NCT06515028

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different anesthesia methods, general anesthesia and infraclavicular block, on oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in upper extremity forearm operations.This prospective study aims to determine the ideal anesthesia method for patients undergoing upper extremity forearm surgeries under tourniquet by comparing general anesthesia and infraclavicular block applications in terms of oxidative stress and ED related to ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
106

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 23, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 25, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

endothelial dysfunctionischemia reperfusionoxidative stressinfraclavicular blockgeneral anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Effects of Anesthesia Technique on Endothelial Function with using ultrasonographic technique

    In this study, investigators aimed to determine the ideal anesthesia method for patients undergoing upper extremity surgeries accompanied by a tourniquet, by comparing general anesthesia and infraclavicular block methods in terms of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction (ED) related to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Brachial artery FMD (flow-mediated dilation ) measurements will evaluated using ultrasonographic technique from the contralateral

    Brachial artery FMD measurements will evaluated using ultrasonographic technique from the contralateral Measurements will be taken at three different time points: preoperatively(FMD1), 24hours postoperatively (FMD2), 6th day postoperatively(FMD3)

  • Evaluation of the Effect of Anesthesia Technique on Endothelial Function with evaluated in the collected blood samples levels

    During the operation, the dorsal venous cannula in the foot was not utilized for any other purpose. The duration of surgery and tourniquet application was recorded for each group. Tourniquet pressure was set at approximately twice the systolic arterial pressure (SAP). Evaluated in the collected blood samples levels of Protein carbonyl (PC),xanthine oxidase (XO),nitric oxide (NO),malondialdehyde (MDA)

    before anesthesia (T0), 1 minute before (T1), 5 minutes after (T2), and 20 minutes after deflation of the tourniquet

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effects of Anesthesia Technique on Endothelial Function

    before anesthesia (T0), 1 minute before (T1), 5 minutes after (T2), and 20 minutes after deflation of the tourniquet

Study Arms (2)

Group GA: general anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group GA

Procedure: Group GA

Group IB : infraclavicular block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group IB

Procedure: Group IB

Interventions

Group GAPROCEDURE

Anesthesia induction will be performed preoxygenation with 3 minutes of 80% FiO2 , followed by intravenosus propofol 2-2.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 µg/kg. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be administered for neuromuscular blockade, followed by endotracheal intubation after 2 minutes of mask ventilation. Anesthesia maintenance will be achieved with inhalation of 2.5-3.3% sevoflurane with 50% oxygen and 50% air mixture, along with infusion of remifentanil at 0.1 micrograms/kg/min. ventilation will be performed using a volume-controlled.

Group GA: general anesthesia
Group IBPROCEDURE

infraclavicular brachial plexus block will be performed in supine position with the arm adducted and flexed at 90 degrees. A mixture consisting of 15 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 15 ml of 2% Lidocaine, and 30 ml of saline solution will be prepared, with equal concentrations distributed into three different syringes of 20 milliliters each. The clavicular notch will be palpated, and an ultrasound linear probe covered with a sterile sheath will be positioned in the lateral sagittal plane over this area to visualize the median, lateral, and posterior cords of the brachial plexus surrounding the axillary artery. A special Stimuplex A 22G, 100 mm needle will be used for plexus anesthesia. local anesthetic injection will be sequentially performed around the posterior, median, and lateral cords under ultrasound guidance. After confirming sensory and motor block, the operation will be commenced.

Group IB : infraclavicular block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Scheduled for upper extremity surgery using a pneumatic tourniquet
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 or over 65 years of age
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Malignancy
  • Cardiovascular disease history (congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, venous thrombosis)
  • Cerebrovascular disease history
  • Liver/kidney dysfunction
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • History of substance and tobacco use
  • History of extremity ischemia

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SBU Bagcilar Education and Training Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Rosenfeldt F, Wilson M, Lee G, Kure C, Ou R, Braun L, de Haan J. Oxidative stress in surgery in an ageing population: pathophysiology and therapy. Exp Gerontol. 2013 Jan;48(1):45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

    PMID: 22465624BACKGROUND
  • Gourdin MJ, Bree B, De Kock M. The impact of ischaemia-reperfusion on the blood vessel. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jul;26(7):537-47. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328324b7c2.

    PMID: 19412112BACKGROUND
  • Vlachopoulos C, Xaplanteris P, Aboyans V, Brodmann M, Cifkova R, Cosentino F, De Carlo M, Gallino A, Landmesser U, Laurent S, Lekakis J, Mikhailidis DP, Naka KK, Protogerou AD, Rizzoni D, Schmidt-Trucksass A, Van Bortel L, Weber T, Yamashina A, Zimlichman R, Boutouyrie P, Cockcroft J, O'Rourke M, Park JB, Schillaci G, Sillesen H, Townsend RR. The role of vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary prevention. A position paper from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripheral circulation: Endorsed by the Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology (ARTERY) Society. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Aug;241(2):507-32. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 16.

    PMID: 26117398BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • SEZEN KUMAS SOLAK

    Bagcılar Training Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2024

First Posted

July 23, 2024

Study Start

August 25, 2024

Primary Completion

December 30, 2024

Study Completion

January 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The investigators will not share individual patient data

Locations