NCT06551597

Brief Summary

A stroke can cause neurological deficits resulting in decreased motor, sensory, and cognitive function, as well as a decline in psychosocial functioning. Early rehabilitation following a stroke incident is of great importance, and interventions should aim for an overall improvement in patient functioning and achieving the highest possible level of independence. In recent years, there has been an emphasis on the need to regulate the inflammation that occurs after a stroke, as it may influence the improvement or deterioration of the patient's condition. Initial studies have also indicated the potential for influencing post-stroke inflammation through physical therapy procedures. In studies on the impact of magnetotherapy on inflammatory processes in post-stroke patients, magnetotherapy is usually applied to the pelvic girdle or the head area. However, the effectiveness of these two application methods has not yet been compared. In this study, investigators aim to compare the effects of magnetotherapy applied to different body areas as a complement to neurological rehabilitation. The study aims to assess the impact of magnetotherapy as a complement to neurological rehabilitation on physical fitness and inflammatory markers in post-stroke patients, to evaluate the effect of magnetotherapy as a supplement to neurological rehabilitation on physical fitness and oxidative stress markers in post-stroke patients, and to assess the differences between the effects of magnetotherapy applied to the pelvic area versus magnetotherapy applied to the head area. The participants will be divided into three groups: one will serve as the control group, while the other two will receive magnetotherapy to the head or the pelvis, respectively, as an addition to standard neurological therapy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 7, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

extremely low - frequency magnetic fields therapystrokerehabilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Functional Independence Measure

    The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a standardized tool used to assess a person's level of independence in performing daily activities, including self-care, mobility, and communication, with the results expressed in points.The total score for the FIM instrument will range between 18 and 126. he higher the score, the more independent the patient is.

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

  • Barthel Scale

    The Barthel Scale is a standardized tool used to measure a person's ability to perform basic activities of daily living independently, such as feeding, bathing, dressing, and mobility, with the results expressed in points. The score can range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the highest level of patient independence.

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

  • Tinetti Scale

    The Tinetti Scale is a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate a person's balance and gait, helping to determine their risk of falling, with the results expressed in points. The Tinetti Scale is scored from 0 to 28 points, with lower scores indicating a higher risk of falls.

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

  • Berg Balance Scale

    The Berg Balance Scale is a standardized tool used to assess a person's balance through various tasks, helping to evaluate their risk of falling, with the results expressed in points. Berg balance scale scores range from 0 to 56. The lower is the score, the higher is the risk of loosing balance and fall.

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

  • Short Physical Performance Battery

    The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a standardized tool used to assess lower extremity function through a series of tasks, including balance, walking speed, and chair stands, with the results expressed in points. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance).

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • C-reactive protein

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

  • Procalcitonin blood levels ng/ml

    The study will be conducted on the day of admission, after the series of treatments (approximately on the 14th day of stay), and at the day of discharge (approximately on the 35th day of stay)

Study Arms (3)

MT1 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the head in addition to standard therapy

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation

MT2 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the pelvis in addition to standard therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation

Control group - The group receiving only standard therapy

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

* In Group MT1, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - head, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation. * In Group MT2, patients will undergo 10 sessions (over 10 consecutive days excluding weekends) of low-frequency magnetotherapy (exposure site - pelvis, 40 Hz, 5 mT) as addition to standard neurological rehabilitation. * The control group participants will receive only neurological rehabilitation.

MT1 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the head in addition to standard therapyMT2 - The group receiving magnetotherapy to the pelvis in addition to standard therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Ischemic stroke within a maximum of two weeks prior to admission to the ward

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe functional impairment (FIM score \< 37)
  • History of previous strokes
  • Other neurological diseases or other conditions that could significantly impair the patient's functioning
  • Contraindications to magnetotherapy
  • Inability to establish logical verbal communication with the patient
  • Lack of informed consent to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Neurorehabilitation Ward, Greater Poland Provincial Hospital

Poznan, Poland

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Katarzyna Hojan, Assoc Prof

    Poznan University of Medical Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Tomasz Trzmiel, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2024

First Posted

August 13, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations