NCT06539936

Brief Summary

The investigators will test the following hypothesis: Use of Glide results in improved functional performance, satisfaction, and usage metrics as compared to use of a standard Direct Control (DC) prosthesis. This study will compare the use of Glide \[Experimental\] prosthesis with a DC \[Standard\] prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. We will follow a multiple baseline design, specifically an AB design. Each of the subjects will use the Experimental and Standard systems over a total of 24-weeks. The A phase is the baseline phase where the DC prosthesis will be used, and the B phase will be the treatment phase where the Glide prosthesis will be used. Participants will undergo an A phase of either 10-weeks, 12-weeks, or 14-weeks duration, with the remaining 14-, 12-, or 10-weeks of the study being dedicated to the B phase.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 16, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

amputationupper limbmyoelectric controlprosthesisglide

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comprehensive Arm Prosthesis and Rehabilitation Outcomes Questionnaire (CAPROQ)

    CAPROQ is a validated patient reported outcome measure that captures key facets of rehabilitation for adults with UL absence or loss: perceived function, satisfaction, and pain. CAPROQ includes a total of 28 questions spread across three sub-scales: 8 satisfaction, 10 perceived functioning, and 10 pain subcategory questions. Responses to all questions are given on a 10-point, Likert-type scale. Higher scores therefore indicate higher levels of overall satisfaction. A singular total CAPROQ score is derived by standardizing each of the CAPROQ subscales and summing these standardized scores together. Higher total scores on the CAPROQ indicate better rehabilitation outcomes and reflect the individual's perceived success with their prosthesis and rehabilitation; specifically, satisfaction with their prosthesis and rehabilitation, greater functional performance, and lesser pain. CAPROQ scores range from 0 to 100.

    Weekly (i.e., Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, ..., Day 161 and Day 168)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Capacity Assessment of Prosthesis Performance of the Upper Limb (CAPPFUL)

    Baseline (i.e., Day 0); Post-Intervention (i.e., Day 35/42/49, Day 70/84/98, Day 119/126/133, and Day 168)

  • Targeted Box and Blocks Tests (tBBT)

    Baseline (i.e., Day 0); Post-Intervention (i.e., Day 35/42/49, Day 70/84/98, Day 119/126/133, and Day 168)

  • Daily Mean Number of Movement Bouts (DMNMB)

    Daily (i.e., Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, ..., Day 167, Day 168)

  • Mean Prosthesis Wear Duration (MPWD)

    Daily (i.e., Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, ..., Day 167, Day 168)

  • FIT Survey

    Weekly (i.e., Day 0, Day 7, Day 14, ..., Day 161, and Day 168)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Multiple Baseline

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants act as their own controls. Participants are fit with a prosthesis system, which includes IBT's Core2 controller, IBT Electrodes, FlexCell batteries, and prosthetic componentry chosen by the patient and their clinical team. The provided controller can operate in two modes of operation: (1) in Direct Control (or DC); and (2) using the Glide control strategy. Participants progress through an AB multiple baseline protocol, where they use the provided prosthesis system for four evaluation periods (totaling 24-weeks in duration). During the A-phase, participants use the system with DC and during the B-phase, participants use the system with the Glide control strategy. For both interventions, the required hardware is the same, while the control software will differ.

Device: GlideDevice: Direct Control

Interventions

GlideDEVICE

Glide is a myoelectric prosthesis control strategy which enables multifunctional control using a limited set of input EMG signals (as few as two). The Glide control strategy uses the relative contributions of multiple electrode inputs to create a virtual cursor, calculated from a vector summation of multiple EMG channels, to select the type and speed of a movement from a circular map.

Multiple Baseline

Direct Control (DC) is the most common method of control for powered prostheses, which directly links the activity recorded from a single electromyography (EMG) electrode to a prosthesis action. Typically, a pair of EMG electrodes are placed over a pair of agonist/antagonist muscle groups to operate a single DOF (e.g., for transradial amputees the flexor muscles in the forearm may be mapped to the prosthetic hand closing and the forearm extensor muscles mapped to hand opening).

Multiple Baseline

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Trans-radial unilateral limb loss
  • Candidate for a multi-articulated myoelectric hand prosthesis as determined by the study prosthetist
  • Minimal residual limb length for myoelectric control as determined by the clinical team
  • Age of 18 years or greater

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a residual limb that is unhealed from the amputation surgery
  • Patients with easily damaged or sensitive skin who would not tolerate EMG electrodes
  • Unhealed wounds
  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Advanced Arm Dynamics

Redondo Beach, California, 90277, United States

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Rahul R Kaliki, Ph.D

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED)
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Executive Officer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Posted

August 6, 2024

Study Start

September 16, 2024

Primary Completion

March 31, 2026

Study Completion

March 31, 2026

Last Updated

March 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations