Feasibility Analysis of LCD-SLA 3D Printing Technology for Overall Surgical Planning of Liver Malignant Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed liver models in hepatobiliary surgery planning compared to traditional digital simulations. It is conducted in three phases:
- 1.Development and validation of 35 3D-printed liver models, focusing on timeliness, cost, precision, and alignment with digital planning tools.
- 2.Optimization of the 3D reconstruction process using deep learning to enhance model accuracy and efficiency.
- 3.A retrospective comparative analysis of surgical outcomes in 64 patients, with one group using 3D-printed models and the other using digital simulations for surgical planning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2024
CompletedDecember 18, 2024
December 1, 2024
5 years
July 19, 2024
December 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Measure the volume of blood loss during surgery for each patient in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). This outcome assesses the efficacy of using 3D-printed liver models in reducing intraoperative blood loss compared to digital simulations.
During the surgery
Blood Transfusion
Assess the need for intraoperative blood transfusions for each patient in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). This outcome evaluates the impact of using 3D-printed liver models on the necessity for transfusions.
During the surgery
Operation Duration
Measure the total duration of the surgical procedure for each patient in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). This outcome assesses whether the use of 3D-printed models can reduce operation time.
During the surgery
Surgical Margin Status
Assess the status of surgical margins post-resection to determine the precision of tumor removal in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). R0 indicates no residual tumor, R1 indicates microscopic residual tumor.
Immediately after surgery
Postoperative Hospital Stay
Measure the length of hospital stay post-surgery for each patient in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). This outcome evaluates the impact of 3D-printed models on postoperative recovery time.
From surgery to discharge
Postoperative Complications
Measure the length of hospital stay post-surgery for each patient in both the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) and the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV). This outcome evaluates the impact of 3D-printed models on postoperative recovery time.
From the date of surgery until discharge, assessed up to 30 days.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Age
Before surgery
Sex
Before surgery
BMI (Body Mass Index)
Before surgery
AFP (Alpha-Fetoprotein)
Before surgery
Tumor Size
During the surgery
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
3D Printed Model Group (3DP)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive surgical planning based on physically developed and validated 3D-printed liver models from Phase One. The surgical procedures will be guided by these 3D-printed models.
3D Virtual Model Group (3DV)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive surgical planning based on digital simulations using the fastest AI-assisted segmentation method with manual adjustments from Phase Two. The surgical procedures will be guided by these digital simulations.
Interventions
Participants in the 3D Printed Model Group (3DP) will receive surgical planning based on physically developed and validated 3D-printed liver models from Phase One. These models will be used to guide the surgical procedures.
Participants in the 3D Virtual Model Group (3DV) will receive surgical planning based on digital simulations using the fastest AI-assisted segmentation method with manual adjustments from Phase Two. These digital simulations will be used to guide the surgical procedures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: Patients aged 18-75 years
- Gender: Both male and female patients
- Diagnosis: Confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA)
- Surgical Candidates: Patients who are candidates for hepatectomy
- Liver Function: Patients with adequate liver function (Child-Pugh A or B)
- Informed Consent: Patients who provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Non-Surgical Candidates: Patients not eligible for surgery due to advanced disease or comorbidities
- Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Severe Comorbidities: Patients with severe cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, or other systemic diseases
- Previous Liver Surgery: Patients with a history of previous liver resection or transplantation
- Uncontrolled Infections: Patients with uncontrolled active infections
- Inability to Comply: Patients unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yang Jihonglead
Study Sites (1)
Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
Baoding, Hebei, 071000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- he random allocation sequence was implemented using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes, each containing a card indicating group assignment. An independent administrative staff member, not involved in enrollment or treatment, prepared the envelopes. To conceal the allocation sequence, envelopes were stored in a secure, locked cabinet accessible only to the study coordinator, who was not involved in patient evaluations or surgeries. This maintained clinician blindness to allocations, preserving the integrity of the randomization process. Third-party medical staff, blinded to group allocation, evaluated the outcomes to ensure objective assessment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2024
First Posted
July 30, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will be available starting 6 months after the publication and will be accessible for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to \[lilinqian163@163.com\]. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
The plan includes sharing deidentified individual participant data (IPD) including study protocol, statistical analysis plan (SAP), informed consent form (ICF), clinical study report (CSR), and analytic code.