Health Protection and Promotion of Sign Language Interpreters Through Implementation of Total Worker Health®
2 other identifiers
interventional
133
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Using mixed-methods and a clinical efficacy trial design, the overall objective of this study will employ implementation strategies to adapt and evaluate a previous integrated Total Worker Health® (TWH®) program and pilot test its efficacy on sign language interpreter well-being. The central hypothesis is that interpreters in the health protection and promotion program (intervention) will demonstrate significantly improved well-being compared to those in a general health program (control).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2026
ExpectedFebruary 9, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.8 years
September 21, 2023
February 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-1 (TARS-1)
TARS-1 measures acceptability using six items (1=strongly disagree; 6=strongly agree) and demonstrates good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct and concurrent validity. The scale ranges from 6 to 36 with higher scores indicating better acceptability.
15 to 24 months
mean change in acceptability using the Training Acceptability Rating Scale-2 (TARS-2)
TARS-2 assesses perceived impact with eight items (0=not at all; 3=a great deal) and demonstrates good face and concurrent validity. Of particular interest, TARS-2 also includes three qualitative items asking about the most helpful part of the program and any recommended changes and invites other comments. The scale ranges from 0-24 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
15 to 24 months
mean change in Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale
This acceptability (six items), feasibility (three items), and appropriateness (five items) instrument will be used to assess whether or not the intervention efforts were successful. The 14 total items across three subscales demonstrate good to excellent internal consistency and are rated on a five-point scale (1=not at all; 5=extremely). High scores of 30, 15, and 25 and low scores of 6, 3, and 5 indicate excellent and poor acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, respectively.
15 to 24 months
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total summed scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- work evaluation and experience
Work evaluation and experience is the first of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 16 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 23-128 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace policies and culture
Workplace policies and culture is the second of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 14 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 12-75 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- workplace physical environment and safety climate
Workplace physical environment and safety climate is the third of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 10 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 14-60 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- health status
Health status is the fourth of five domains in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 23 total questions. There are five open text box items within this section (i.e. asking for the number of days the respondent gets high intensity physical activity). Otherwise, total scores of the Likert scale items within this section range from 24-146 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to post intervention (approximately 15-24 months)
mean change in the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's Worker Well-Being Questionnaire- home, community, and society
Home, community, and society is the final domain in this comprehensive measure of worker well-being and has 5 total questions. Total scores within this section range from 11-65 with higher scores indicating better outcomes (accounting for inverse scoring on negative items).
baseline to 6 months post intervention (approximately 21-30 months)
Study Arms (2)
Health Protection and Promotion Program
EXPERIMENTALGeneral Health Program
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
An adaptive integrated Total Worker Health® program. Virtual 8-week program that's been contextualized to the physical and mental health needs of sign language interpreters. It will examine biomechanics, sleep hygiene, vicarious trauma and burnout, demand-control schema, physical activity, emotional management strategies, proper nutrition and examination of worksite.
Virtual 8-week program that addresses participant sleep hygiene, physical activity and proper nutrition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilingual in English and American Sign Language
- Certified sign language interpreter working at least 10 hours/week in any interpreter setting.
- Apparently healthy
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 18 year old
- Not yet certified as a sign language interpreter
- Unable to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Related Publications (2)
Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Mikkelsen A, Gronningsaeter H, Sandal GM, Ursin H. Improving subjective health at the worksite: a randomized controlled trial of stress management training, physical exercise and an integrated health programme. Occup Med (Lond). 2002 Oct;52(7):383-91. doi: 10.1093/occmed/52.7.383.
PMID: 12422025BACKGROUNDTveito TH, Eriksen HR. Integrated health programme: a workplace randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04846.x. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
PMID: 19032505BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 21, 2023
First Posted
September 28, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Last Updated
February 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02