Ischemic Preconditioning at a Distance in Liver Surgery
HEPATOPROTECT
Randomized, Single-blind Study of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Hepatectomies
2 other identifiers
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During hepatic transection, it exists a high risk of perioperative blood loss. The haemorrhage and its consequences (hypovolemia and blood transfusion) might impact the short and long term morbidity The vascular control by hepatic pedicle clamping (Pringle's maneuver) or total hepatic vascular exclusion, helps minimizing blood loss and leads to a more extensive hepatic resection. Side effects of vascular control result of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) : these reperfusion lesions results of different mechanisms than those responsible for the ischemic one. IRI cause lesions and postoperative dysfunction of the remaining liver. Among strategies to reduce the adverse effects of IRI : ischaemic preconditioning (IPC) has been described. It can be either mechanical (intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping) or pharmacological (sevoflurane inhalation). Short intermittent vascular occlusions in a organ might produce a resistance to a longer ischaemic period. It is certainly a physiological organ adaptation to tissue hypoxemia, which has a therapeutic potential when targeted. During liver resection, ischaemic preconditioning is realised with periods of hepatic pedicle clamping and unclamping. It decrease morbidity and mortality and prevent postoperative hepatocellular insufficiency due to clamping and IRI at day 5. Ischaemic preconditioning may also be applied remotely. Indeed, it is shown that short ischaemic periods in a target organ can also have a protective effect on distant others. This mechanism involve three signalling pathways : neuronal , humoral and systemic pathways. In a previous randomized study, Kanoria and al, demonstrated that the remote ischaemic preconditioning group has shown significant lower rates of serum transaminases and higher liver clearance (spectrophotometry method) than the control group. A latest study, measuring postoperative prothrombin rates has shown improved liver recovery due to halogen agents such as sevoflurane.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 6, 2020
CompletedOctober 17, 2022
October 1, 2022
7 months
November 20, 2019
October 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Indocyanine green clearance
Indocyanine green clearance (%/min) by indocyanine green retention, measured with Limon pulse spectrophotometry method.
at 5 days after liver resection
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Serum transaminases rates
at day 1,day 3 and day 5 post-hepatectomy.
Prothrombin rate
at day 5 post-hepatectomy.
the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) score
at day 1,day 3 and day 5 post-hepatectomy.
the Clavien & Dindo score
at day 30 post-hepatectomy
duration of stay in the hospital.
at day 30 post-hepatectomy
Study Arms (2)
Inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet
EXPERIMENTALNo inflation
SHAM COMPARATORNo inflation of the pneumatic tourniquet placed on the lower limb
Interventions
a pneumatic tourniquet around 200 mmHg after venous chase of the lower limb, during 5 minutes then deflated. Repeated twice after general anaesthesia and prior to incision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Scheduled carcinogenic laparoscopy or laparotomy liver resection
- Insured under the social security system
- Inclined to comply to the study protocol and its duration.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient under guardianship
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Severe lower limb vascular disease
- Emergency surgery
- Contraindication of a treatment from the protocol
- Psychological disorder with difficulty to accede the protocol
- Absence of written informed consent
- Refusal to sign the protocol
- Non-registration to the social security system
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hop Claude Huriez Chu Lille
Lille, 59037, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gilles Lebuffe, MD,PhD
University Hospital, Lille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2019
First Posted
November 29, 2019
Study Start
June 16, 2019
Primary Completion
January 6, 2020
Study Completion
January 6, 2020
Last Updated
October 17, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10