Dispatcher-Assisted CPR: Low-Dose, High-Frequency Simulation-Based Training
Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Low-Dose, High-Frequency Simulation-Based Training and the Impact on Real Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Calls
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clear, concise, yes, and no answers can be challenging to achieve in the assessment of consciousness and breathing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) calls. Often callers will provide an unclear response, and this can lead to hesitation on the part of the Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). Further, the relatively small proportion OHCA calls represent might demand the need for simulation training in the dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) guiding itself. Therefore, the investigators investigate whether low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) simulation-based training of EMDs can increase the quality of DA-CPR in a simulation setting. Additionally, the investigators measure whether the effect of the training will be transferred to real OHCA calls. The study is a randomised controlled trial comparing LDHF simulation-based training to standard quality improvement of the EMD in a single centre. The study protocol is structured according to the SPIRIT 2013 statement, and the study will be reported in compliance with the CONSORT 2010 Statement. The investigators chose EMDs receiving standard quality improvement as the comparator group, to reflect a representative cohort of the EMDs not exposed to the LDHF simulation-based training program. The aims of this study are:
- 1.To measure the effect of LDHF simulation-based training on the quality of DA-CPR in a simulation setting.
- 2.To measure the effect of LDHF simulation-based training on the quality of DA-CPR in real OHCA calls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 25, 2019
CompletedJanuary 23, 2020
January 1, 2020
3 months
September 2, 2019
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time from a call is taken by EMD to first bystander compression
(seconds)
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (6)
EMD clarifies status of consciousness and breathing before asking any additional questions
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
Time from a call is taken by EMD to the recognition of cardiac arrest
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
EMD starts DA-CPR instructions
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
Time from a call is taken by EMD to EMD starts DA-CPR instructions
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
EMD is assertive when starting CPR instructions
During cardiac arrest calls, up to 1 hour
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group begins LDHF dispatcher training with one introduction week followed by twelve weeks of LDHF training. During the study period, all regular quality improvement (QI) activities, such as self-audits, case reviews, mentor groups, and status meetings will continue for all EMDs.
Comparison
NO INTERVENTIONDuring the study period, all regular quality improvement (QI) activities, such as self-audits, case reviews, mentor groups, and status meetings will continue for all EMDs.
Interventions
Twelve weeks of LDHF training The simulation-based training sessions take place at the EMDC, at extra workstations set-up as ordinary EMD workstations in an out-of-the-way area. Before each session, the EMD is informed about the simulation call and receives instructions concerning technical differences from a regular call. The instructor acts as a "standardised caller", guided by a computer program. This program, the Danish version of Resuscitation Quality Improvement for Telecommunicators (Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway), is a training program for DA-CPR based on the simulation platform Laerdal Learning Application. This modified version of the RQI-T program has, one test scenario, one data collection scenario and six different cardiac arrests scenarios as well as a feedback checklist based on the Danish dispatcher protocol Danish Index for Emergency Care. Each simulation session takes approximately 20 minutes, including introduction and feedback
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- EMD employed at the Copenhagen EMS at the time of enrolment.
You may not qualify if:
- Mean working time as call taker at Copenhagen EMS \< 8 hours/week.
- Planned employment cessation at the Copenhagen EMS during the data collection period.
- Planned leave from work longer than four weeks during the data collection period.
- Starting employment at the Copenhagen EMS during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services
Copenhagen, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Freddy Lippert, MD
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Oscar Rosenkrantz
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The research group and the participants will not be blinded to the allocation, except for the study statistician (A.K.E.), who will conduct all analyses blinded to the intervention group. Thus, the study statistician will not have access to the randomisation scheme or the random seed and will receive a dataset with the actual groups replaced with the numbers 0 and 1
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2019
First Posted
September 11, 2019
Study Start
September 12, 2019
Primary Completion
December 25, 2019
Study Completion
December 25, 2019
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Immediately following publication. Until 31st of December 2021
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who provide a sound proposal and gets approval from the Danish authorities.
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).