RESCU System for Robust Upper Limb Prosthesis Control
RESCU
User-driven Retrospectively Supervised Classification Updating (RESCU) System for Robust Upper Limb Prosthesis Control
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the use of RESCU \[Experimental\] Prosthesis with a \[Standard\] pattern recognition prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. The protocol will follow a single case experimental design (SCED) to compensate for the limited size of the patient population. Each of the participants will use the Standard and Experimental and systems over a 35-day period. The Standard system will include at least two controllable DoFs (hand, wrist, multi-articulated hand, etc) and a commercially-available pattern recognition controller. The RESCU system will use the same components as the Standard system but will differ with respect to incorporating eight IBT Element Electrodes (as required for pattern recognition control) and the RESCU control software. The hypothesis is that pattern recognition will outperform the commercially-available control strategy for most participants on in-clinic, at-home usage, and subjective measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 24, 2024
CompletedApril 24, 2024
April 1, 2024
1 month
July 31, 2019
January 8, 2024
April 23, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Daily Prosthesis Use Duration
Prosthesis usage time was monitored as a proxy for user satisfaction, under the assumption that when an individual is more satisfied with their prosthetic solution, they will use it more in their daily lives. For the experimental intervention, the mean daily prosthesis use duration is reported as the average number of hours the prosthesis was used daily over the evaluation period (i.e., four weeks). For the control intervention, the mean daily prosthesis use duration is reported as the average number of hours the prosthesis was used daily before the evaluation period (i.e., at baseline).
Baseline, 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA)
Baseline, Post-Fitting, Post-Intervention
Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey Upper Extremity Functional Status (OPUS UEFS)
Baseline, Post-Intervention
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Survey for Upper Limb Amputation (TAPES-ULA)
Baseline, Post-Intervention
PROMIS Satisfaction Short Form 8a
Baseline, Post-Intervention
Pain Scale
Baseline, Post-Fitting, Post-Intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Single-Case Experimental Design
EXPERIMENTALParticipants act as their own controls. They first use the Control device, which includes the pattern recognition controller, 8 electrodes, batteries, socket, frame, and prosthesis terminal device (hand/wrist/elbow). Participants are then transitioned to the Experimental device, which includes the RESCU controller, Apple iPad, 8 electrodes, batteries, socket, frame, and prosthesis terminal device (hand/wrist/elbow).
Interventions
Retrospectively Supervised Classification Updating (RESCU) is founded on two innovations that promise significant improvement in performance and outcome. The first is a highly robust machine intelligence algorithm, an Extreme Learning Machine with Adaptive Sparse Representation (EASRC), and the second is a novel adaptive learning algorithm and communication interface we call Nessa. We contend that these two technologies allow the prosthetic device to adapt to its user from the initial fitting through continuing, long-term use in the activities of daily living, shifting the paradigm of training from the current prospective data gathering methods to a more dynamic retrospective application.
Pattern recognition prostheses associate the patterns of activity of multiple EMG sites to the action of a prosthesis. Such strategies have historically required prospective calibration of the EMG activation patterns.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Trans-radial limb difference.
- Candidate for a 2+ degree-of-freedom (DoF) myoelectric pattern recognition prosthesis as determined by the study prosthetist
- Active pattern recognition myoelectric prosthesis user
- Fluent in English
- Age of 18 years or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a residual limb that is unhealed from the amputation surgery
- Patients with easily damaged or sensitive skin who would not tolerate EMG electrodes
- Unhealed wounds
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical Center O&P
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chief Executive Officer
- Organization
- Infinite Biomedical Technologies, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The occupational therapist who graded the AM-ULA functional assessment was masked to participant IDs and intervention
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Executive Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2019
First Posted
August 2, 2019
Study Start
November 7, 2023
Primary Completion
December 19, 2023
Study Completion
December 19, 2023
Last Updated
April 24, 2024
Results First Posted
April 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share