valgus: technique and early outcomes. Int Orthop. 2014 Oct;38(10):2115-21. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2500-1. Epub 2014 Aug 17.

    PMID: 25128969BACKGROUND
  • Jowett CRJ, Bedi HS. Preliminary Results and Learning Curve of the Minimally Invasive Chevron Akin Operation for Hallux Valgus. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 May-Jun;56(3):445-452. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

    PMID: 28237566BACKGROUND
  • Lee M, Walsh J, Smith MM, Ling J, Wines A, Lam P. Hallux Valgus Correction Comparing Percutaneous Chevron/Akin (PECA) and Open Scarf/Akin Osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Aug;38(8):838-846. doi: 10.1177/1071100717704941. Epub 2017 May 5.

    PMID: 28476096BACKGROUND
  • Redfern D, Perera AM. Minimally invasive osteotomies. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014 Jun;19(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.02.002.

    PMID: 24878408BACKGROUND
  • Brogan K, Lindisfarne E, Akehurst H, Farook U, Shrier W, Palmer S. Minimally Invasive and Open Distal Chevron Osteotomy for Mild to Moderate Hallux Valgus. Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1197-1204. doi: 10.1177/1071100716656440. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

    PMID: 27381179BACKGROUND
  • Crespo Romero E, Penuela Candel R, Gomez Gomez S, Arias Arias A, Arcas Ordono A, Galvez Gonzalez J, Crespo Romero R. Percutaneous forefoot surgery for treatment of hallux valgus deformity: an intermediate prospective study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Aug;101(2):167-172. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0464-1. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

    PMID: 28168637BACKGROUND
  • Maffulli N, Longo UG, Marinozzi A, Denaro V. Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2011;97:149-67. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldq027. Epub 2010 Aug 14.

    PMID: 20710024BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hallux ValgusBunion

Interventions

austin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Foot DeformitiesMusculoskeletal DiseasesFoot Deformities, Acquired

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Gerhard Kaufmann, Principal investigator and Head of the Orthopaedic and Foot Center Innsbruck

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Posted

February 28, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion

August 31, 2019

Study Completion

August 31, 2019

Last Updated

March 2, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations