Exparel Versus Bupivacaine in Post-operative Pain Control
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized study to evaluate anaesthetic parameters, postoperative analgesia and oral analgesic consumption comparing exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) vs. standard bupivacaine
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 28, 2026
CompletedJuly 28, 2026
June 1, 2026
10 months
August 7, 2024
June 3, 2026
June 30, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post Operative Pain Intensity (Visual Analog Scale VAS)
Post operative pain was assessed using 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worse imaginable pain. Patients recorded pain score twice daily (morning and evening) for four consecutive post operative days using a standardized at home questionnaire
Twice daily (morning and evening) from 0-96 hours post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post Operative NSAID/Acetaminophen Consumption
Daily from 0 to 96 hours post-operatively
Post Operative Opioid Consumption (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5/325) Use
daily from 0 to 96 hours post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
standard bupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient receive mandibular and maxillary infiltrations with 3mL of 0.5% standard bupivacaine.
liposomal bupivacaine
EXPERIMENTALpatient receive mandibular and maxillary infiltrations with 3mL of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel)
Interventions
At the end of the third molar extraction surgical procedure performed under general anesthesia and at least fifteen minutes following the most recent administration of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine nerve block (routine for this procedure), all patients will receive bilateral infiltrations with 3mL of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) OR with 3mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine while they are still under general anesthesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and nonpregnant female adults (≥18 years of age) with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 1, 2, or 3 who were scheduled to undergo bilateral third molar extraction (extraction of all 4 third molars) under local anesthesia and general anesthesia Study participants were required to have full or partial bony impaction of both mandibular third molars.
You may not qualify if:
- history of allergy or contraindication to amide-type local anesthetics, epinephrine, or opioids a history of any disease or condition or recent use of any drug that, in the opinion of the investigator, might increase the risk of surgery or interfere with study evaluations any use of long-acting opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, or acetaminophen within 3 days before screening or use of opioids within 24 hours of screening Patient that is pregnant or suspected to be pregnant Adults that cannot speak English, adults that are unable to consent on their own, or persons that are listed as vulnerable individuals will not be part of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Limitations and Caveats
This study have several limitations: * Operators were not blinded to group allocation which may introduce performance bias * Surgical difficulty and procedure duration were not standardized and may have varied between participants * Procedure has been performed by residents at different level of training which may have influenced outcomes * Baseline difference in ASA Physical status were present between the study groups
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mohammed Louay Taifour, DMD
- Organization
- Case Western Reserve University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Faisal Quereshy, MD
Case Western Reserve University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2024
First Posted
August 9, 2024
Study Start
August 21, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 28, 2026
Results First Posted
July 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share