Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-related Fatigue in Patients With Cancer Receiving Palliative Systemic Treatment
TIRELESS
Making Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-related Fatigue Fit for Implementation in Patients With Cancer Receiving Palliative Systemic Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cancer-related fatigue is highly prevalent in patients receiving treatment for gliomas or palliative systemic treatment for cancer and is experienced as one of the most burdensome symptoms affecting patients' daily functioning and quality of life. From the KWF-sponsored TIRED trial, we concluded that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective in reducing fatigue in cancer patients with severe fatigue during palliative systemic treatment and in glioma patients. However, in its current form, integration in routine medical care is difficult and scalability is a problem, as the intervention is time-intensive, requires face-to-face consults with a psychologists, and the availability of trained psychologists is limited. The investigators expect that inter-CBT will integrate well into clinical practice and prove non-inferior in achieving a reduction in fatigue compared to face-to-face CBT as investigated in the TIRED and GRIP study. It is further expected that the interviews will provide useful information to implement this intervention. The main aims to answer are:
- To determine the non-inferiority of CBT primarily led by nurese, compared with benchmark studies in which CBT was provided by psychologists, in its effect on reduction in cancer-related fatigue
- To adapt CBT delivery to the needs of patients treated with palliative intent and glioma (interdisciplinary web-based CBT for cancer-related fatigue.
- To investigate its feasibility by evaluating the practical workability, acceptability, and burden for patients and health care providers. Participants will follow the 12 weeks CBT intervention online, mainly guided by their nurse. Participants will start with a face-to-face session with the psychologists, partly together with their nurse, to start with setting their treatment goals. Then, they will work on the modules that are applicable to them. During the CBT intervention there will be a face-to-face session with their nurse to discuss the progress of their goals. Finally, all participants will complete the therapy by realizing their treatment goals. The outcomes with respect to fatigue severity and participants' goals will be discussed by the nurse with the participant in the final, face-to-face sessions. The face-to-face sessions will take 30 to max. 45 minutes, except for the first session, which will take one hour of which the nurse will be present during 15 minutes. Researchers will compare the outcomes of the study to a benchmark study where CBT was provided by psychologists in its effect on reduction in cancer-related fatigue.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable cancer
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2028
June 15, 2026
June 1, 2026
3 years
February 23, 2024
June 11, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Fatigue severity will be measured using the subscale fatigue severity (8 items, 7-point Likert scale) of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-fatigue).
The CIS-fatigue has shown to be sensitive to change, has good reliability and discriminative validity. Scores range from 8 to 56. A score of ≥35 indicates severe fatigue. Change = (week 14 score - baseline score).
Screening, baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Fatigue will be assessed with the symptom scale Fatigue ((3 items, 4-point Likert scale) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, version 3.0).
Baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
Quality of Life will be measured using the subscale global health status/QoL (2 items, 7-point Likert Scale) of the EORTC QLQ-C30.
Baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
Functional impairment will be measured using the subscales emotional functioning (4 items, 4-point Likert scale) and physical functioning (5 items, 4-point Likert scale, range 0 to 100) of the EORTC QLQ-C30.
Baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
Functional impairment will be assessed with the work and social adjustment scale (WSAS)
Baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
Healthcare consumption
Baseline (T0), week 14 after T0 (T1) and week 26 after T0 (T2)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Benchmark study
OTHERThe results will be compared to a benckmark consisting of a historical study population from the TIRED trial and the GRIP trial in which CBT was delivered by psychologists specialized in CBT.
Interventions
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a therapy that can help you manage your problems by changing the way you think and behave.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receive systemic treatment with palliative intent for a solid (non-brain) tumor
- Are ≥18 years old
- Are proficient in Dutch
- Report severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength, fatigue severity subscale \[CIS-fatigue\] score ≥35)
- A life expectancy of ≥6 months according to their oncologist
- Access to a device with internet
You may not qualify if:
- Symptomatic brain metastases
- Dual immunotherapy
- Have a poor performance status (Karnofsky \<70)
- Are currently receiving treatment for a mental disorder.
- Treatable somatic cause that could explain the presence of severe fatigue (other than the underlying disease and the cancer treatment itself)
- Severe cognitive deficits
- Glioma patients
- Histologically confirmed diffuse glioma WHO grade 2, 3, or 4
- Are ≥18 years old
- Are proficient in Dutch
- Report severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength, fatigue severity subscale \[CIS-fatigue\] score ≥35)
- A life expectancy of ≥3 months according to their oncologist
- Access to a device with internet
- Corticosteroid use
- Have a poor performance status (Karnofsky \<70)
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical Psychology
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105AZ, Netherlands
Related Publications (2)
Gorter M, Rottgering JG, Belgers V, Blom MEC, Thomassen B, De Witt Hamer PC, Niers JM, Kouwenhoven MCM, Bienfait HP, Gathier CS, Compter A, Geurts M, Snijders TJ, van de Ven PM, Douw L, Knoop H, Klein M. Bayesian adaptive randomized trial of blended cognitive behavioral therapy for severe fatigue in stable diffuse glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2026 Mar 1;28(3):693-703. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaf256.
PMID: 41208030RESULTPoort H, Verhagen CA, Peters ME, Goedendorp MM, Donders AR, Hopman MT, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Berends T, Bleijenberg G, Knoop H. Study protocol of the TIRED study: a randomised controlled trial comparing either graded exercise therapy for severe fatigue or cognitive behaviour therapy with usual care in patients with incurable cancer. BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 28;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3076-0.
PMID: 28129746RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2024
First Posted
July 22, 2024
Study Start
June 3, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2028
Last Updated
June 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share