NCT06565923

Brief Summary

Firstly, we retrospectively gathered the patient information who compliant with the criteria from 2012 to 2023, encompassing basic information, clinical information, along with MRI images, blood/urine samples, and tissue samples, for conducting relevant analyses of radiomics. Subsequently, based on artificial intelligence technology, deep learning and machine learning models were established on the basis of MRI radiomics and pathological histomics. Ultimately, the following research aims were accomplished: 1. Primary research objective: To explore the role of artificial intelligence and multimodal omics features in the staging and prognosis monitoring of bladder cancer. 2. Secondary objective: To explore the correlations among radiomics, case histomics, and test omics.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 18, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 18, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 18, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

August 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Multimodal omics featuresartificial intelligencestaging and prognostic modelsBladder cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the duration from surgery to death or the date of the last follow-up.

    2013-

  • Progression-free survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival (PFS) refers to the time from surgery until disease progression, the date of the last follow-up, or death from causes other than disease recurrence

    2013-

  • Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)

    Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS)

    2013-

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Tumor Infiltration Status

    2013-

  • Lymph node metastasis status

    2013-

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatment Effects

    2013-

Study Arms (1)

Adult bladder cancer patients with MRI, pathology, and laboratory data provided

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

1\. Patients with bladder cancer in preoperative examination; 2. Gender is not limited; 3. Age≥ 18 years old; 4. Be able to provide MRI images, pathological data and laboratory examination data before the operation; 5. Agree to provide basic personal clinical information and pathological and imaging data for scientific research use, and sign the informed consent form; 6. Agree to provide monitoring results during follow-up recurrence monitoring;

You may qualify if:

  • \. Patients with bladder cancer in preoperative examination; 2. Gender is not limited; 3. Age≥ 18 years old; 4. Be able to provide MRI images, pathological data and laboratory examination data before the operation; 5. Agree to provide basic personal clinical information and pathological and imaging data for scientific research use, and sign the informed consent form; 6. Agree to provide monitoring results during follow-up recurrence monitoring;

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Incomplete clinicopathological data; 2. Combined with upper tract urothelial carcinoma or previously diagnosed upper tract urothelial carcinoma; 3. Is participating in the rest of the clinical studies; Unable to cooperate with the relevant examinations of this project, and do not agree to sign the informed consent form.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Ge L, Chen Y, Yan C, Zhao P, Zhang P, A R, Liu J. Study Progress of Radiomics With Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Bladder Cancer Management. Front Oncol. 2019 Nov 28;9:1296. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01296. eCollection 2019.

  • Tataru OS, Vartolomei MD, Rassweiler JJ, Virgil O, Lucarelli G, Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Manfredi M, Carrieri G, Falagario U, Terracciano D, de Cobelli O, Busetto GM, Del Giudice F, Ferro M. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer Patient Management-Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 20;11(2):354. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020354.

  • Ferro M, de Cobelli O, Musi G, Del Giudice F, Carrieri G, Busetto GM, Falagario UG, Sciarra A, Maggi M, Crocetto F, Barone B, Caputo VF, Marchioni M, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Vartolomei MD, Cormio L, Autorino R, Tataru OS. Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review. Ther Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 4;14:17562872221109020. doi: 10.1177/17562872221109020. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

  • Ardila D, Kiraly AP, Bharadwaj S, Choi B, Reicher JJ, Peng L, Tse D, Etemadi M, Ye W, Corrado G, Naidich DP, Shetty S. End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):954-961. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x. Epub 2019 May 20.

  • Liu KL, Wu T, Chen PT, Tsai YM, Roth H, Wu MS, Liao WC, Wang W. Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jun;2(6):e303-e313. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30078-9.

  • Vente C, Vos P, Hosseinzadeh M, Pluim J, Veta M. Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb;68(2):374-383. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.2993528. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

  • Wang K, Lu X, Zhou H, Gao Y, Zheng J, Tong M, Wu C, Liu C, Huang L, Jiang T, Meng F, Lu Y, Ai H, Xie XY, Yin LP, Liang P, Tian J, Zheng R. Deep learning Radiomics of shear wave elastography significantly improved diagnostic performance for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B: a prospective multicentre study. Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):729-741. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316204. Epub 2018 May 5.

  • Nishiyama H, Habuchi T, Watanabe J, Teramukai S, Tada H, Ono Y, Ohshima S, Fujimoto K, Hirao Y, Fukushima M, Ogawa O. Clinical outcome of a large-scale multi-institutional retrospective study for locally advanced bladder cancer: a survey including 1131 patients treated during 1990-2000 in Japan. Eur Urol. 2004 Feb;45(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.011.

  • Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Lorch A, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Veskimae E, Ribal MJ, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

  • Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L, Pycha A, Comploj E, Svatek RS, Lotan Y, Trinh QD, Karakiewicz PI, Holmang S, Scherr DS, Zerbib M, Vickers AJ, Shariat SF. Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 17;109(6):1460-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.372. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

  • Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, Gontero P, Liedberg F, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Seisen T, Soukup V, Sylvester RJ. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022 Jan;81(1):75-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Blood, urine, bladder tissue

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Year
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2024

First Posted

August 22, 2024

Study Start

March 18, 2024

Primary Completion

July 18, 2025

Study Completion

July 18, 2025

Last Updated

August 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations