Enhanced Community First Responder System Evaluation in Singapore
TCPR-Link
Evaluation of an Enhanced Community First Responder Support System to Improve Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality for Patients Experiencing Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
1 other identifier
interventional
165
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The rise in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases in Singapore highlights the need for effective bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR). Despite many lay responders performing CPR, survival rates with good neurological outcomes have not significantly improved, prompting research into the quality of CPR as a critical factor. The study by Gallagher EJ et al. showed a significant survival improvement with high-quality CPR. To address this, the Unit of Pre-hospital and Emergency Research (UPEC) trained thousands of community first responders (CFRs) in simplified CPR techniques using hands-only and DA-CPR methods. A significant innovation is the CPRcard®, developed by Laerdal in Norway, which offers real-time feedback on the quality of chest compressions. However, only 36% of CFRs using the CPRcard® achieved the desired compression standards, indicating room for improvement. The study proposes enhancing CFR support with information communication technology (ICT), enabling two-way audio and one-way video communication between CFRs and dispatchers. This aims to reduce stress among responders, increase their willingness to engage with OHCA alerts, and improve CPR quality. The clinical trial in Singapore will compare the current system against the enhanced CFR support system (eCSS), focusing on the real-time relay of CPR performance data, communication ease, and implementation factors. The high-quality CFR and OHCA registries in Singapore provide a robust setting for this research, aiming to enhance CPR delivery and improve OHCA outcomes through technology and real-time support.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 years
July 24, 2024
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Good Chest Compression Depth (4-6cm)
OHCA events achieving great proportions of adequate compressions (achieving depth within the target range of 4-6 cm)
Throughout chest compression before handing over to EMS (up to 24 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Survivor discharging rate
Throughout Hospital Admission (up to 1 year)
Study Arms (2)
SoC
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard of Care
eCSS
EXPERIMENTALenhanced CFR support system (eCSS)
Interventions
Application that allows responder to perform CPR with two-way audio communication and one-way video streaming to SCDF Dispatcher
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old and above
- SCDF registered CFRs
- Trial dispatchers with an active account of myResponder® app on their mobile phones
You may not qualify if:
- The CFRs who are pregnant
- Experiencing any serious physical Conditions
- Mental Health Conditions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Singapore General Hospitallead
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical Schoolcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke-NUS Medical School
Singapore, Sigapore, 169857, Singapore
Related Publications (13)
White AE, Ho AF, Shahidah N, Asyikin N, Liew LX, Pek PP, Kua JP, Chia MY, Ng YY, Arulanandam S, Leong SB, Ong ME. An essential review of Singapore's response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: improvements over a ten-year period. Singapore Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):438-443. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2021114.
PMID: 35001113BACKGROUNDHo AFW, Lim MJR, Earnest A, Blewer A, Graves N, Yeo JW, Pek PP, Tiah L, Ong MEH; Singapore PAROS Investigators. Long term survival and disease burden from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Dec 28;32:100672. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100672. eCollection 2023 Mar.
PMID: 36785853BACKGROUNDChan PS, McNally B, Tang F, Kellermann A; CARES Surveillance Group. Recent trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Circulation. 2014 Nov 18;130(21):1876-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009711.
PMID: 25399396BACKGROUNDGallagher EJ, Lombardi G, Gennis P. Effectiveness of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 1995 Dec 27;274(24):1922-5.
PMID: 8568985BACKGROUNDBobrow BJ, Vadeboncoeur TF, Stolz U, Silver AE, Tobin JM, Crawford SA, Mason TK, Schirmer J, Smith GA, Spaite DW. The influence of scenario-based training and real-time audiovisual feedback on out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):47-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23465553BACKGROUNDSasson C, Rogers MA, Dahl J, Kellermann AL. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PMID: 20123673BACKGROUNDHollenberg J, Herlitz J, Lindqvist J, Riva G, Bohm K, Rosenqvist M, Svensson L. Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew--witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2008 Jul 22;118(4):389-96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.734137. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
PMID: 18606920BACKGROUNDSong J, Guo W, Lu X, Kang X, Song Y, Gong D. The effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 11;26(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0552-8.
PMID: 30309373BACKGROUNDBlewer AL, Ho AFW, Shahidah N, White AE, Pek PP, Ng YY, Mao DR, Tiah L, Chia MY, Leong BS, Cheah SO, Tham LP, Kua JPH, Arulanandam S, Ostbye T, Bosworth HB, Ong MEH. Impact of bystander-focused public health interventions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival: a cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e428-e436. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30140-7.
PMID: 32768435BACKGROUNDKim YJ, Ahn S, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Lee YS, Lee JH, Oh BJ, Lim KS, Kim WY. Long-term neurological outcomes in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 26826564BACKGROUNDWhite AE, Ng HX, Ng WY, Ng EK, Fook-Chong S, Kua PH, Ong ME. Measuring the effectiveness of a novel CPRcard feedback device during simulated chest compressions by non-healthcare workers. Singapore Med J. 2017 Jul;58(7):438-445. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017072.
PMID: 28741006BACKGROUNDOng ME, Quah JL, Ho AF, Yap S, Edwin N, Ng YY, Goh ES, Leong BS, Gan HN, Foo DC. National population based survey on the prevalence of first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills in Singapore. Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 May 18.
PMID: 23692983BACKGROUNDWhite AE, Yoon S, Fook-Chong S, Birkenes TS, Ng WM, Naing Win PT, Leong BSH, Jalil NA, Myklebust H, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ. Enhanced community first responder support system: protocol of a randomized trial to improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Resusc Plus. 2025 Nov 19;27:101167. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101167. eCollection 2026 Jan.
PMID: 41437946DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Not possible to mask participants and care provider. Outcome is assessed by a device. Analyst will be masked.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2024
First Posted
July 31, 2024
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04