NCT06563583

Brief Summary

Some previous studies have reported structural and physiological changes in the pharyngeal airway and UES with aging . It has been found that the shape and size of the pharyngeal airway in elderly individuals differ from those of young adults. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Air-Q laryngeal mask airway (LMA) across different age groups (young, middle-aged, and elderly patients) and to evaluate complications associated with supraglottic airways (SGA).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
153

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 19, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 2, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 7, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 19, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Air-Q SP İntubating Laryngeal Airwayoropharyngeal leak pressuresupraglottic airways

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)

    One minute after successful LMA placement and fixation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) will be measured by setting the adjustable pressure limiting valve (APL) to 40 mmHg and maintaining a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The OLP will be recorded as the pressure at which an audible leak sound is heard from the mouth.

    One minute after successful LMA placement

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • SP Air-Q insertion time

    3 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • ease of LMA placement

    3 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • maneuvers required for successful ventilation

    3 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • fiberoptic view grading

    3 minutes after induction of anesthesia

  • Complications during SP_Air-Q removal (emerge)

    One minute after SP Air-Q removal

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group 1

Group 1 will include patients aged 18-40 years.

Other: Group 1 will include patients aged 18-40 years

Group 2

Group 2 will include patients aged 40-64 years.

Other: Group 2 will include patients aged 40-64 years

Group 3

Group 3 will include patients aged 65-85 years.

Other: Group 3 will include patients aged 65-85 years

Interventions

Group 1 will include patients aged 18-40 years.

Group 1

Group 2 will include patients aged 40-64 years, and finally.

Group 2

Group 3 will include patients aged 65-85 years.

Group 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with the use of an SP Air-Q.

You may qualify if:

  • year-old patients
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status classification I-III,
  • Undergoing an elective operation under general anesthesia in our hospital

You may not qualify if:

  • Predicted difficult airway (Mallampati class 4, mouth opening \< 3 cm, or thyromental distance \< 6 cm)
  • body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
  • Patients with a high risk of aspiration (e.g., history of gastrectomy, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or hiatal hernia),
  • Unstable vital signs,
  • Cervical spine problems, Respiratory complications (e.g. recent pneumonia).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zeynep Koç

Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lee JS, Kim DH, Choi SH, Ha SH, Kim S, Kim MS. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the i-gel and the Self-Pressurized air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Elderly Anesthetized Patients. Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):480-487. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003849.

  • Kim EM, Kim MS, Koo BN, Lee JR, Lee YS, Lee JH. Clinical efficacy of the classic laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients: a comparison with young adult patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec;68(6):568-74. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.568. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

  • Kim MH, Lee JH, Choi YS, Park S, Shin S. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):598-604. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000700.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative ComplicationsPharyngitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsPharyngeal DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2024

First Posted

August 21, 2024

Study Start

September 2, 2024

Primary Completion

November 7, 2024

Study Completion

March 30, 2025

Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations