Technology Enriched Stroke Rehabilitation in Acute/Sub-acute Stroke
Feasibility of Inpatient Technology Enriched Stroke Rehabilitation During the Acute and Sub-acute Phase After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Delivery of intensive rehabilitation plays an important part within stroke care and has the potential to affect rates of recovery and optimise outcomes as part of a wider multidisciplinary approach. New and innovative models of rehabilitation delivery are needed in order to bridge the gap between current staffing resources and recommended levels of rehabilitation intensity. This study looks to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of such a model, using rehabilitation technology to enrich and enhance delivery of rehabilitation within an NHS inpatient stroke unit environment. This model of rehabilitation delivery has already been tested by the research team with community-dwelling participants in the chronic phase of stroke (over a year since stroke) and is known to be feasible and safe. Participants will be recruited from the stroke unit at University Hospital Wishaw during the acute and sub-acute phase of stroke (0-6 months since stroke), if requiring rehabilitation following a stroke and deemed medically fit enough to participate. Participants will be supported to complete activities in a newly dedicated 'technology enriched rehabilitation space' by NHS staff, in addition to their usual treatment. This will enable participants to engage in rehabilitation activities relating to their physical, cognitive, visual, communication and functional goals using equipment such as an adapted treadmill, interactive screens and tablets, upper limb exercise devices, power-assisted gym equipment and virtual reality. All devices are commercially available and known to be safe for use with stroke patients, however the use of such devices within NHS services is currently known to be under-utilised. Data will be obtained through a range of measures to monitor safety (incidence and types of adverse events), adherence (sessions/time attended, movement repetitions) and through interviews with participants, their family/carers, and staff to understand user acceptability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 8, 2023
July 1, 2023
1 year
July 7, 2023
July 31, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Duration of time spent on activities within the 'technology enriched rehabilitation space'
Time in minutes will be measured in which participants spent on activities within the 'technology enriched rehabilitation space'
1 year
Movement repetitions
Number of movement repetitions completed within 'technology enriched rehabilitation' sessions will be measured by use of wearable activity monitors (armbands)
1 year
Rates of recruitment and attrition
Percentage of eligible individual consenting to participate and percentage of people dropping/opting out before discharge.
1 year
Adherence to sessions
Number of sessions attended as a percentage of those available/targeted
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Intervention Acceptability
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Technology enhanced stroke rehabilitation
EXPERIMENTALSupported use of stroke rehabilitation technology
Interventions
In order to increase time spent in rehabilitation activity, participants will be prescribed and supported to use (by NHS staff) commercially available technology, such as robotics, adapted treadmills, virtual reality, and mobile digital devices such as smartphones, tablets, and wearable sensors.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of new stroke by NHS Lanarkshire physician
- More than 48 hours since stroke event
- Deemed medically fit for rehabilitation by medical staff
- Deemed to require rehabilitation
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Acutely medically unwell
- Active cardiac disease, such as unstable angina
- Active delirium/significant levels of confusion
- Seizure within past 7 days
- Individual currently being managed under the Adults with Incapacity Act
- Known pregnancy
- Unable to follow verbal, written or gestured basic instructions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Strathclydelead
- NHS Lanarkshirecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Wishaw
Wishaw, Lanarkshire, ML2 0DP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (10)
King D, Wittenberg R, Patel A, Quayyum Z, Berdunov V, Knapp M. The future incidence, prevalence and costs of stroke in the UK. Age Ageing. 2020 Feb 27;49(2):277-282. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz163.
PMID: 31957781BACKGROUNDLanghorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Aug;8(8):741-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
PMID: 19608100BACKGROUNDGittins M, Vail A, Bowen A, Lugo-Palacios D, Paley L, Bray B, Gannon B, Tyson S. Factors influencing the amount of therapy received during inpatient stroke care: an analysis of data from the UK Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jul;34(7):981-991. doi: 10.1177/0269215520927454. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
PMID: 32508132BACKGROUNDKwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013 Jan;8(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x.
PMID: 23280266BACKGROUNDWarland A, Paraskevopoulos I, Tsekleves E, Ryan J, Nowicky A, Griscti J, Levings H, Kilbride C. The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(18):2119-2134. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1459881. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
PMID: 29644897BACKGROUNDSchroder J, van Criekinge T, Embrechts E, Celis X, Van Schuppen J, Truijen S, Saeys W. Combining the benefits of tele-rehabilitation and virtual reality-based balance training: a systematic review on feasibility and effectiveness. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Jan;14(1):2-11. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1503738. Epub 2018 Oct 14.
PMID: 30318952BACKGROUNDKerr A, Smith M, Reid L, Baillie L. Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Aug 17;5(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/rehab.9219.
PMID: 30120086BACKGROUNDKerr A, Keogh M, Slachetka M, Grealy M, Rowe P. An Intensive Exercise Program Using a Technology-Enriched Rehabilitation Gym for the Recovery of Function in People With Chronic Stroke: Usability Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul 21;10:e46619. doi: 10.2196/46619.
PMID: 37477954BACKGROUNDNational Clinical Guideline for Stroke for the UK and Ireland, 2023 edition. Royal College of Physicians, London UK.
BACKGROUNDSkivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, Boyd KA, Craig N, French DP, McIntosh E, Petticrew M, Rycroft-Malone J, White M, Moore L. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
PMID: 34593508BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gillian Sweeney, PhD
South Health & Social Care Partnership
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2023
First Posted
August 8, 2023
Study Start
November 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share