Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence Treatment in Primary Care: APP Co-Management and Electronic Consult
OUTPACE
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The burden of urinary incontinence (UI) on American women is immense in both human and financial terms, and continues to rise with the aging US population. Although numerous non-surgical management strategies have proven efficacy for both stress and urge urinary incontinence, there remains a lack of appropriate UI management in the primary care setting. The goal of this multi-site cluster randomized comparative effectiveness trial is to compare the effects of two methods of nonsurgical UI care delivery - electronic consult vs. advanced practice provider (APP) co-management. These two evidence-based, practice-changing strategies are designed to improve the quality of care for an ethnically diverse population of women with UI, and, by reducing deficits in care, obtain better patient-reported outcomes. Both arms of the study will include basic physician education (academic detailing) and electronic clinical decision support. In Arm 1, the investigators will implement an electronic referral system (electronic referral), in which specialists will electronically review referrals and make additional recommendations if appropriate primary UI care was not provided. In Arm 2, Advanced Practice Provider (APP) co-management will reduce the burden of care on the PCPs by providing UI care, patient education, and assisting with patient self-management through dedicated televisits (APP co-management).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 8, 2029
March 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
4.1 years
June 22, 2023
March 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Provider Quality of Care - Evidence-Based Quality Indicators
Provider adherence to 13 evidence-based quality indicators will be compared across the E-Consult and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Co-management arms.
Baseline
Provider Quality of Care - Evidence-Based Quality Indicators
Provider adherence to 13 evidence-based quality indicators will be compared across the E-Consult and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Co-management arms.
6 months
Change in provider quality of care measured by evidence-based quality indicators
Provider adherence to 13 evidence-based quality indicators will be compared across the E-Consult and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Co-management arms.
Baseline, 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Patient Symptoms - International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Baseline
Patient Symptoms - International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
3 months
Patient Symptoms - International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
6 months
Change in patients' urinary incontinence symptoms as measured by ICIQ-SF
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Patient Symptoms - Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
Baseline
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Electronic Consult (E-consult)
EXPERIMENTALIn Arm 1, the investigators will implement an electronic referral system (electronic co-management), in which specialists will electronically review referrals and make additional recommendations if appropriate primary UI care was not provided.
Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Co-management
EXPERIMENTALIn Arm 2, Advanced Practice Provider (APP) co-management will reduce the burden of care on the PCPs by providing UI care, patient education, and assisting with patient self-management through dedicated televisits (APP co-management).
Interventions
In implementing the electronic consultation system in the private sector, the investigators will model the Expected Practice developed by the Los Angeles County Specialty-Primary Care Work Group. This eConsult system utilizes a "kickback" mechanism by which a specialist, who reviews the referral, can return it if it has not met certain baseline criteria (e.g. for a woman with OAB/urinary urgency: document negative UA, scheduled voids, titrate fluids to thirst, Kegels, antimuscarinics, optimize diuretic control, adjust any diuretics).
To reduce additional burden of care on the PCPs, the investigators will incorporate Advanced Practices Providers into the patient education and self-management portion of care. The APPs will be trained together with the intervention physicians, but they will also undergo additional standardized training on patient education, UI knowledge, providing instruction on Kegel exercises, shared decision making, and self management. Patients will then be scheduled for a UI education and self-management session with the APP by telemedicine (video visit or telephone visit) within one month of their initial visit. For patients in need of an annual pelvic examination, and if the patient's PCP prefers to have the APP conduct the pelvic exam, a separate visit will be scheduled with the APP. A followup televisit will then be scheduled within three months of the initial APP visit, in order to assess the outcome of non-surgical treatment and determine if a specialist referral is indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Primary care physician belonging to a recruited office among one of three participating sites: UCSD, UCLA, KUMC
- Age \>18 y/o
- English or Spanish fluency
- Female
- Answers \"yes\" to incontinence screening tool and agrees to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Non-primary care specialty
- Does not belong to one of the participating offices
- Age \<18 y/o
- Answers \"no\" to incontinence screening tool and/or does not agree to participate
- Primary care provider (who reviews a list of patients that screen positive) deems patient ineligible due to pregnant, severe memory impairment, or psychiatric history preventing participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
- University of Kansascollaborator
- University of California, San Diegolead
- University of California, Los Angelescollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92093, United States
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas, 66045, United States
Related Publications (26)
Dieter AA, Wilkins MF, Wu JM. Epidemiological trends and future care needs for pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;27(5):380-4. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000200.
PMID: 26308198BACKGROUNDAnger JT, Scott VC, Kiyosaki K, Khan AA, Weinberg A, Connor SE, Roth CP, Wenger N, Shekelle P, Litwin MS. Development of quality indicators for women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Nov;32(8):1058-63. doi: 10.1002/nau.22353. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
PMID: 24105879BACKGROUNDAnger JT, Alas A, Litwin MS, Chu SD, Bresee C, Roth CP, Rashid R, Shekelle P, Wenger NS. The Quality of Care Provided to Women with Urinary Incontinence in 2 Clinical Settings. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 7.
PMID: 27164512BACKGROUNDAbrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 12559262BACKGROUNDAnger JT, Saigal CS, Litwin MS; Urologic Diseases of America Project. The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling adult women: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):601-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00242-9.
PMID: 16407004BACKGROUNDMarkland AD, Richter HE, Fwu CW, Eggers P, Kusek JW. Prevalence and trends of urinary incontinence in adults in the United States, 2001 to 2008. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.114.
PMID: 21684555BACKGROUNDWu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1278-1283. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96.
PMID: 19935030BACKGROUNDMesens T, Aich A, Bhal PS. Late erosions of mid-urethral tapes for stress urinary incontinence--need for long-term follow-up? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Sep;18(9):1113-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0301-4. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
PMID: 17347793BACKGROUNDSchnelle JF, Smith RL. Quality indicators for the management of urinary incontinence in vulnerable community-dwelling elders. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 2):752-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_2-200110161-00015. No abstract available.
PMID: 11601959BACKGROUNDGnanadesigan N, Saliba D, Roth CP, Solomon DH, Chang JT, Schnelle J, Smith R, Shekelle PG, Wenger NS. The quality of care provided to vulnerable older community-based patients with urinary incontinence. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 May-Jun;5(3):141-6. doi: 10.1097/01.JAM.0000123026.47700.1A.
PMID: 15115573BACKGROUNDBisgaier J, Rhodes KV. Auditing access to specialty care for children with public insurance. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 16;364(24):2324-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1013285.
PMID: 21675891BACKGROUNDRhodes KV, Bisgaier J, Lawson CC, Soglin D, Krug S, Van Haitsma M. "Patients who can't get an appointment go to the ER": access to specialty care for publicly insured children. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;61(4):394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.030. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
PMID: 23312670BACKGROUNDMehrotra A, Forrest CB, Lin CY. Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States. Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):39-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x.
PMID: 21418312BACKGROUNDDall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP, Storm MV. An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Nov;32(11):2013-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0714.
PMID: 24191094BACKGROUNDMcKibben MJ, Kirby EW, Langston J, Raynor MC, Nielsen ME, Smith AB, Wallen EM, Woods ME, Pruthi RS. Projecting the Urology Workforce Over the Next 20 Years. Urology. 2016 Dec;98:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.028. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
PMID: 27491965BACKGROUNDAlas AN, Dunivan GC, Wieslander CK, Sevilla C, Barrera B, Rashid R, Maliski S, Eilber K, Rogers RG, Anger JT. Health Care Disparities Among English-Speaking and Spanish-Speaking Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse at Public and Private Hospitals: What Are the Barriers? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov/Dec;22(6):460-466. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000315.
PMID: 27636216BACKGROUNDKhan AA, Sevilla C, Wieslander CK, Moran MB, Rashid R, Mittal B, Maliski SL, Rogers RG, Anger JT. Communication barriers among Spanish-speaking women with pelvic floor disorders: lost in translation? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):157-64. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318288ac1c.
PMID: 23611934BACKGROUNDMin LC, Reuben DB, Adams J, Shekelle PG, Ganz DA, Roth CP, Wenger NS. Does better quality of care for falls and urinary incontinence result in better participant-reported outcomes? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Aug;59(8):1435-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03517.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
PMID: 21806560BACKGROUNDBarnett ML, Yee HF Jr, Mehrotra A, Giboney P. Los Angeles Safety-Net Program eConsult System Was Rapidly Adopted And Decreased Wait Times To See Specialists. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):492-499. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1283.
PMID: 28264951BACKGROUNDSoni SM, Giboney P, Yee HF Jr. Development and Implementation of Expected Practices to Reduce Inappropriate Variations in Clinical Practice. JAMA. 2016 May 24-31;315(20):2163-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4255. No abstract available.
PMID: 27218624BACKGROUNDJennings LA, Tan Z, Wenger NS, Cook EA, Han W, McCreath HE, Serrano KS, Roth CP, Reuben DB. Quality of Care Provided by a Comprehensive Dementia Care Comanagement Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1724-30. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14251. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
PMID: 27355394BACKGROUNDBordeianou LG, Anger JT, Boutros M, Birnbaum E, Carmichael JC, Connell KA, De EJB, Mellgren A, Staller K, Vogler SA, Weinstein MM, Yafi FA, Hull TL; Members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Working Groups on Patient-Reported Outcomes. Measuring Pelvic Floor Disorder Symptoms Using Patient-Reported Instruments: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jan/Feb;26(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000817. No abstract available.
PMID: 31833996BACKGROUNDMcGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
PMID: 12826639BACKGROUNDYalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.
PMID: 12861145BACKGROUNDBarber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
PMID: 16021067BACKGROUNDMin LC, Reuben DB, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG, Solomon DH, Higashi T, Chang JT, Roth CP, Kamberg CJ, Adams J, Young RT, Wenger NS. Predictors of overall quality of care provided to vulnerable older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Oct;53(10):1705-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53520.x.
PMID: 16181169BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Urology, Vice Chair of Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2023
First Posted
September 15, 2023
Study Start
February 16, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 8, 2029
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Available by request.