Effects of rTMS on Cognitive Functions and Behavior in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Cognitive Functions and Behavior in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder ( ASD)
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder with core symptoms that include impairments in social communication and restricted and repetitive behaviors, interests, and activities. Social cognition is a broad term used to understand, perceive, and interpret information about others and ourselves in a social context. Impairments in social cognition are often highlighted as a potential mechanism underlying social disability in autism spectrum disorder. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive technique that modulates brain activity through targeted electromagnetic pulses. It's one of the methods used to deliver electrical stimuli through the scalp in conscious humans. Recently, rTMS has not only been used for the treatment of major depressive disorders, but it has also been advanced as a potential therapeutic technique to treat neurologic disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis, and many other neuropsychiatric disorders. High-order cognitive functions, such as Executive function (EF) and social cognition, rely on neural network oscillations in the gamma frequency (30-80 Hz) band. It has been proposed that GABA-inhibitory interneurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) contribute to the synchronization of pyramidal neurons, which is necessary for EF performance. Additionally, given the theory of abnormal synaptic plasticity and excitation/inhibition ratio in ASD, as well as the ability of TMS to modify cortical excitability and plasticity, it leads to exploring the therapeutic potential of rTMS in ASD. This study examines the effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS in improving social, cognitive, and sensory function in individuals with ASD. Further understanding of the effect of low-frequency rTMS in altering the cognitive function in ASD individuals with ASD may help to achieve some answers related to the mechanism behind ASD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 21, 2025
October 1, 2025
9 months
June 30, 2024
October 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Cognitive function
Measure the cognitive function by using Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) spatial working memory task, looking of any Statistical significance changes in this score of cognitive testing by using CANTAB battery in the active rTMS group before and after completion of rTMs sessions and in comparison, with the control group.
of intervention and 2 week, 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Severity level of Autism Spectrum disorders (ASD)
Any Statistical significance change in the severity level of Autism (ASD) , looking for any changes in the score of Childhood Autism Rating Scale,Second Edition (CARS2-ST) in the active rTMS group before and after completion of rTMs sessions and in comparison, with the control group. Score will be represented as Total row score and will be interpreted based on the following : for the age between 2-12 years old * (15-29.5) Minimal to no symptoms of autism spectrum disorder * (30 - 36.5) Mild to moderate symptoms of autism spectrum disorder * ( 37 and higher) Severe symptoms of autism spectrum disorder. CARS2-ST Score minimum= 15 and maximum= - , high CARS scores mean a worse outcome.
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Autism Spectrum disorder (ASD) Severity level
Any Statistical significance change in the severity level of Autism (ASD) , looking for any changes in the score of The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) teste in the active rTMS group before and after completion of rTMs sessions and in comparison, with the control group. Score will be represented as Total T-score and will be interpreted based on the following: * T-score of 59T or less ; the result in the normal range. * T-score of 60T through 75T; the result in the mild to moderate range. * T-score of 76T or higher; The result in the severe range. high SRS T-scores mean a worse outcome.
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Blood Biomarker ( Microtubule associated proteins (MAPs) ).
Any Statistical significance change in the plasma levels of Blood biomarkers in the active rTMS group before and after completion of rTMs sessions and in comparison, with the control group. Score will be represented as plasma concentration , Units of Measure: concentration unit pg/ml
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Blood Biomarker ( Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE);MYO 16 (myosin XVI); kirre like nephrin family adhesion molecule 3 (KIRREL3) ).
Any Statistical significance change in the plasma levels of Blood biomarkers in the active rTMS group before and after completion of rTMs sessions and in comparison, with the control group. Score will be represented as plasma concentration , Units of Measure: concentration unit ng/ml
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Psychology and behaviours
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Language,Speech and Communication skills
pre-intervention and 2 week then 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Sensory Processing using Sensory Processing Measure (SPM)
Before the beginning of intervention and 2 week, 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Sensory Processing
Before the beginning of intervention and 2 week, 3 Months after the last session in intervention for each participant
Study Arms (2)
active rTMS group
EXPERIMENTALMale and female ASD individuals aged between 5 and 11 years old who have been diagnosed with ASD. They should have a confirmed clinical diagnosis according to the DSM-5. This will be verified by a diagnostic report or direct communication with the diagnosing clinician. Also, with normal hearing based on past hearing screens. Exclusion criteria to ensure participant safety for the rTMS intervention and included: (1) a history of seizures or epileptiform activity; (2) the presence of any metallic implants within the cranium; (3) a history of significant head trauma or loss of consciousness; and (4) the presence of implanted electronic medical devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants). All participants in both study groups did not stop their medical or behavioral therapy for ASD. However, participants will be instructed to have a consistent medication regimen or behavioral treatment for at least one month before enrollment and throughout the trial.
wait-list-control group
NO INTERVENTIONMale and female ASD individuals aged between 5 and 11 years old who have been diagnosed with ASD. They should have a confirmed clinical diagnosis according to the DSM-5. This will be verified by a diagnostic report or direct communication with the diagnosing clinician. Also, with normal hearing based on past hearing screens. Exclusion criteria to ensure participant safety for the rTMS intervention and included: (1) a history of seizures or epileptiform activity; (2) the presence of any metallic implants within the cranium; (3) a history of significant head trauma or loss of consciousness; and (4) the presence of implanted electronic medical devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants). All participants in both study groups did not stop their medical or behavioral therapy for ASD. However, participants will be instructed to have a consistent medication regimen or behavioral treatment for at least one month before enrollment and throughout the trial.
Interventions
Stimulation with low-frequency rTMS at 1 Hz with 90% MT will be applied with a total of 180 pulses each time, which contains 18 trains with ten pulses and an interval of 20 s between any two adjacent trains. The TMS treatment course will be administered twice per week for 9 weeks; the first six treatments will be over the left DLPFC, the second six sessions will be over the right DLPFC, and the remaining six sessions will be placed on the bilateral DLPFC stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female ASD individuals
- age between 5 and 11 years old
- diagnosed with ASD on prior clinical assessment using the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-V criteria and corroborated by assessment using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS).
- Normal hearing ability based on past hearing screens.
- Participation will be limited to higher functioning (intelligence quotient \[IQ\] \>70) to maximize successful completion of tested paradigms, maintain alertness/attention, furthermore, the ability to follow instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals that are known to have epilepsy ( including Hx. of febrile convulsion) or have a family history of epilepsy.
- Any individual with a previous Hx. Of head injuries
- Any individual has been diagnosed with psychiatric illness, including ADHD, depression, psychosis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, or OCD.
- Individuals using a combination of Psychotropic Medications known for their significant seizure threshold lowering potential, for example, and not as a limitation: Bupropion, Citalopram, Duloxetine, Fluoxetine, Fluvoxamine, Mirtazapine, Paroxetine, Sertraline, Venlafaxine, Tricyclics, Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, and Risperidone.
- The presence of metallic objects, e.g., cranium clips or implanted biomedical devices.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physiology, Autism Research and Treatment Center (ARTC), King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC)/Collage of Medicine, King Saud University
Riyadh, Riyadh Region, 12372, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (19)
Lewis DA, Hashimoto T, Volk DW. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Apr;6(4):312-24. doi: 10.1038/nrn1648.
PMID: 15803162BACKGROUNDBaruth JM, Casanova MF, El-Baz A, Horrell T, Mathai G, Sears L, Sokhadze E. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Modulates Evoked-Gamma Frequency Oscillations in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). J Neurother. 2010 Jul 1;14(3):179-194. doi: 10.1080/10874208.2010.501500.
PMID: 21116441BACKGROUNDOberman LM, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Feb;45(2):524-36. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1960-2.
PMID: 24127165BACKGROUNDRegier DA, Kuhl EA, Kupfer DJ. The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;12(2):92-8. doi: 10.1002/wps.20050.
PMID: 23737408BACKGROUNDKaat AJ, Gadow KD, Lecavalier L. Psychiatric symptom impairment in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Aug;41(6):959-69. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9739-7.
PMID: 23605958BACKGROUNDFakhoury M. Autistic spectrum disorders: A review of clinical features, theories and diagnosis. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2015 Jun;43:70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
PMID: 25862937BACKGROUNDBattle DE. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Codas. 2013;25(2):191-2. doi: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000200017. No abstract available.
PMID: 24413388BACKGROUNDBlumberg SJ, Bramlett MD, Kogan MD, Schieve LA, Jones JR, Lu MC. Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011-2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2013 Mar 20;(65):1-11, 1 p following 11.
PMID: 24988818BACKGROUNDCharman T, Pickles A, Chandler S, Wing L, Bryson S, Simonoff E, Loucas T, Baird G. Commentary: Effects of diagnostic thresholds and research vs service and administrative diagnosis on autism prevalence. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;38(5):1234-8; author reply 1243-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp256. Epub 2009 Sep 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 19737794BACKGROUNDSamsam M, Ahangari R, Naser SA. Pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders: revisiting gastrointestinal involvement and immune imbalance. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 7;20(29):9942-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9942.
PMID: 25110424BACKGROUNDAmr M, Bu Ali W, Hablas H, Raddad D, El-Mehesh F, El-Gilany AH, Al-Shamy H. Sociodemographic factors in Arab children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Pan Afr Med J. 2012;13:65. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
PMID: 23346279BACKGROUNDDevelopmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2010 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Mar 28;63(2):1-21.
PMID: 24670961BACKGROUNDChristensen DL, Baio J, Van Naarden Braun K, Bilder D, Charles J, Constantino JN, Daniels J, Durkin MS, Fitzgerald RT, Kurzius-Spencer M, Lee LC, Pettygrove S, Robinson C, Schulz E, Wells C, Wingate MS, Zahorodny W, Yeargin-Allsopp M; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years--Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2012. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Apr 1;65(3):1-23. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6503a1.
PMID: 27031587BACKGROUNDSalhia HO, Al-Nasser LA, Taher LS, Al-Khathaami AM, El-Metwally AA. Systemic review of the epidemiology of autism in Arab Gulf countries. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2014 Oct;19(4):291-6.
PMID: 25274588BACKGROUNDInglese MD, Elder JH. Caring for children with autism spectrum disorder. Part I: prevalence, etiology, and core features. J Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Feb;24(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
PMID: 19159834BACKGROUNDFriedman S, Samuelian JC, Lancrenon S, Even C, Chiarelli P. Three-dimensional structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a large French primary care population suffering from major depression. Psychiatry Res. 2001 Nov 30;104(3):247-57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00309-2.
PMID: 11728614BACKGROUNDBeer JS, Ochsner KN. Social cognition: a multi level analysis. Brain Res. 2006 Mar 24;1079(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
PMID: 16513097BACKGROUNDKlomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallee A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Sep;58(4):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PMID: 26319963BACKGROUNDCasanova MF, Sokhadze EM, Casanova EL, Opris I, Abujadi C, Marcolin MA, Li X. Translational Neuroscience in Autism: From Neuropathology to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Therapies. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;43(2):229-248. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
PMID: 32439019BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
HAYFA A ALGHABBAN, MD,MSc
Department of physiology, collage of Medicine, King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the waiting list control design, blinding of participants and their guardians to group allocation was not possible. However, the clinicians performing the outcome assessments were blinded to the participants' group assignments to minimize potential observer bias.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2024
First Posted
July 29, 2024
Study Start
July 20, 2024
Primary Completion
April 30, 2025
Study Completion
September 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share