Systemic Thrombolysis Versus Catheter Directed Management for Acute Intermediate-high Pulmonary Embolism
In Hospital Clinical Outcomes and Short Term Follow up of Systemic Thrombolysis Versus Catheter Directed Management for the Treatment of Acute Intermediate-high Pulmonary Embolism
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare in hospital clinical outcomes and one month follow up of systemic thrombolysis versus catheter directed management for the treatment of acute intermediate- high risk pulmonary embolism (using streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and catheter-based intervention group using Penumbra System).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2030
August 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
5.2 years
July 29, 2024
August 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change in blood pressure
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
Change in heart rate
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
Change in respiratory rate
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
Change of O2 saturation.
during hospital stay (about 1 week)
Change of RV signs of PE by Transthoracic echocardiography
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
Need for mechanical ventilation.
during hospital stay (about 1 week)
Need for surgical intervention.
surgical embolectomy
during hospital stay (about 1 week)
Duration of hospital stay.
during hospital stay (about 1 week)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
incidence of Perforation of pulmonary artery
during hospital stay (about 1 week)
incidence of pericardial effusion
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
incidence of Major bleeding
during hospital stay (about 1 week) and one month after discharge
Study Arms (2)
patients who received systemic thrombolysis
patients have been diagnosed with acute intermediate-high pulmonary embolism received I.V. streptokinase if there are no contraindications.
patients who underwent catheter-based intervention
patients have been diagnosed with acute intermediate-high pulmonary embolism underwent catheter-based intervention including thrombus aspiration or catheter directed thrombolysis using Penumbra System
Interventions
250000 IU as a loading dose over 30 min. Followed by 100000 IU/hour over 12:24hours or accelerated regimen 1.5 million IU over 2 hours
which comprised of several devices: * RED Reperfusion Catheters * Penumbra JET Reperfusion Catheters * ACE Reperfusion Catheters * MAX Reperfusion Catheters * 3D Revascularization Device * Penumbra ENGINE Aspiration Source * Penumbra ENGINE Canister * Aspiration Tubing
Eligibility Criteria
All patients will be subjected to: On admission: Detailed history for assessment of risk factors Clinical examination: Laboratory investigations. Trans-thoracic echocardiography to detect signs of PE: MSCT pulmonary angiography: for assessment of site, size and shape of pulmonary embolism. PESI and sPESI scores will be calculated for all patients. In hospital follow up: During hospital stay all patients will be followed up daily for assessment of hemodynamic, oxygen saturation, TTE, troponin level, need of mechanical ventilation or death. One month follow up after discharge: for the assessment of: Hemodynamic. Transthoracic echocardiography. MSCT pulmonary angiography.
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with acute intermediate-high pulmonary embolism
You may not qualify if:
- Patients less than 18 years of age.
- Low risk, intermediate low risk, acute pulmonary embolism
- patients with RV masses will be excluded.
- Patient refusal of treatment strategy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital University
Asyut, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayman K Mohamed, PHD
Assiut University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed O Abdelhameed, master
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Month
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2024
First Posted
August 9, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2030
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
compare in hospital clinical outcomes and one month follow up of systemic thrombolysis versus catheter directed management for the treatment of acute intermediate- high risk pulmonary embolism (using streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) and catheter-based intervention group using Penumbra System).